Results 1 to 25 of 30
Thread: New Nocster Bandwidth?
-
04-19-2004, 10:28 AM #1Taking a break from hosting
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Posts
- 2,761
New Nocster Bandwidth?
Looks like Nocster has added PCCWBTN bandwidth to their current mix.
root@server2 [~]# traceroute pccwbtn.net
traceroute to pccwbtn.net (63.218.3.250), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 ge-6-0-core.scr1.hostnoc.net (66.96.192.1) 0.265 ms 0.328 ms 0.357 ms
2 66.197.191.46 (66.197.191.46) 4.603 ms 4.620 ms 4.606 ms
3 ge3-0.2.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net (63.218.31.5) 4.737 ms 5.079 ms 4.982 ms
-Josh
-
04-19-2004, 12:10 PM #2Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Chile
- Posts
- 43
Good!
TraceRoute - Monday, April 19, 2004 12:09:41
Generated by CyberKit Version 2.5
Copyright © 1996-2000 by Luc Neijens
Address: sixto.red7.net
Number of Packets: 1
Packet size: 64
Trace Hop 1 through 64
Timeout: 5
Resolve Addresses: Yes
Don't Fragment: No
#1 stgo-ip1.adsl.ifxnw.cl (200.73.29.1): TTL Exceeded, ttl=64, 31 ms
#2 clsclnoc7206x1.ifxcore.net (216.241.0.6): TTL Exceeded, ttl=254, 32 ms
#3 Unavailable (200.62.6.66): TTL Exceeded, ttl=253, 125 ms
#4 ser5-0.2.ar01.mia01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.11.21): TTL Exceeded, ttl=252, 156 ms
#5 pos2-0.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net (63.218.30.33): TTL Exceeded, ttl=247, 172 ms
#6 hostnoc.ge3-0.2.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net (63.218.31.6): TTL Exceeded, ttl=247, 172 ms
#7 ge-7-0-ctsi.rtr0.scra1.hostnoc.net (66.197.191.45): TTL Exceeded, ttl=247, 156 ms
Statistics: Out 7, in 7, loss 0%, times (min/avg/max) 31/130/172 ms
-
04-19-2004, 01:06 PM #3Taking a break from hosting
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Posts
- 2,761
Wow, that's a pretty direct route. What were you pinging Nocster at before the change?
-Josh
-
04-19-2004, 01:44 PM #4Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 5,383
Thats a very nice bandwidth provider. I used to get 26 hops from my isp now its only 17
Clustered Hosting With Continuous Data Protection (CDP)
http://www.solidinternet.com
8 Years of hosting excellence!
-
04-19-2004, 03:16 PM #5Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 8,535
Re: New Nocster Bandwidth?
Originally posted by Joshua
Looks like Nocster has added PCCWBTN bandwidth to their current mix.So now they have XO, Cogent, Verio, and PCCWBTN. Good sign for Asian users.
-Josh
-
04-19-2004, 04:04 PM #6Taking a break from hosting
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Posts
- 2,761
They were having some issues with the fact that they were picking up Global Crossing in NYC, having it go to PHL, and then to Scranton. They didn't have redundancy (dual routers or fiber) on the NYC-PHL route, and there were some issues, so they scrapped it for the time being. Not sure if they're eventually bringing it back in through Philly or not.
-Josh
-
04-19-2004, 04:34 PM #7WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 148
Sweet, MainArea looking more attractive to get my first dedicated from
-
04-19-2004, 06:23 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Satyr, Chrisalya, Canada
- Posts
- 1,901
9 Hops from west coast here
--
-
04-19-2004, 06:25 PM #9Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Satyr, Chrisalya, Canada
- Posts
- 1,901
1 26 ms 107 ms 23 ms 24.82.184.1
2 26 ms 29 ms 29 ms rd1bb-ge3-0.vc.shawcable.net [64.59.154.130]
3 53 ms 29 ms 29 ms rc1bb-pos15-0.vc.shawcable.net [66.163.69.70]
4 32 ms 29 ms 29 ms rc1wt-pos2-2.wa.shawcable.net [66.163.76.54]
5 30 ms 30 ms 28 ms ge3-0.cr02.sea01.pccwbtn.net [198.32.180.13]
6 105 ms 106 ms 108 ms pos2-0.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net [63.218.30.33]
7 105 ms 107 ms 105 ms hostnoc.ge3-0.2.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net [63.218.31.6]
8 108 ms 107 ms 107 ms ge-7-0-ctsi.rtr0.scra1.hostnoc.net [66.197.191.45]
9 112 ms 113 ms 113 ms 6696192220.hostnoc.net [66.96.192.220]
Great Indeed--
-
04-19-2004, 06:51 PM #10Build It Better!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 5,448
Still running through Cogent here (just south of Philly);
4 11 ms 12 ms 11 ms pos-7-2-cr01.torresdale.pa.core.comcast.net [68.
87.19.209]
5 13 ms 12 ms 11 ms 12.118.114.9
6 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms tbr2-p012301.phlpa.ip.att.net [12.123.137.66]
7 19 ms 20 ms 19 ms tbr1-cl9.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.2.85]
8 19 ms 20 ms 18 ms ggr1-p360.abnva.ip.att.net [12.123.217.1]
9 18 ms 20 ms 23 ms p11-1.pr01.iad01.atlas.psi.net [154.54.11.113]
10 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms p1-1.core01.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.1.1
85]
11 23 ms 24 ms 24 ms p4-0.core01.phl01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.18
]
12 24 ms 23 ms 24 ms g7.ba21.b003003-1.phl01.atlas.cogentco.com [38.1
12.34.138]
13 23 ms 23 ms 24 ms BurstNet.demarc.cogentco.com [38.112.11.122]
14 28 ms 27 ms 28 ms ge-7-0-ctsi.rtr0.scra1.hostnoc.net [66.197.191.4
5]
15 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms 6696192225.hostnoc.net [66.96.192.225]
-
04-19-2004, 06:53 PM #11WebHostingTalk Lover
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 7,406
Hmm, they havnt made any official announcements on this yet, I'd wait on their say first
█• Taskade - To-Do List & Tasks • All-in-One To-Do List & Mind Map App for Remote Teams
█• Simple and shareable to-do lists for web, mobile, and desktop
█• To-Do List Templates • 300+ shareable templates and productivity workflows
█• Get things done, faster and smarter! • I eat penguins for breakfast ...
-
04-19-2004, 06:55 PM #12Been around for too long...
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- DC
- Posts
- 3,643
Watcher - Comcast is still big with their ATT connection, and ATT has been offloading a lot of traffic to PSI/Cogent lately (at least with Comcast traffic). You do have to remember that Comcast's only connection is ATT (they used to tie in with the Comcast Business network, but not anymore from what I can see).
I've been seeing ATT -> Cogent a LOT in my traces from home for many providers, not just Burst.
- Matt
-
04-19-2004, 07:00 PM #13Taking a break from hosting
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Posts
- 2,761
Originally posted by Hoobastank68
Hmm, they havnt made any official announcements on this yet, I'd wait on their say first
-Josh
-
04-19-2004, 07:03 PM #14Build It Better!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 5,448
When I am tracing to any of the following;
Nac
Fluidhosting
ServInt
Gnax
Rusko.us
I don't see any Cogent at all, just when tracing to Burst...
-
04-19-2004, 07:49 PM #15Been around for too long...
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- DC
- Posts
- 3,643
Watcher - I don't think any of those have Cogent, or at least not a large amount of Cogent. NAC has a Cogent link, but they also have a direct link to ATT, so it doesn't matter. EV1 goes over Cogent or Williams for me (keeps changing). Either way, Cogent isn't a bad thing in this case - just check the speeds. I'm nearly maxing out my 3Mbps connection downloading a speed test (getting 2.8Mbps).
I get an average ping of 50ms to ServInt (ATT -> Cent - >GNAPS), but only 30ms to ZubrCom in Equinix Ashburn (ATT -> GBLX -> nLayer) from home. Routes, speeds, and pings will be different on every connection across the country. The good thing about BTN is that it has direct peering with many cable companies, including Rogers and Shaw, as well as AOL, ALGX, Telia, KPN, Tiscali, Broadwing, BellSouth, MSN, NAC, and many others. They also have peering in Equinix Ashburn & San Jose (I think that's SJO). Either way, PCCWBTN is here to stay & is looking great from Burst.
- Matt
-
04-19-2004, 08:13 PM #16Build It Better!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 5,448
I wasn't commenting on the quality of Cogent, just that I don't see it in any routes except to Burst. EV1 runs through Williams for me so I don't see it there either.
-
04-19-2004, 08:38 PM #17Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Posts
- 4,980
I am a fan of BtN bandwidth, very little hops and great bandwidth!
Sounds like a great news to nocster clients.
-
04-19-2004, 09:44 PM #18Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 257
Wow I am near London, Ontario (Canada =D ) and I use to ping 40 to burst now I ping like almost 100
====================================
Tracing route to burst.net [66.96.192.201]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 10 ms 9 ms 44 ms gw03.lndn.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.90.6
5]
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 10 ms 14 ms 12 ms gw01.strfrd.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.81
.82]
6 11 ms 12 ms 11 ms gw01.ktchnr.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.81
.78]
7 12 ms 21 ms 12 ms gw01.ktchnr.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.81
.106]
8 13 ms 11 ms 12 ms gw01.glph.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.81.8
6]
9 12 ms 24 ms 15 ms gw01.hnsn.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.81.9
0]
10 18 ms 13 ms 17 ms gw02.mtnk.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.81.6
1]
11 14 ms 15 ms 15 ms gw02.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80
.157]
12 14 ms 16 ms 34 ms gw02.bloor.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80.
5]
13 36 ms 20 ms 48 ms gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80.133
]
14 61 ms 62 ms 60 ms igw01.chcrmk.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.8
1.190]
15 65 ms 61 ms 58 ms ge3-1.br01.chc01.pccwbtn.net [63.218.5.5]
16 91 ms 91 ms 106 ms pos2-0.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net [63.218.30.33]
17 92 ms 100 ms 94 ms hostnoc.ge3-0.2.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net [63.218.3
1.6]
18 94 ms 96 ms 94 ms ge-7-0-ctsi.rtr0.scra1.hostnoc.net [66.197.191.4
5]
19 96 ms 97 ms 95 ms burst.net [66.96.192.201]
Trace complete.eXeGaming : Professional Gaming Organization
-
04-19-2004, 09:47 PM #19Been around for too long...
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- DC
- Posts
- 3,643
Jaali - I had customer also using Rogers who complained about that too. It seems that Rogers gives priority to their BTN routes, which takes a toll on latency. Submit a ticket to Burst so that they can check things out with BTN, who could possibly fix the issue between them & Rogers.
- Matt
-
04-20-2004, 02:09 AM #20Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- Darmstadt, Germany
- Posts
- 1,096
congrats, looks nice! BTN rocks
In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday.
-
04-20-2004, 02:58 AM #21Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 293
what's hops and why PCCWBTN bandwidth is good for asian area? thanks.
-
04-20-2004, 03:29 AM #22Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 703
Great news.
-
04-20-2004, 04:26 AM #23Disabled
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 287
Interesting information. Hope this will appreciate all clients
-
04-20-2004, 09:58 AM #24Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Posts
- 4,980
Nocster
6 219.93.173.35 (219.93.173.35) 75.946 ms 2.791 ms 3.601 ms
7 219.93.171.26 (219.93.171.26) 205.334 ms 209.833 ms 204.774 ms
8 ge4-1.cr02.sjo01.pccwbtn.net (206.223.116.48) 209.903 ms 206.098 ms 205.693 ms
9 pos5-1.cr01.chc01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.6.38) 272.595 ms 267.716 ms 268.638 ms
10 pos5-0.cr02.nyc02.pccwbtn.net (63.216.4.37) 440.155 ms 441.048 ms 436.952 ms
11 pos2-0.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net (63.218.30.33) 435.397 ms 463.759 ms 458.432 ms
12 hostnoc.ge3-0.2.cr01.phl02.pccwbtn.net (63.218.31.6) 429.412 ms 436.468 ms 479.692 ms
13 ge-7-0-ctsi.rtr0.scra1.hostnoc.net (66.197.191.45) 459.756 ms 442.650 ms 449.099 ms
14 6696192220.hostnoc.net (66.96.192.220) 470.226 ms 473.376 ms 461.992 msGlobal Compass - Cyberwurx
5 202.188.126.132 (202.188.126.132) 4.085 ms 2.908 ms 3.226 ms
6 219.93.173.35 (219.93.173.35) 2.870 ms 2.960 ms 3.126 ms
7 219.93.171.26 (219.93.171.26) 204.752 ms 205.015 ms 204.503 ms
8 ge4-1.cr02.sjo01.pccwbtn.net (206.223.116.48) 205.633 ms 205.754 ms 206.620 ms
9 pos5-1.cr02.atl01.pccwbtn.net (63.218.22.38) 266.988 ms 266.506 ms 266.930 ms
10 globalcompass.ge3-0.3.cr02.atl01.pccwbtn.net (63.216.31.134) 268.902 ms 267.083 ms 269.997 ms
11 ge-3-2-atl1-ag1.globalcompass.com (66.154.95.195) 266.828 ms 268.609 ms 267.139 ms
-
04-20-2004, 10:27 AM #25Newbie
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK
- Posts
- 15
Originally posted by fuse1982
what's hops and why PCCWBTN bandwidth is good for asian area? thanks.