hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Hosting Security and Technology : Snort
Reply

Hosting Security and Technology Configuring and optimizing web hosting servers and operating systems, developing administration scripts, building servers, protecting against hackers, and general security (SSL certificates, etc.)
Forum Jump

Snort

Reply Post New Thread In Hosting Security and Technology Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-23-2003, 01:41 AM
DD-SNC DD-SNC is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 825

Snort


Does anyone use it and care to give me some more information about it? I would like to see it in action to get a better idea of exactly how it works.

__________________
Devon Dunham (Owner, Sharpnet/DDoS Host)
Advanced DDoS Mitigation and Server Management Solutions

Protecting your online infrastructure.

Est. 1998.


Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 06-23-2003, 02:01 AM
bonnmac bonnmac is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tehachapi, Ca
Posts: 812
I use it, and like it. It can really give you alot of information. But you have to check the logs. It's not something you just set up and forget about. http://www.snort.org/

__________________
Bonnie - http://ansmediagroup.com - http://peachydomains.com
Hosting since Aug 3, 2002 - Domain Registration since Feb 26, 2003
Former CredibleHost clients can access their domains at http://access.enom.com to update their dns entries. I may be contacted for any reaons by emailing me through these forums.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2003, 02:31 AM
clockwork clockwork is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 574
Re: Snort

Quote:
Originally posted by DD-SNC
Does anyone use it and care to give me some more information about it? I would like to see it in action to get a better idea of exactly how it works.


In a nutshell it inspects packets and then compares it to its own signatures (think of it as a fingerprint in a networked world) and anomoly detection. It's a reporting tool by default, it isn't pro-active unless you make it such.

Unless you've read the docs, it's a bit of a pain to set up exactly the way you want it to be.

And if you run it on a system that does other things as well (read: hosts customers) then you need a swift kick in the rear.

I'd recommend putting in on a switch port that is set up to do mirroring (aka monitoring) of other switch ports, then it can passively collect data for your consumption.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 06-23-2003, 06:15 AM
DD-SNC DD-SNC is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 825
Very well written. Thanks guys..

__________________
Devon Dunham (Owner, Sharpnet/DDoS Host)
Advanced DDoS Mitigation and Server Management Solutions

Protecting your online infrastructure.

Est. 1998.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-23-2003, 11:36 AM
sethgarnar sethgarnar is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 267
Quote:
I'd recommend putting in on a switch port that is set up to do mirroring (aka monitoring) of other switch ports, then it can passively collect data for your consumption.
Could do that, but the best way is to use a tap.

Snort is great, you can log your data to mysql and use acid to look at everything, you can be alerted by e-mail pager, and a slew of other options.

I have tested to a small degree IDS+R with snort and it was cool, you can have it add rules to drop people on your linux servers and even it can drop people on a PIX.


Last edited by sethgarnar; 06-23-2003 at 02:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2003, 01:05 PM
eBoundary eBoundary is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 968
Re: Re: Snort

Quote:

And if you run it on a system that does other things as well (read: hosts customers) then you need a swift kick in the rear.

I'd recommend putting in on a switch port that is set up to do mirroring (aka monitoring) of other switch ports, then it can passively collect data for your consumption. [/B]
There is absolutely nothing wrong with running snort as a host based IDS instead of a network based IDS ( specially when you do not have access to a Tap/span port or have a single server you wish to monitor), if you secure your server properly, set the permissions on files and directories properly and maintain the system effectivly then you have nothing to worry about. Granted I log all of my host based IDS's to a dedicated logging system/syslog server/Database but this is purely for ease managment, having 40-50 IDS's logging to local systems would just be unbearable

__________________
http://www.eBoundary.com - Let us help you expand your eBoundaries!
Fast, Secure and reliable FreeBSD shared, reseller and dedicated hosting.
FREE Peace of mind with every account!

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-24-2003, 11:39 PM
clockwork clockwork is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 574
Re: Re: Re: Snort

Quote:
Originally posted by eBoundary
There is absolutely nothing wrong with running snort as a host based IDS instead of a network based IDS
I care about the integrity of the data collected.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2003, 11:47 PM
eBoundary eBoundary is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 968
Re: Re: Re: Re: Snort

Quote:
Originally posted by clockwork
I care about the integrity of the data collected.
Like i said, providing the host is secure then there is nothing wrong with it.

For hosts that do not have access to Span ports or network taps dont you think it's better to have SOME information about the traffic hitting the box rather than absolutely none?

If you log to a remote server then the the data integrity is assured.

Keeping the data on the host its logging on is risky but like i said, something is better than nothing if you dont have access to the traffic before it hits your server.

__________________
http://www.eBoundary.com - Let us help you expand your eBoundaries!
Fast, Secure and reliable FreeBSD shared, reseller and dedicated hosting.
FREE Peace of mind with every account!

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-25-2003, 02:19 AM
clockwork clockwork is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 574
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Snort

Quote:
Originally posted by eBoundary
Like i said, providing the host is secure then there is nothing wrong with it.
Secure as in services running on the box, ips being bound to the box, etc?

You can look at traffic without having a *routeable* ip bound to the box.

Do you also recommend putting a firewall on a single box meant to protect itself?



It really sounds like you're making excuses for small shops here, security should not be an afterthought or something that only would be incorporated if convenient (like installing Snort on a machine that serves customers).

All in all, any DECENT data center can set you up with a box on a port that does spanning of your other ports in use. It's just a matter of how you value security.


This is turning into My Security Policy vs. Your Security Policy now. wee!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?