View Poll Results: Leave a message or get placed on hold?
- Voters
- 50. You may not vote on this poll
-
I prefer to be placed on hold and wait.
36 72.00% -
I prefer to leave a message.
10 20.00% -
Other, I'll explain...
4 8.00%
Results 1 to 25 of 31
-
03-25-2004, 02:00 PM #1Build It Better!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 5,448
Leave a message or be placed on hold?
We use our phones a lot, probably almost as much as our email. Right now if the lines are busy, rather than being placed on hold a caller is forwarded to where they can leave a message.
I'm wondering how people see this, our initial feedback is that they prefer to be able to leave a quick message rather than get held up on hold or in some queue where it takes them 10 minutes to leave a message.
What's your preference and why do you feel that way?
-
03-25-2004, 03:05 PM #2Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Nashville - It's not just Country
- Posts
- 215
That's an easy one.
Put on hold. At least it starts off with a personal greeting, and makes me feel more special.
-
03-25-2004, 03:09 PM #3Dennis Johnson
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Location
- Kalamazoo
- Posts
- 33,412
I'd rather have the option. Be put on hold and while on hold have the option of leaving a message.
There is no best host. There is only the host that's best for you.
-
03-25-2004, 03:21 PM #4Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- Duluth MN
- Posts
- 3,863
I don't like leaving messages on peoples voicemail, unless it is someone I know very well, even then, I don't like leaving messages.
I'll call, get an answering machine or voicemail message, and hang up right away. In high school, my girlfriend's mom became quite annoyed with me as I would call, no one would be home, and I wouldn't leave a message. So they would get home and there would be 7 calls on their caller id, with no messages
Funny thing is, I really don't like talking on the phone that much, and yet I work for the helpdesk on campus....
-
03-25-2004, 03:55 PM #5Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Posts
- 889
Hold... gets rid of the "I didn't get your message" excuse. Also, it prevents them from taking 2 days to return your call, leaving you in the dark in the meantime not knowing whether they are ignoring you or just really busy.
-
03-25-2004, 04:09 PM #6Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Twin Cities Area
- Posts
- 5,649
hire more people to answer the phone
if you haven't considered chapter 7 bankruptcy, maybe you should.
eliminate your debt, keep the property you want, most people qualify.
contrary to popular belief - no attorney is necessary!
-
03-25-2004, 04:14 PM #7Build It Better!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 5,448
Originally posted by LaurenStephens
hire more people to answer the phone
Would the amount of time you're on hold make a difference? For example would you get more ticked off if you were on hold for longer than 5 minutes as opposed to leaving a message from the outset?
I guess that's probably why Dennis chose the option of being able to leave a message when he wanted to from a menu option in the hold queue...
-
03-25-2004, 04:20 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Twin Cities Area
- Posts
- 5,649
thats probably why a lot of people prefer to deal with smaller companies
if you haven't considered chapter 7 bankruptcy, maybe you should.
eliminate your debt, keep the property you want, most people qualify.
contrary to popular belief - no attorney is necessary!
-
03-28-2004, 01:09 AM #9Mr. Awesome
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 6,347
Do both.
If they call and you are "busy", then put them on hold. The hold message should immediately ask them if they want to leave a message.. or they can continue to hold.
However, you MUST be careful to ALWAYS return the messages. I have used several companies that never return my message even though they say they will.... and there's nothing worse.
-
03-28-2004, 01:20 AM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 1,135
"If you would like to continue to hold, please stay on the line. Otherwise, press XX to leave a message in the general mailbox, or dial your parties ext. to leave a message for them."
---
Dan Ushman
Co-founder & CMO
SingleHop, Inc.
-
03-28-2004, 03:23 AM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Australia (Crikey)
- Posts
- 2,271
give the option for both....if not, just keep them on hold. Leaving a message sucks as you never know whether it will be returned...
-
03-28-2004, 03:23 AM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 2,240
I say hold is a better option. This way clients will think twice before constantly calling over the smallest issues that can easily be resolved over email.
I too hate leaving messages because you have to constantly talk and it's hard as heck to end a call with a machine - "Thanks, bye" just seems wierd to me.Download my eBook + Videos: Starting your own successful web hosting company.
Learn from a web host with 7 years of experience.
-
03-28-2004, 04:06 AM #13ex-Aussie
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Location
- Tacoma, Washington
- Posts
- 9,576
On hold. I almost never leave a message on a machine.
Former Webhost... now, just a guy.
-
03-28-2004, 10:52 AM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Posts
- 5,221
Greetings:
I believe our customers would prefer the option of holding or going to voice mail is a person is not readily available.
Thank you.
-
03-28-2004, 11:52 AM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
- Posts
- 1,585
I would rather be on hold as long as I ain't on hold for more than 20 minutes, then I would just leave a message.
Golden Globe Hosting | It's Time To Get Online.
www.goldenglobehosting.com
info@goldenglobehosting.com
-
03-28-2004, 01:21 PM #16Build It Better!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 5,448
While we use a specific message for calls that come when the lines are tied up, it seems the general consensus is that being place on hold with an option to leave a message is preferable.
My own preference is to leave a message, I hate wasting time being put on hold or in some queue. If I don't get a prompt return call I won't be doing business with <insert company name here> very long anyway. Looks like my preference is in the minority though.
From this poll it looks like we should re-evaluate the phones....
Thanks for the input....
-
03-29-2004, 07:17 PM #17Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 454
I think it all goes to who your target demo is. I can think of two customers in particular who only have a cell phone and no land line at home. They hate to be put on hold because it just eats up their minutes.
But then again, what good is it to leave a message if no one returns it?
Rick
-
03-29-2004, 08:13 PM #18Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Proud She-Geek
- Posts
- 1,723
Personally, I have too many other things to be dealing with to sit on hold. I'd rather leave a message; if I don't hear back from someone within a reasonable period of time, then I'll call back.
<?php echo "Signature here"; ?>
-
03-29-2004, 08:21 PM #19Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Posts
- 11,052
I don't know how sophisticated your phone system is, but ideally I'd say have a recording come on saying that all operators are currently busy, and the estimated wait time is *enters time here*. Then give them the option to hold or to hit # or some key to leave a message. At least this way, they have an idea on how long they would have to wait if they decided to stay on hold.
And for the record, I'd much rather stay on hold. I'm calling by phone because I want/expect info quickly. Otherwise I would have emailed to begin with.
VitoDemoDemo.com - Flash tutorials since 2002
DemoWolf.com - 5,300+ Flash tutorials for hosting companies, incl. Voice tutorials
-
03-29-2004, 08:27 PM #20Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Dec 2000
- Posts
- 610
Are there any companies (Kall8?) that have phone queues or would you need a real inhouse system?
-
03-29-2004, 08:41 PM #21Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,598
I would rather stay on the line and wait. I hate having to leave messages with companies not knowing when they are going to call me back.
When I dial up a company, I expect to talk with someone immediately, if not wait a while to eventually be served. It would be such a nuisance to have to leave a message or to continually call the number again.
If your phone system really is busy, and serves as an essential component to operating your business, then I would suggest upgrading the system to offer whoever's calling the option to do both (stay on line or leave a message).
-
03-29-2004, 10:00 PM #22Build It Better!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 5,448
Originally Posted by Vito
Basically it's just two lines and if one is busy you go to the next one, if the second one is busy then you get a message but the message is a different message than one if you were to call and no one was to answer the phone.
Phone systems are pretty expensive and right now the number of times we actually need more than two lines going are not so common that I want to think about dropping a few thousand to get a system set up that can do the <insert # of minutes left on queue here>.
It's not bad for existing clients who know who you are and have had all positive experiences with you. They know that a return call would be coming in minutes not even hours. It's the sales and people that hang up without leaving a message that could be a concern.
@mpalamar
Kall8 has some terrific Routing features and we use them but as far as I can tell there are no queue systems they offer....
-
03-29-2004, 10:23 PM #23Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Posts
- 1,446
Queue systems are often quite expensive. http://www.bizfon.com is a lower cost phone management system, but it does not have a queue feature either.
To answer the question, I prefer to be on hold and have the option to leave a message if I need to.
- John C.
-
03-29-2004, 10:49 PM #24Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Location
- Denver, CO
- Posts
- 3,302
I am not a waiter. Being on hold longer than 2 minutes annoys the hell out of me, but I'm not particuarly fond of using the phone as a communications method unless absolutely neccessary.
I would prefer VM w/ a call back.Jay Sudowski // Handy Networks LLC // Co-Founder & CTO
AS30475 - Level(3), HE, Telia, XO and Cogent. Noction optimized network.
Offering Dedicated Server and Colocation Hosting from our SSAE 16 SOC 2, Type 2 Certified Data Center.
Current specials here. Check them out.
-
03-29-2004, 11:04 PM #25Build It Better!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 5,448
Originally posted by JohnCrowley
Queue systems are often quite expensive. http://www.bizfon.com is a lower cost phone management system, but it does not have a queue feature either.
To answer the question, I prefer to be on hold and have the option to leave a message if I need to.
- John C.