Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: Ping WHT, what do you get?
-
11-21-2001, 04:19 PM #1Disabled
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 489
Ping WHT, what do you get?
run ping -n 10 webhostingtalk.com
what do you get ?
here's my result
Pinging webhostingtalk.com [209.249.55.203] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=242
Ping statistics for 209.249.55.203:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 52ms, Average = 48ms
-
11-21-2001, 04:48 PM #2Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 71
Pinging webhostingtalk.com [209.249.55.203] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=246
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=246
Ping statistics for 209.249.55.203:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 22ms
-
11-21-2001, 05:26 PM #3Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 4,931
Pinging 209.249.55.203 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=290ms TTL=245
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=245
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=245
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=245
Ping statistics for 209.249.55.203:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 271ms, Maximum = 290ms, Average = 280ms
From a lowly UK based 56k connection.
-
11-21-2001, 05:39 PM #4Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Posts
- 2,312
At home on Road Runner Cable:
Code:Pinging webhostingtalk.com [209.249.55.203] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 209.249.55.203: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 40ms, Average = 32ms
Last edited by Rewdog; 11-21-2001 at 06:32 PM.
Get your certificate of knowification autographed by REW!
Visit rewdog.com for details.
-
11-21-2001, 06:11 PM #5Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Location
- NYC
- Posts
- 6,623
$ ping -i 450 webhostingtalk.com
PING webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=6165731.1 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3211900.8 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=5124922.8 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=6388671.9 ms
--- 209.249.55.203 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 55% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 3211900.8/5222806.6/6388671.9 ms
Pinged from my backyard using CPIP.Specializing in SEO and PPC management.
-
11-21-2001, 06:52 PM #6Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 716
Pinging webhostingtalk.com [209.249.55.203] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 209.249.55.203:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 28ms, Average = 24ms
-
11-21-2001, 07:11 PM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Posts
- 2,312
holy cow, 14 ms!
Get your certificate of knowification autographed by REW!
Visit rewdog.com for details.
-
11-21-2001, 07:34 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Location
- Lancaster, PA
- Posts
- 687
From a VDI server..
root@server558 [~]# ping -c 10 webhostingtalk.com
PING webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203) from 66.78.52.2 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=0 ttl=247 ti
me=2.241 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 ti
me=2.559 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=2.408 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=3 ttl=247 time=2.829 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=4 ttl=247 time=2.272 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=5 ttl=247 time=2.308 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=6 ttl=247 time=2.734 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=7 ttl=247 time=2.232 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=8 ttl=247 time=2.295 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=9 ttl=247 time=2.646 msec
--- webhostingtalk.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 2.232/2.452/2.829/0.215 msholy cow, 14 ms!Matt Kaufman
mkaufman@techboost.com
-
11-21-2001, 08:10 PM #9Disabled
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 37
how do u run?
-
11-21-2001, 08:26 PM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Location
- Lancaster, PA
- Posts
- 687
Originally posted by mewbad
how do u run?
To run ping..
From Linux:
ping -c 10 webhostingtalk.com (for 10 pings)
From Windows:
Start > Run > cmd (or command) and type ping webhostingtalk.comMatt Kaufman
mkaufman@techboost.com
-
11-21-2001, 08:33 PM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Posts
- 2,312
2 ms lol, i forgot people would do it from their servers.
Get your certificate of knowification autographed by REW!
Visit rewdog.com for details.
-
11-21-2001, 09:27 PM #12Disabled
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 37
Oh
ok i know how to run now
I use my legs
lol
THX mkaufman
-
11-21-2001, 10:16 PM #13Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Posts
- 77
From my laptop:
Pinging webhostingtalk.com [209.249.55.203] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=796ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=838ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=961ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=961ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 209.249.55.203:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 796ms, Maximum = 961ms, Average = 889ms
From my server:
PING webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=0 ttl=247 time=27.5 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=26.6 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=26.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=3 ttl=247 time=26.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=4 ttl=247 time=26.6 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=5 ttl=247 time=26.6 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=6 ttl=247 time=26.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.249.55.203: icmp_seq=7 ttl=247 time=26.6 ms
--- webhostingtalk.com ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 26.6/26.7/27.5 ms
-
11-21-2001, 10:36 PM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Posts
- 2,312
My server at NAC
Code:PING webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203) from 207.99.79.130 : 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=0 ttl=249 time=3.730 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=9.974 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=2 ttl=249 time=7.132 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=3 ttl=249 time=7.228 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=4 ttl=249 time=7.800 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=5 ttl=249 time=8.512 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=6 ttl=249 time=6.877 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=7 ttl=249 time=6.959 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=8 ttl=249 time=7.566 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=9 ttl=249 time=10.186 msec --- webhostingtalk.com ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 3.730/7.596/10.186/1.718 ms
Get your certificate of knowification autographed by REW!
Visit rewdog.com for details.
-
11-21-2001, 11:47 PM #15Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 71
From my server
Code:PING webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203) from 66.162.64.126 : 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=0 ttl=246 time=6.206 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=1 ttl=246 time=6.260 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=2 ttl=246 time=6.219 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=3 ttl=246 time=6.250 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=4 ttl=246 time=5.925 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=5 ttl=246 time=6.267 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=6 ttl=246 time=6.418 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=7 ttl=246 time=6.110 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=8 ttl=246 time=6.022 msec 64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=9 ttl=246 time=6.004 msec
-
11-22-2001, 12:35 PM #16Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 1,631
I have no luck from my RR cable
----------------------------------
Pinging webhostingtalk.com [209.249.55.203] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=764ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=817ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=824ms TTL=243
Reply from 209.249.55.203: bytes=32 time=796ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 209.249.55.203:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 764ms, Maximum = 824ms, Average = 800ms
------------------------------------
From my servers is allot better
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=6 ttl=240 time=47.442 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=7 ttl=240 time=50.320 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=8 ttl=240 time=48.365 msec
64 bytes from panther.webhostingtalk.com (209.249.55.203): icmp_seq=9 ttl=240 time=47.875 msec
-
11-22-2001, 01:04 PM #17Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Posts
- 77
Carlos, my Road Runner Cable was also giving me a much slower ping compared to my servers. (see above post.)
-
11-22-2001, 01:15 PM #18Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 1,631
Yeah, I see it .. so I guess WHT is as slow for you as it is for me
I know Matt is working on a solution