hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Ecommerce Hosting & Discussion : Do you think 3rd party payment processors turn customers off?
Reply

Ecommerce Hosting & Discussion Review web hosting payment processors, payment systems, merchant accounts, online banking, shopping carts and billing systems for ecommerce solutions. NOTICE: No offers or contact requests of any kind allowed.
Forum Jump

Do you think 3rd party payment processors turn customers off?

View Poll Results: 3rd Party payment processors help or hurt your sales? Please vote.
Convenient, cost-effective, and help in growing sales! 9 18.37%
Convenient but turn customers away and hurt your sales! 17 34.69%
Makes no difference to customer if you are with 3rd party processor or you have your own merchant account! 13 26.53%
Sales depend on your products and prices, not any thing else! 10 20.41%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Post New Thread In Ecommerce Hosting & Discussion Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2003, 06:01 PM
rickkumar rickkumar is offline
Aspiring Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 433
*

Do you think 3rd party payment processors turn customers off?


Hello,

Do you think that 3rd party payment processors such as 2CheckOut., PaySystems, PayPal turn your potential customers off?

Do you think customers are more inclined to buy from your site if you have your own merchant account?

Or Do you think the 3rd party processors are infact better for achieving higher sales?

PS. In our case, all our (dating site) subscriptions are going to be recurring. People always say that 3rd party processors encourage cancellation by sending emails to customers before each 'renewal' and that emails have 'cancellation' link in them.

That may be true but doesn't it help to avoid chargebacks/refunds etc which can cost as much as $25 per incident?

I mean are the 3rd party processors really that bad for recurring sales? How is your experience in general for any product and in particular for recurring sales such as memberships and subscriptions?

Please share your experience.

Thanks.

Rick Kumar


Last edited by rickkumar; 12-10-2003 at 09:42 PM.
Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 12-10-2003, 06:14 PM
Incognito Incognito is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,126
Yes and no

Some are turned off. However, others are actually attracted by the fact that they feel they are giving the information to a trusted party and the some of the more knowledgeable like the ease of cancelling recurring payments with the third party processors.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2003, 08:46 PM
rickkumar rickkumar is offline
Aspiring Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 433
Re: Yes and no

Quote:
Originally posted by Incognito
Some are turned off. However, others are actually attracted by the fact that they feel they are giving the information to a trusted party and the some of the more knowledgeable like the ease of cancelling recurring payments with the third party processors.
"This ease of cancelling the recurring payments is my biggest concern"

as ours is going to be a recurring subscriptions based business model just like other dating sites.

I confirmed with 2CO (other 3rd party processors do the same as well) and they said they do send a cancellation link every time few days before renewal. They told me it protects them and vendors from 'expensive' chargebacks later on.

There is some truth to that statement but I still don't like the fact that they infact 'encourage' the customer to cancel the subscription which otherwise may or may not get cancelled.

Well lets see what others have to say.

Thanks.


Last edited by rickkumar; 12-10-2003 at 09:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 12-10-2003, 09:26 PM
Aussie Bob Aussie Bob is offline
Older than the Internet
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 23,854
Re: Yes and no

Quote:
Originally posted by Incognito
Some are turned off. However, others are actually attracted by the fact that they feel they are giving the information to a trusted party and the some of the more knowledgeable like the ease of cancelling recurring payments with the third party processors.
Yes, I agree. This goes a long way to ease some customer's concerns about the worrys of online transactions.

__________________
AussieHost.com Aussie Bob, host since 2001
Host Multiple Domains on Fast Australian Servers!!

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2003, 09:32 PM
CrazyTech CrazyTech is offline
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 3,675
I concur as well. The attracting factor is the fact that the 3rd party payment processor provides an unbiased middle man that one is much less likely to have trouble with if things go wrong. They're more inclined to work out issues and don't have all that much in it if things go wrong, so they won't delay and refuse to give the money back.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2003, 09:35 PM
CybexHost CybexHost is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,030
Quote:
Originally posted by CrazyTech
I concur as well. The attracting factor is the fact that the 3rd party payment processor provides an unbiased middle man that one is much less likely to have trouble with if things go wrong. They're more inclined to work out issues and don't have all that much in it if things go wrong, so they won't delay and refuse to give the money back.
Yes, I like the idea of a middle-man. That's a good way to put it. It also lowers startup costs for new hosts. I think 3rd party payment processors are a great way to encourage sales and integrity.

__________________
CybexHost.com - Shared and Reseller Hosting Solutions on cPanel/WHM Linux Servers
ModernTweak.com - Discount ModernBill Licenses, Hosted Installations, and Professional Services
:: Pay for your discount ModernBill license with PayPal
:: admin[at]cybexhost.com :: AIM: CybexH

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2003, 10:02 PM
rickkumar rickkumar is offline
Aspiring Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally posted by cybexhost
Yes, I like the idea of a middle-man. That's a good way to put it. It also lowers startup costs for new hosts. I think 3rd party payment processors are a great way to encourage sales and integrity.
I agree with you on that one.

What are your views about the fact 3rd pary processors make it easier to cancel recurring payments for items such as subscriptions/memberships etc.?

Do you think it actually helps avoid expensive chargebacks/refunds later on (thats what 2CO tells me)?

Thanks.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2003, 10:25 PM
cdgcommerce cdgcommerce is offline
The E-Commerce Answer Guy
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,351
I would agree that third party processors have their place in the market. For a merchant who will process only small, sporadic amounts of money or for an international merchant - I think they are a great fit, in fact.

However, based on the feedback that I have heard from many merchants and end users over the years - I think there are many more people who are "turned off" by 3rd party payment pages than those that find it to be "more comforting."

In the minds of a lot of consumers, when a merchant has their own fully branded merchant account as opposed to a PayPal link or 2CO link... it reflects that they are a more established & credible company in their minds.

All that being said - I don't think that there is anything wrong with offering -multiple- payment options. (i.e. "Pay here by Credit Card or Pay here via PayPal" etc.)

Now, in terms of recurring billing... it makes sense why these companies make it easy for people to cancel. Since they are running all transactions through one master account - too many chargebacks could put them out of business.

However, if you have your own merchant account - you can certainly do the same exact thing. The nice thing is that you can control every aspect of it instead of being relegated to doing things a "set way" with a third party processor.

This way you can have the cancellation option formatted and presented in exactly the way you want so as not to almost "push" customers to cancel but rather just to make it clear that if they ever desire to cancel, it is easy to do.

__________________
CDGcommerce.com - Trusted Merchant Account Solutions since 1998
Many thousands of successful, growing businesses benefit from our expertise every day. You can, too!
We help merchants to eliminate gateway costs, reduce & mitigate fraud and achieve streamlined PCI compliance.
Learn more today at http://www.cdgcommerce.com - we look forward to helping your business grow!

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2003, 10:29 PM
rickkumar rickkumar is offline
Aspiring Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally posted by cdgcommerce
I would agree that third party processors have their place in the market. For a merchant who will process only small, sporadic amounts of money or for an international merchant - I think they are a great fit, in fact.
Do you mean to say that most people who go with 3rd party are not regular or high volume sellers?

Thanks.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2003, 10:30 PM
thedavid thedavid is offline
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hot, hot Michigan...
Posts: 3,506
I think what he meant to say is that for higher volumes, the right merchant account is often cheaper than a 3rd party account.

-David

__________________
Ion Web Services/TronicTech
http://www.ion-web.com or Unsupported webhosting?!?
Shared hosting, Reseller accounts, Dedicated Servers, and More
Proudly hosting since 2002

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-10-2003, 10:34 PM
cdgcommerce cdgcommerce is offline
The E-Commerce Answer Guy
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,351
I was just stating that 3rd party processors are ideal for international merchants (who can't get U.S. merchant accounts) and they are also a perfect fit for merchants that do sporadic or lower volume.

For a higher volume merchant, if they are U.S. based, there are a plethora of merchant account options available in the market from various processors that provide a MUCH lower cost structure.

If a higher volume merchant is completely satisfied with their 3rd party processor - that's great. Payment processing is an important part of any business and it is important for merchants to work with a company that they feel comfortable with.

That being said, most folks that process a high volume would save quite a bit by having their own merchant account.

__________________
CDGcommerce.com - Trusted Merchant Account Solutions since 1998
Many thousands of successful, growing businesses benefit from our expertise every day. You can, too!
We help merchants to eliminate gateway costs, reduce & mitigate fraud and achieve streamlined PCI compliance.
Learn more today at http://www.cdgcommerce.com - we look forward to helping your business grow!

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-10-2003, 10:55 PM
Picard102 Picard102 is offline
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 110
Personaly, when I was looking for hosting.. it turned me off.

__________________
Sir. John Leschinski | Graphics & Design | 1 (807) 274 3225
www.platinum-hosting.com

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-11-2003, 10:38 AM
rickkumar rickkumar is offline
Aspiring Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 433
Thanks for all the responses and comments!

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-11-2003, 10:54 AM
ozzie123 ozzie123 is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: /usr/null/
Posts: 920
I believe that somehow customer would find a company with third party processor is more trusted than when they are using their branded credit card processor.

The argument is somehow like this: 3rd party processor will definitely only accept merchants with credibility (which is not entirely true, you only need a credit card with 2CO), then they believe that if your company use a 3rd party processor, you are a credible company.

Somewhat it's okay using your own credit card processor if you already have a widespread reputation. Some of the 'geeks' and techies will surely pick the one with their own processor though.

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-11-2003, 11:20 AM
rickkumar rickkumar is offline
Aspiring Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally posted by ozzie123
Somewhat it's okay using your own credit card processor if you already have a widespread reputation. Some of the 'geeks' and techies will surely pick the one with their own processor though.
I agree with you that if you talk about WHT members or other geeks and techies then yes they know enough about 3rd party processors and merchant accounts.

But what about general public or most buyers? I think they have no idea what a 'merchant account' is.

Thanks.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
Web Hosting Provider Host Cats Launches Dedicated Servers in India Web Hosting News 2012-08-24 16:10:39
Web Host Hivelocity Adds Intel Ivy Bridge, E5 and E7 Servers Web Hosting News 2012-06-04 14:58:06
Web Hosts Add New Intel E5 Romley Servers to Boost Performance by 80 Percent Web Hosting News 2012-03-09 13:56:51
Saving Money while Collecting Money with Bill Ranta and Sayid Shabeer of Litle & Co Web Hosting News 2011-08-10 22:36:08
Web Host SoftCom Achieves PCI Compliance Certification for Hosting Brands Web Hosting News 2011-08-04 20:34:10


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?