Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1

    IDE hard drives?

    I'm curious about something. I've been looking around at different web hosts this past week, and noticed that a lot of them use IDE hard drives. This surprises me, because I expected most people that make a living off the reliability of their servers to be using SCSI drives. The reason being that IDE drives used to have the reputation of being throw-away drives that you use until they die a year or two later, as well as the fact that IDE drives aren't usually as fast at seeking as SCSI drives.

    Have IDE drives become that much more reliable, or is it not that big of an issue since the IDE drives offer more storage space at a cheaper price, that it's actually a viable solution? Can someone enlighten me?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Billerica, MA
    Posts
    25
    While most IDE drives probobly aren't quite as reliable as SCSI drives they are not as bad as they used to be, when was the last time you had a HD crash? I know I have drives that are 4+ years old that still work fine.

    As for speed SCSI is faster, but I don't think it would make a huge difference on most webservers, unless it was overloaded.

  3. #3
    I thought IDE and SCSI are somewhat the same, just have different transfer methods...
    Excell Hosting
    Budget Hosting

  4. #4
    They are both somewhat similiar in that they are both mass storage devices. But they way they manage that storage and interface to a client vary significantly

    http://www.pcmech.com/show/harddrive/79/

    Do a search in google for IDE vs SCSI and you'll get a whole mess of pages dissecting the diferences.

    Justin

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,572
    SCSI=Faster
    IDE=More data GB

  6. #6
    Also IDE drivers doing well in most situations

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Kelowna B.C.
    Posts
    1,686
    You don't need a SCSI drive when you have dual IDE's using RAID 0...better known as Stripping. This along with a motherboard capable of doing Serial ATA....who needs an expensive SCSI drive, especially when IDE's continually go down in price as space increases.
    Hosting.Express | Affordable Web and Email Hosting
    Shared | Reseller | 24/7 Support | NSA Free
    SPECIAL OFFER - domain name, email and cPanel web hosting = $3.73 per month | Contact Us: 1-800-861-1888

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    471
    We are slowly moving away from SCSI system for our network at work.
    Whereas a couple of years ago I always specified SCSI systems for our Windows/Linux/Exchane/SQL servers I now seriously look ar IDE.

    I still have RAID, RAID5 to be exact however I can get an IDE RAID5 configuration with 4x 160GB HD (480GB useable) for a lot less than a SCSI setup.

    IDE drives are proving to be just as reliable.
    I also have the same hot-swap abilities with the IDE array as I would with a SCSI.
    The only difference is that the IDE drives are 7200rpm and my SCSI systems are either 10,000rpm or 15,000rpm.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    159
    Originally posted by activeforce
    SCSI=Faster
    IDE=More data GB
    Also, IDE is cheaper
    Solid-Hosting.net - affordable multiple domain hosting solutions
    Reliability and Customer Service are our focus!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,761

    Re: IDE hard drives?

    Originally posted by soul
    I'm curious about something. I've been looking around at different web hosts this past week, and noticed that a lot of them use IDE hard drives. This surprises me, because I expected most people that make a living off the reliability of their servers to be using SCSI drives. The reason being that IDE drives used to have the reputation of being throw-away drives that you use until they die a year or two later, as well as the fact that IDE drives aren't usually as fast at seeking as SCSI drives.

    Have IDE drives become that much more reliable, or is it not that big of an issue since the IDE drives offer more storage space at a cheaper price, that it's actually a viable solution? Can someone enlighten me?

    Thanks.
    Years ago, IDEs were definitely not as reliable as SCSIs, but they've become pretty reliable over the years. I have a 6 year old Dell desktop here in the office, running around 12 or more hours per day, and the original 10GB HD is working fine . SATA drives are eventually going to replace SCSIs, as they're cheaper and can hold more data than SCSIs, but still have a speed advantage over IDEs.

    -Josh

  11. #11
    SCSI is MUCH better and cheaper.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    819
    Originally posted by Aeox
    SCSI is MUCH better and cheaper.
    Unless you're factoring in having to buy two IDE drives in the same lifetime as one SCSI you're wrong about the cheaper thing.

    Andrew
    NetHosted - UK based hosting solutions.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts
    4,980
    Reliability wise, nothing beats SCSI...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    London
    Posts
    672
    We now run a lot of servers, and a lot of workstation PCs, and we buy our drives from well known distributors; Maxtor, Seagate etc. I am yet to see an SCSI drive fail, whereas I have seen several IDE drives fail in the past.

    I would certainly not set up a single shared server nowadays with an IDE hard drive, not only do we get better performance, but I feel a heck of a lot more confident that years down the line I won't have to be replacing those SCSI drives. Perhaps I'm overly cautious, but I'd much rather be overly cautious now than run the risk of problems in the future.
    Jo Stonehouse - Kualowww.kualo.com
    Shared Web Hosting, Reseller Hosting, Cloud VPS & Dedicated Servers
    UK: 0800 138 3235 ❘ USA: 1-800-995-8256

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    379
    If you are going dedicated wouldn't it be relatively easy to just upgrade to an entire new server every year or so? This would also mean replacing the hard drives, usually. I would think you'd need to with the speed technology is growing.

  16. #16
    Go with SCSI if you have the money..

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    633
    Actually, go with a Western Digital Raptor drive if you have the money. Those things are FAST :|
    Former owner of A Small Orange
    New owner of <COMING SOON>

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    263
    Originally posted by timdorr
    Actually, go with a Western Digital Raptor drive if you have the money. Those things are FAST :|
    Um, the comparison was between drive types, not drive manufacturers.
    #include<cstdio>
    char*s="#include<cstdio>%cchar*s=%c%s%c;%cint main(){std::printf(s,10,34,s,34,10);}";
    int main(){std::printf(s,10,34,s,34,10);}

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    633
    Raptor's are 10K RPM IDE drives. SCSI speed with an SATA (Read: IDE-like) interface. I'm not comparing another drive manufacturer, simply stating that the interface doesn't solely determine speed.
    Former owner of A Small Orange
    New owner of <COMING SOON>

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    204
    you also need to look at the type of application you're going to be using this for. I mean, if you're going to be doing a lot of HD thrashing, definately scsi in terms on speed and long term reliability.

    for a basic webserver... not doing any heavy dynamic stuff, ide will do just fine. but of course, you then have to factor in, is the system your leasing from the DC set up properly (assuming you're not going colo). an overheating drive of any type will always be bad

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •