02-25-2004, 01:38 PM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 987
|
|
Please ping 207.219.125.29 and let me know if this is good for gaming hosting...
Thanks for your suggestions since we are planning to go with this local provider.
|
02-25-2004, 01:47 PM
|
|
Poooooonnyyy :*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,895
|
|
Here ya' go Bevis! 
Pinging 207.219.125.29 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=50
From Victoria, BC, Canada (west coast).
80 isn't that bad, but it comes down to who're you aiming for (location wise).
~Francisco
__________________
BuyVM - OpenVZ & KVM Based VPS Servers - Chat with us
- All popular VPN methods supported
- Affordable offloaded MySQL & DDoS protection
- 5GB backup space, unmetered private LAN bandwidth & native IPv6 included. All with a strong serving of pony
|
02-25-2004, 01:48 PM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 987
|
|
Could you also try 64.229.193.102
Thanks
|
02-25-2004, 01:50 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 549
|
|
From Gilbert, AZ.
Pinging 207.219.125.29 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=47
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=47
Ping statistics for 207.219.125.29:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 125ms, Maximum = 129ms, Average = 126ms
Pinging 64.229.193.102 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=110
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=110
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=110
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=110
Ping statistics for 64.229.193.102:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 78ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 79ms
|
02-25-2004, 01:50 PM
|
|
Poooooonnyyy :*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,895
|
|
Yup!
Pinging 64.229.193.102 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=117
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=117
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=117
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=117
Ping statistics for 64.229.193.102:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 88ms, Maximum = 111ms, Average = 94ms
~Francisco
__________________
BuyVM - OpenVZ & KVM Based VPS Servers - Chat with us
- All popular VPN methods supported
- Affordable offloaded MySQL & DDoS protection
- 5GB backup space, unmetered private LAN bandwidth & native IPv6 included. All with a strong serving of pony
|
02-25-2004, 01:51 PM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 987
|
|
Ping 207.219.125.29
[s207-219-125-29.on.hsia.telus.net]
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 15 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 32 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 15 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 31 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 16 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 31 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 16 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 31 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 16 ms
Round trip time to 207.219.125.29: 15 ms
Average time over 10 pings: 21.8 ms
Which one would you go for...the first one or the second one?
|
02-25-2004, 01:53 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,273
|
|
second one. 
__________________
IWDN - Really smart web developers... and me!
More than any time in history mankind faces a crossroads.
One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction.
Let us pray that we have the wisdom to choose correctly. 
|
02-25-2004, 01:54 PM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 987
|
|
So the 64 one right 
|
02-25-2004, 01:58 PM
|
|
Poooooonnyyy :*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,895
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BVS
Which one would you go for...the first one or the second one?
|
Again, who's your main target? which area?
For me, on the west coast, the first is better. But, for other people it might be the 2nd
~Francisco
__________________
BuyVM - OpenVZ & KVM Based VPS Servers - Chat with us
- All popular VPN methods supported
- Affordable offloaded MySQL & DDoS protection
- 5GB backup space, unmetered private LAN bandwidth & native IPv6 included. All with a strong serving of pony
|
02-25-2004, 01:59 PM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 987
|
|
Oh right I didnt read that. Well this server is located in Toronto so I thought of aiming for Toronto since I get like pings in the 20s here.
|
02-25-2004, 02:00 PM
|
|
Poooooonnyyy :*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,895
|
|
If you're targetting the Eastern martket, then ya, for sure the 2nd one 
~Francisco
__________________
BuyVM - OpenVZ & KVM Based VPS Servers - Chat with us
- All popular VPN methods supported
- Affordable offloaded MySQL & DDoS protection
- 5GB backup space, unmetered private LAN bandwidth & native IPv6 included. All with a strong serving of pony
|
02-25-2004, 02:02 PM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 987
|
|
Alrighty then...thank you for your suggestions and help. Will see how this goes
|
02-25-2004, 02:14 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 698
|
|
I get an average of 102 with the first and 98 with the 2nd. I am on the WestCoast.
|
02-25-2004, 02:30 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 526
|
|
Pinging 207.219.125.29 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=292ms TTL=49
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=287ms TTL=49
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=288ms TTL=49
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=49
Ping statistics for 207.219.125.29:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 287ms, Maximum = 340ms, Average = 301ms
dont worry i am far far away and i am downloading video files so your ping is ok 
|
02-25-2004, 02:36 PM
|
|
Retired Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,475
|
|
Pinging 207.219.125.29 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=49
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=49
Reply from 207.219.125.29: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=49
Ping statistics for 207.219.125.29:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 46ms
---
Pinging 64.229.193.102 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=108
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=108
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=108
Reply from 64.229.193.102: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=108
Ping statistics for 64.229.193.102:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 45ms
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|
