Results 51 to 75 of 308
-
08-23-2012, 01:24 AM #51Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 8,535
-
08-23-2012, 03:14 AM #52Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 10,710
I'm just arguing that disk space is something that is finitely limited and not measured over a period of time like bandwidth/data transfer. It's a VERY different resource allocation. I can see how data transfer can be unlimited, but cannot see a case for unlimited space. Sure, you can rely on the fact that most people won't use much and make it work decently well. But that doesn't change the fact that it will be misleading for some people. I'd prefer not to see the industry go in this direction.
For example, if I say the customer gets unlimited data transfer and a 10mbps upstream/downstream allocated to their account, that makes perfect sense. They can push as much as they want at the speed of 10mbps. That works out to about 330GB in a month, so it's limited natively. Disk space has nothing to do with time, however. Advertising unlimited space and then putting tons of hard limits (which would NOT be necessary if you didn't give a ridiculous allocation) is confusing for the customer IMO.Last edited by layer0; 08-23-2012 at 03:19 AM.
-
08-23-2012, 07:15 AM #53Web Host Reviewer
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kepler 62f
- Posts
- 16,699
Unlimited hosts purposely use vague language. It gives them lots of leeway to enforce policies at will. Customers are often treated differently. You'll find somebody suspended for having a dozen MP3 files, while another person has 100 and claims everything is "just fine".
It's ridiculous.
-
08-23-2012, 08:39 AM #54Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
But this is not an issue for 99.99% of websites suitable for a shared hosting environment. There are just as many customers that are mislead through lack of knowldge of all hosting plans. Due to multi-tiered pricing structure how many buy a 5gb plan when all they need is a 2Gb plan? Many of them will sell additional disk space beyond the quota. Is it misleading to advertise that -- unlimited on the installment plan?
I can invent just as many scenarios rendering the multi-tiered quota-based plan confusing as you can for unlimited plan. That proves nothing.
You are applying a double-standard and defining the business based on the 0.01% it may not work for instead of the 99.99% it does. So far the only real-world problem you've been able to come up with is that your pdf archival system had to go on a clustered server instead of a $5/mo unlimited plan -- and then you criticise the unlimited plan host for not allowing that on a shared server environment. Essentially my challenge remains unanswered (I have brougbht it up in other threads), and your argument remains a straw man.Last edited by Collabora; 08-23-2012 at 08:50 AM.
-
08-23-2012, 11:08 AM #55
-
08-23-2012, 11:54 AM #56Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 10,710
All it comes down to is one host is telling the customer upfront they can use 5GB, or 10GB, or whatever the limit is. That's simple and makes a lot of sense. When you buy a VPS or dedicated server, it's generally a hard limit on disk space too (and go figure, this tends more often to be a realistic limit, and not nearly as oversold as some shared environments are - speaking in terms of VPS).
When you tell the customer they can use unlimited space, but then have a bunch of fine print limiting that usage, it's a lot more confusing to the customer than to just give them a hard limit. And I am sure this would be confusing to way more than 0.1% of people.
Except a proxy uses bandwidth, so that'd be naturally limited there, at a "limited" host.
Other than that, a proxy site shouldn't really slow down the server or harm the other users "too" much. So, I don't see how a proxy is relevant here.
-
08-23-2012, 12:13 PM #57
-
08-23-2012, 01:36 PM #58Location = SoapBox
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 6,564
@Collabora - I have recently (last year or so) - come more around to your way of thinking on these sorts of things. Because honestly, you are right. Any provider, regardless of model, could be just as misleading as any other provider. There are good providers, and not good providers - and business model doesnt really matter as much.
having said this, its hard to argue @layer0's comments re diskspace. It is something different.
but, even on disk space, which is something we fight against all the time - how does a consumer understand the difference between host a) offering massive disk space on a SATA with no redundancy and no real backups to host b) with raid10, 8 spindles sas, with backups to different raid10 devices, etc.. (extreme examples in both cases to represent both ends of the spectrum)
the problem really is - as it pertains to this thread - is we dont have rules to specify how a host must have his disk configured and what their model is - its buyer beware. so, why is WHT involved in other areas.. as, even though I dont like the unlimited disk space and bandwidth offerings in shared hosting.. fact remains, there are much worse things going on in this industry then that.. I would rather have a good, stable company with unlimited plans vs a fly by night company with limited plans who cant deliver on those plans at all (again, extreme examples)
-
08-23-2012, 03:21 PM #59
-
08-23-2012, 03:22 PM #60Web Host Reviewer
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kepler 62f
- Posts
- 16,699
There's no such thing as a "limited host". That's a term Collabora invented and does his best to inject into the local vernacular. Don't give into it, because it's even more divorced from reality than "unlimited" is.
You have two kinds of hosts:
- Those that specify resources.
- Those that do not. The ones that do not almost always advertise it as "unlimited" and then stuff content-based limits into fine print, and with vague language that is very anti-consumer.
-
08-23-2012, 03:25 PM #61
-
08-23-2012, 03:27 PM #62Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 10,710
kpmedia, I agree with your point. If unlimited hosts actually stated ALL of the restrictions with the plan itself, then that'd be fine. State right on the plan page on your website that there is X% CPU limitation, content type limitation, usage limitation, etc. Only problem then is they won't get nearly as much business as people would realize how much of a bait and switch it really is.
The PHYSICAL limit of space on a hard disk is anything but artificial, but good try.
-
08-23-2012, 03:34 PM #63
-
08-23-2012, 03:37 PM #64Web Host Reviewer
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kepler 62f
- Posts
- 16,699
That doesn't even make sense.
A disk, or even an array of disks, has a hard limit. By your logic (definition), all hosts are "limited" hosts, but some choose to lie about it. That's where the "unlimited hard drive" argument comes from -- even if it is silly, it's a silly response to a silly position.
A "resource", by definition, is finite. Oil, electricity, water, etc. This is why virtually all resources are billed by usage, or put into a "plan" that allocated a maximum usage.
Ways to use resources are not limits. Limiting a database is artificial, as would be limiting the number of ice cubes you can make with your water utility.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The argument that banning unlimited somehow "stifles innovation" also doesn't make any sense. What innovation?
Innovation would be --- for an example --- to develop an auto-upgrade plugin to cPanel servers (moderated by host) that would allow space growth, yet in a managed manner. Hosts can advertise the starting limit, and then a feature could be 5GB added increments for free, pending approval. It would even have to be requested -- just something that kicks in at a 4GB usage (assuming 5GB is the starting point).
Or something like that. (My idea is still rough, but it's a hell of a lot better than "Unlimited, Whheeee! Yeehaw!!!!")
Innovate that.Last edited by kpmedia; 08-23-2012 at 03:40 PM.
-
08-23-2012, 03:42 PM #65
-
08-23-2012, 03:47 PM #66Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
You are about the only one that has ever given me a rational, non-contradictory reason for not providing it (for the readers: his reasons were based on cost per unit hosting and management considerations).
but, even on disk space, which is something we fight against all the time - how does a consumer understand the difference between host a) offering massive disk space on a SATA with no redundancy and no real backups to host b) with raid10, 8 spindles sas, with backups to different raid10 devices, etc.. (extreme examples in both cases to represent both ends of the spectrum)
That's why my usual advice to them is look for a host that has been around for a few years meeting a payroll. Chances are host (a) above will never make it that far.
the problem really is - as it pertains to this thread - is we dont have rules to specify how a host must have his disk configured and what their model is - its buyer beware. so, why is WHT involved in other areas.. as, even though I dont like the unlimited disk space and bandwidth offerings in shared hosting.. fact remains, there are much worse things going on in this industry then that.. I would rather have a good, stable company with unlimited plans vs a fly by night company with limited plans who cant deliver on those plans at all (again, extreme examples)
I wrote in another thread that you won't see much innovation in a forum like this. The rules are created to preserve orthodoxy. Most hosts and incipient hosts come here to learn or copy from each other. Inbreeding will never improve the gene pool.
-
08-23-2012, 03:47 PM #67Web Host Reviewer
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kepler 62f
- Posts
- 16,699
Resources limits are NOT a "marketing term". Hard limits actually exist.
"Unlimited" is a marketing term. And a shady one, at that, when limits are hidden in fine print.
"Quota-less" is playing semantics.
How about we innovate the industry by stopping the "unlimited" lie?
-
08-23-2012, 04:01 PM #68
Quota-less is just a more acurate term. I never said resouce limits (the physical ones) are a marketing term.
I think we should strive to offer different types of plans for those with different requirements. What's wrong with offering no quota of disk space if CPU, allowed files, and inodes are clearly defined?
I really don't think that WHT should have a say in what configuration is right or wrong.
-
08-23-2012, 04:59 PM #69Cloud & Web Hosting Specialist
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 4,332
Agreed. Such limits should be clearly shown in the hosting plan page in their website and also in their advertisements at WHT.
[[[Removed and Removed]]]
@Mods: You are free to remove the links above if you this is considered as self-promo but I am just trying to show an example and make a point.Last edited by SoftWareRevue; 08-25-2012 at 11:43 AM. Reason: Links Removed
-
08-23-2012, 05:36 PM #70Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
-
08-23-2012, 05:47 PM #71Location = SoapBox
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 6,564
well, to be fair here, there is a difference...
example A - unlimited space, unlimited sites - define
example B - 2GB space, unlimited sites - define
the difference is that there is a specified and fairly well understood limit in example B - ie 2GB. so, a rational person could quantify that unlimited sites is limited by that 2GB.
its exactly like cell phone providers who advertise unlimited weekend minutes for example. well, any rational person would understand that the "unlimited" is limited by the number of minutes in a weekend.
it is frustrating though - we tried to specify CPU, RAM and IO limits on shared hosting - which are MORE then reasonable. I mean I dont know ANY shared provider giving those sorts of resources to individual accounts in shared hosting - and the general consumer thinks we are giving them less then everybody else and charging more.. (Im not complaining, just stating a fact).
so, I see why it would be really difficult for people with an "unlimited" model to start posting restriction in their ads - especially when no one else does..
theres no easy solution - but, since we have gone the route of "buyer beware" anyway - I dont see why we should be restricting providers from advertising whatever they want - and rather, we should spend our efforts educating consumers. Sadly, today - consumers mostly learn through trial and error. I know our entire business and business model is built on the 2nd or 3rd time hosting customer. is) we aim for more savvy customers - those who will better appreciate the value we bring to the table.. but, this doesnt mean I want to ban other models nor think we should ban them - again, we should spend our time educating consumers, not causing further confusion with rules which explicitly promote even more confusion as people get creative to bi-pass forum rules..
-
08-23-2012, 05:59 PM #72Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
Yes, all that is well and good. But I was using the logic and context of the poster and anti-unlimited crowd who are refusing to see disk space in terms of quota instead of hardware.
We can similarly say a rational person would know that unlimited space refers to the quota imposed by the provider and not an infinitely large hard drive. Yet, the anti-unlimited crowd contintually beats the "unlimted hard drive" drum.
I can't begin to tell you how many times a host will spew the "there is no such thing as unlimited" while offering unlimited hosting resources, justifying his while rejecting the same justification for the other.
-
08-23-2012, 06:24 PM #73
A 'rational person' wouldn't even consider unlimited offers as they are scams.
When it comes to hard drives, there IS no such thing as unlimited. There IS no infinite hard drive. Hard drives have limits, therefore, to say you have "unlimited space available" is, indeed a lie
-
08-23-2012, 06:26 PM #74Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
^^^See what I mean^^^
And this guy is an actual tech and has probably actually configured quotas so he should know better. I'm a Windows tech and even I know that in linux setting up a user with a disk quota = 0 is the same as No Limit which is the same as unlimited. This can be done on any size hard drive. Thus to claim unlimited disk quota requires unlimited hard drive is the lieLast edited by Collabora; 08-23-2012 at 06:35 PM.
-
08-23-2012, 08:31 PM #75Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 10,710
Obviously you can set no quota on an account. That's really convenient and this functionality exists for a reason. But what customer knows the difference between quota and space?
Look, we know YOU understand how to look at an unlimited host and figure out what's really being offered and obviously then you will not get the wrong impression. Most of the people in this thread (in fact, maybe even all) understand this very well too. But actual end-users are probably not going to understand this as well. Try explaining to somebody who doesn't know much about hosting what the difference between unlimited disk quota vs unlimited disk space is - I don't think they'll understand without some actual hosting (or Linux) background.
My point all along is that setting a limit like 5GB disk space is a very distinct and finite limit that makes sense to people. When people go and buy an iPad from Apple, it doesn't come with unlimited space - same for just about any electronic device purchase. People understand very well what a space limitation is - when you tell them that all of a sudden they have unlimited space and put a bunch of limits in the ToS, that's vastly different from saying they can have unlimited sites in the account, or unlimited databases, etc.
It's all about perception and what is clear to the customer.Last edited by layer0; 08-23-2012 at 08:34 PM.
Similar Threads
-
CentOS after some time completely stop resolving some hostnames
By bratao in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 3Last Post: 10-09-2008, 01:38 PM -
Stop Right There! Fully Managed Servers! $10 Life-Time Reduction! LIMITED TIME ONLY!
By WolvTheHero in forum Dedicated Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 01-28-2008, 12:26 PM -
OK. It is time to stop and think about ordering
By Ganah ALLAN in forum Design OffersReplies: 5Last Post: 01-03-2006, 12:28 PM -
how to stop/change time for cron.daily
By WCHost in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 5Last Post: 11-06-2004, 10:06 AM