hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Web Design and Content : Image Quality
Reply

Web Design and Content Subjects include, HTML, graphics, editors, CSS, Flash, graphics creation, placing of ads, ad serv companies, copyright, content and nearly anything else design related. Also talk about businesses that provide design services. If you link to your site, you must post in Web Site Reviews.
Forum Jump

Image Quality

Reply Post New Thread In Web Design and Content Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2004, 06:32 PM
Xshare Xshare is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,419

Image Quality


I would by no means call myself a photoshop pro, but as most people do, I know my way around the software. My question deals with image quality. Usually whenever I save as a JPEG, even at 100 quality, the quality doesn't seem very good. I don't know but other people's graphics usually seem just much better quality... wondering if anyone has any ideas why this might be happening?

__________________
Ask about custom logo design! :: TalkSka.com - Your source for Ska News and Forums. Join today!
AIM=IQPhat
MSN=xshare101@hotmail.com
EMAIL=Use the board's email system, please.

Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 01-05-2004, 07:18 PM
marengo marengo is offline
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 112
I always play around settings. Some image looks good on 60% .
jpg, some - 80% (I have never used 100%) , some images are good in .gif. Also when you create your new document in Photoshop (ctrl + N) be sure resolution of your image is good. I use always ( even for web ) 300 dpi. Normally for web 72 dpi is ok, but I use 300 like for print. Which version do you use, btw?



Nat

__________________
bestcatalog.net - PR4 directory
http://webdesignbe.com/ - Web Design Service: read our latest newsletter

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2004, 07:31 PM
MG315 MG315 is offline
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Aesthetic Studios
Posts: 167
^there's no point of using 300 dpi for web, you're just making the image larger. (pc) screens cant render higher than 72dpi ^

about the quality of jpegs, jpeg is a lossy file format - that means when you save it you actually lose some quality. the amount of quality lost depends on the image but it is always there. quality is lost so as to compress the image. an example of a lossless file format is tiff. you save a tiff and you wont lose any of the original quality. this is what many scanners default to because they don't want to lose quality before you even look at it.

of course this is only with raster images, once you get into vector there's no quality loss at ANY size or resolution.

__________________
Bill Erickson : Resume | Aesthetic Studios

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 01-05-2004, 07:58 PM
marengo marengo is offline
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 112
^there's no point of using 300 dpi for web, you're just making the image larger. (pc) screens cant render higher than 72dpi ^

are you sure? right now I have tried with aqua button 72 dpi and 300 dpi - 80% .jpg - result is 600 kb for both pics.
But as for monitors I didn't know. I use 300 cause it's par default in my settings. Thanks for info.
Nat

__________________
bestcatalog.net - PR4 directory
http://webdesignbe.com/ - Web Design Service: read our latest newsletter

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2004, 10:44 PM
MG315 MG315 is offline
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Aesthetic Studios
Posts: 167
(pc) monitors can only render up to 72 dpi. 300+ is used for printing. however, i've heard that macs can see up to 91 dpi but i'm not sure if that's true.

do this. open up photoshop or fireworks (i'm using fireworks right now since i dont feel like opening photoshop) and make a new image 100px x 100px @ 300dpi. then go to "Image size..." and uncheck "resample image". now change the dpi to 72. you should see the size of the image change from .333in to 1.389in. that's what i meant. it is still the same amount of pixels (there's 10,000 pixels in each image) its just how far they are spaced apart is different. if you print both images, the sizes and quality (although it might not be too noticable) will be different. but when viewing on screen, you don't see the 300dpi, only a 72 dpi rendition of it.

__________________
Bill Erickson : Resume | Aesthetic Studios

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
Learn How to Build Storage Architecture to Guarantee QoS in SolidFire Webinar Blog 2013-03-26 12:45:56
eTail West 2013 Web Hosting Events 2013-02-01 10:35:53
Web Host Go Daddy Reveals New London Olympics Ads Created by Ad Agency Deutsch Web Hosting News 2012-07-26 14:16:28
Customer Feature: How EdgeCast Delivers One Billion Imgur Images Each Day Web Hosting News 2012-05-31 12:22:36
A First Look at cPanel’s new User Interface Web Hosting News 2011-09-15 19:35:40


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?