Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1

    Need a dedicated server (dual xeon) with minimal ping to Brazil

    Need a dedicated server with minimal ping to Brazil.

    2 x Xeon /32 GB RAM / 4 x 300GB SAS RAID 10


    Pings above 120ms+ are not necessary

    Send ping and trace to ip address 186.234.211.20

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    280
    What is your budget?

  3. #3
    DO you have any specifications as to your connection speed and bandwidth requirements?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    52
    Specify what location you need?

    Thanking you

  5. #5
    Based on his latency requirements it looks like he's going to be limited to Miami and the surrounding area.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,054
    To get that kind of latency to Brazil a provider in Florida is going to be the best bet.

  7. #7
    Yes, Miami is now the best ping.
    Who will show lower ping?
    Need a stable DC, with normal prices
    --

    Location - any
    BW 100mbit shared unlim
    budget - ($500 (1 piece)) Need 1-6 pieces dedicated servers

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    280
    It's a shame the ping is so important to you. I'm getting average 250ms over here which still isn't bad at all!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    5,158
    Quote Originally Posted by UnitWeb View Post
    Yes, Miami is now the best ping.
    Who will show lower ping?
    Need a stable DC, with normal prices
    --

    Location - any
    BW 100mbit shared unlim
    budget - ($500 (1 piece)) Need 1-6 pieces dedicated servers
    You shouldn't have any issue finding a provider with your budget, make sure you do your research before choosing a provider.. good luck

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    /usr/bin/kvm
    Posts
    248
    Hostdime has great connectivity to South America. They have Miami NOTA peering.

    You can check the latency and speeds here: http://www.hostdime.com/facilities/speed-test/

    We have been working with them for quite some time now. They have been great so far. Very knowledgeable and helpful support staff. Friendly sales reps. Great network.

    Oktay

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    WHT Brasil
    Posts
    303
    Quote Originally Posted by UnitWeb View Post
    Yes, Miami is now the best ping.
    Who will show lower ping?
    Need a stable DC, with normal prices
    --

    Location - any
    BW 100mbit shared unlim
    budget - ($500 (1 piece)) Need 1-6 pieces dedicated servers
    not always, may vary widely from the city of your client and the ISP used, you can find in about 180ms that will cover all of Brazil better

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    75

    Arrow

    Quote Originally Posted by UnitWeb View Post
    Need a dedicated server with minimal ping to Brazil.

    2 x Xeon /32 GB RAM / 4 x 300GB SAS RAID 10


    Pings above 120ms+ are not necessary

    Send ping and trace to ip address 186.234.211.20
    Did you find the best latency that feels your needs?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    274
    Quote Originally Posted by UnitWeb View Post
    Need a dedicated server with minimal ping to Brazil.

    2 x Xeon /32 GB RAM / 4 x 300GB SAS RAID 10


    Pings above 120ms+ are not necessary

    Send ping and trace to ip address 186.234.211.20
    i get 140ms from Dallas (ed: but it goes through Miami, 30ms for that, so I guess you can find something in Miami at around 110-115ms)

    you can look at traceroute.org or go through the peeringdb at www.peeringdb.com
    Last edited by Zevus; 02-04-2014 at 05:54 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    274
    It looks to me like they all route through Spain?... so anywhere on the east coast would probably be about the same?

    this is from equinix-NY, btw

    traceroute to 186.234.211.20 (186.234.211.20), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
    1 router.lga.woodynet.net (74.80.116.1) 1.234 ms 1.375 ms 1.442 ms
    2 xe-1-1.r00.nycmny12.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.198.149) 0.515 ms 0.512 ms 0.512 ms
    3 xe-2-0-11.r23.nycmny01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.222) 0.477 ms 0.471 ms 0.523 ms
    4 ae-9.r20.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.149) 6.405 ms 6.390 ms 6.341 ms
    5 ae-1.r04.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.17) 6.575 ms 6.811 ms 6.742 ms
    6 xe-4.telefonica-data.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.9.181) 6.183 ms 6.271 ms xe-5.telefonica-data.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.9.183) 6.055 ms
    7 Xe8-0-0-0-grtmiabr4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (176.52.249.250) 29.701 ms Te0-0-0-8-grtmiabr5.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (176.52.249.109) 30.717 ms Te0-1-0-6-grtmiabr6.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (176.52.251.66) 32.443 ms
    8 Te-0-5-0-9-grtmiabr6.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (213.140.37.18) 33.544 ms Xe2-1-1-0-grtriotw1.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (176.52.248.61) 137.258 ms Xe1-1-1-0-grtriotw1.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (176.52.248.57) 200.196 ms
    9 Xe1-1-3-0-grtriotw1.red.telefonica-wholesale.net (176.52.248.93) 197.270 ms TELESP-1-0-0-101-GRTRIOTW1.7.16.84.in-addr.arpa (84.16.7.70) 142.571 ms 140.107 ms
    10 187-100-52-238.dsl.telesp.net.br (187.100.52.238) 140.484 ms 187-100-52-202.dsl.telesp.net.br (187.100.52.202) 155.550 ms 187-100-52-218.dsl.telesp.net.br (187.100.52.218) 140.088 ms
    11 187-100-53-222.dsl.telesp.net.br (187.100.53.222) 140.645 ms 140.639 ms 187-100-53-214.dsl.telesp.net.br (187.100.53.214) 143.084 ms
    12 200-204-232-30.customer.telesp.net.br (200.204.232.30) 129.692 ms 127.126 ms 129.793 ms
    13 200-147-29-179.static.uol.com.br (200.147.29.179) 127.745 ms 130.024 ms 127.710 ms

    this is from equinix ashburn, va (this via global crossing)

    traceroute to 186.234.211.20 (186.234.211.20), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
    1 router.iad.woodynet.net (74.80.112.1) 1.300 ms 1.349 ms 1.533 ms
    2 gigabitethernet9-3.ar5.dca3.gblx.net (208.178.194.125) 0.407 ms 0.370 ms 0.593 ms
    3 uol-1.asr1.GRU1.gblx.net (64.215.195.94) 127.904 ms 127.868 ms 127.851 ms
    4 200-147-26-131.static.uol.com.br (200.147.26.131) 131.965 ms 132.660 ms 132.085 ms
    5 200-147-29-171.static.uol.com.br (200.147.29.171) 133.269 ms 133.413 ms 133.923 ms
    Last edited by Zevus; 02-04-2014 at 06:31 PM.

  15. #15
    DC interested in Miami

  16. #16
    Why Miami if you can get server in Brazil? I know Maxihost is good at servers there.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,054
    Servers in Brazil will cost him easily 2-3 times the cost of USA bandwidth in Brazil is still actively sold for $50/1mbps and thats considering competitive

    Also UnitWeb mentioned he wanted 100mbps shared between the servers, 100mbps in Brazil can easily run you a lone $4,000.00/month

    BTW We talk from experience because we have 2 data centers in Brazil and know the market pretty well. This is the reason we offer clients options in Florida and many find it cheaper and within their latency needs

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    28
    Yes, your best option in Brazil is to have services in Miami.
    If I recall correctly the MI3 cable to Brazil makes landfall in Boca Raton so the new Equinix data center there is an option as well.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    2,131
    There is no chance you get <130ms ping on a steady pattern. Even to Miami. Unless you are in the Northeast and somehow directly connected to Fortaleza without going down south. From Rio or SP you cannot expect 115 or even 125ms (maybe once in a blue moon).
    And this using Oi. Forget about it if you need to reach Telefonica.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    75

    *

    Quote Originally Posted by cresci View Post
    There is no chance you get <130ms ping on a steady pattern. Even to Miami. Unless you are in the Northeast and somehow directly connected to Fortaleza without going down south. From Rio or SP you cannot expect 115 or even 125ms (maybe once in a blue moon).
    And this using Oi. Forget about it if you need to reach Telefonica.

    PING 186.234.211.20 (186.234.211.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=1 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=107 ms
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=2 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=249 time=108 ms
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=3 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=249 time=107 ms
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=4 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=249 time=107 ms
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=5 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=249 time=107 ms

    --- 186.234.211.20 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4017ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 107.604/107.865/108.174/0.356 ms

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    75

    *

    Quote Originally Posted by UnitWeb View Post
    Need a dedicated server with minimal ping to Brazil.

    2 x Xeon /32 GB RAM / 4 x 300GB SAS RAID 10


    Pings above 120ms+ are not necessary

    Send ping and trace to ip address 186.234.211.20
    PING 186.234.211.20 (186.234.211.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=1 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=107 ms
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=2 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=249 time=108 ms
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=3 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=249 time=107 ms
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=4 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=249 time=107 ms
    From 204.16.0.8: icmp_seq=5 Redirect Host(New nexthop: 204.16.0.104)
    64 bytes from 186.234.211.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=249 time=107 ms

    --- 186.234.211.20 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4017ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 107.604/107.865/108.174/0.356 ms

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    2,131
    PS: 186.234.211.20 is a corporate network under UOL Diveo. Forget it on DSL/Cable/3G/wifi eyeballs.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by cresci View Post
    PS: 186.234.211.20 is a corporate network under UOL Diveo. Forget it on DSL/Cable/3G/wifi eyeballs.
    did don't know, give your IP in brazil to test

  24. #24
    Have you considered looking in the Southwest United States anywhere? I ran a ping and a trace from a couple places and they both got routed out through Dallas - maybe that would be a good place to check.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-03-2013, 02:22 AM
  2. Brazil/South America Dedicated Servers - Make a POP in Brazil
    By maxihost in forum Dedicated Hosting Offers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-20-2013, 08:56 AM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-20-2011, 12:23 PM
  4. Dedicated Server with low ping from Brazil
    By bmorejon in forum Dedicated Server
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-11-2007, 11:06 PM
  5. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-23-2006, 04:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •