Are we at it again? Please leave religion and science alone. What you seeing (you should know that by now) in the picture is an exploding star. That is how an explosion looked when the light reached Earth. I am sure by now there is nothing there other then a white dwarf or whatever formation left after that explosion. There are so many stars in our universe (even a galaxy) that if I tell that you that a dog will appear in the sky 100 years from now I am 150% sure you will see a dog if you look at the right star. In fact, I am certain there are a lot of exploded stars that look like roses. What a coincidence you might say? It's not and I am not surprised a star looks like that, because stars can explode few times (which makes it looks like a rose). If you look at other exploding stars you'll see that they also look like roses, but they are different colors do to their chemical composition.
is a great example of a vague article. It talks about how god created a step by step process of how to create steal, but does the article quotes that part of the Quaran? No. They add arbitrary numbers.
Through out history numbers and events had a temporary link but it was purely coincidental. Scientists believed they could find more planets in our solar system, because there was a pattern between current found planet. It turned out the pattern was wrong and only worked for the first five or six discovered planets.
Please don't be so delusional people.
nozol, that quote is so vague that I just don't understand how you could have came up with this post. Read historical poetry and you can apply this picture to any poem that mentioned sky and rose. Seriously, do you see what you're doing or not?