Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 308
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Kepler 62f
    Posts
    16,699
    Quote Originally Posted by Collabora View Post
    Hosting plans are a list of features limited by artificial and sometimes arbitrary quotas. Its the absence of these quota that makes it unlimited.
    Then "unlimited" hosts need to quit hide back-door limits in fine print documents.

    I see too many "unlimited" hosts restricting content that would be perfectly fine at what you refer to as a "limited" host. Now who's limited? If I cannot put a 1GB ISO file into my account (not linked to any public web page) at an "unlimited" host, but I can do so at my so-called "limited" (resources specified) host, then what do you say to that?

    Let's also not confuse services with resources...

    Email, databases, FTP accounts, domains, etc -- no reason to limit those. Those are services.

    Hard disk, RAM, CPU, bandwidth -- those are resources.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    Quote Originally Posted by morrisonhosting View Post
    I've seen many good arguements made for unlimited hosting, how good an argument is is opinion. If it says you get an unlimited 100Mb/s shared connection what does that mean? That means they are not imposing any limits on that connection. It's a free for all on that line. I still hate when people use bandwidth for transfer. It's not bandwidth they are capping (though some hosts do) it's the transfer.

    If a hard drive is unlimited, it means it's a free for all on that drive. The balance is the fine art of the administrator.
    Well put. Sadly there still remain those who know better that continue to connect the concept of unlimited hosting plan to a physcal measurement of a physical piece of hardware rather than to usage and/or permission, which is what the host does.
    Last edited by Collabora; 08-22-2012 at 02:47 PM.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Niagara Falls, Ontario
    Posts
    3,283
    Quote Originally Posted by Collabora View Post
    Well put. Sadly there still remain those who know better that continue to connect the concept of unlimited hosting plan to a physcal measurement of a physical piece of hardware rather than to usage and/or permission, which is what the host does.
    There's no solid definition and therefore no concensus. It's like cloud hosting. We all know what it should be, but regardless people will keep on offering servers in a datacenter with a mural of clouds as cloud hosting.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    Quote Originally Posted by kpmedia View Post
    I see too many "unlimited" hosts restricting content that would be perfectly fine at what you refer to as a "limited" host. Now who's limited? If I cannot put a 1GB ISO file into my account (not linked to any public web page) at an "unlimited" host, but I can do so at my so-called "limited" (resources specified) host, then what do you say to that?
    I would say you cannot put a 1GB ISO file into your account (not linked to any public web page) at your "unlimited" host, but you can do so at your so-called "limited" (resources specified) host

    What does that have to do with the price of tea in china? I thought we were talking about web hosting, not online file archiving and storage. If you can find a web host to store your iso files, and those of your family and neighbors that great. But web hosts are legitimately able to refuse that kind of service. All unlimited hosts (should) have that restriction in TOS/AUP; I have even seen it in limited hosts.
    Last edited by Collabora; 08-22-2012 at 03:02 PM.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Niagara Falls, Ontario
    Posts
    3,283
    Quote Originally Posted by kpmedia View Post
    Then "unlimited" hosts need to quit hide back-door limits in fine print documents.

    I see too many "unlimited" hosts restricting content that would be perfectly fine at what you refer to as a "limited" host. Now who's limited? If I cannot put a 1GB ISO file into my account (not linked to any public web page) at an "unlimited" host, but I can do so at my so-called "limited" (resources specified) host, then what do you say to that?
    I would put up the fair use clause saying that your site could be suspended if you are storing files not required to run your website. I would then post it on the product page.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,297
    Sounds like your advocating this because you want to sell an unlimited / lifetime plan.

    Nothing is unlimited and as Aaron said.. Until your truly going to give unlimited space, bandwidth, etc out then you should not be selling it as unlimited.

    What kind of marketing scheme are you going to try and run here? Unlimited something? Lifetime something?

    Going to guess that it's possible for someone to outlive the life of vps.net, then what? It's not unlimited. So you should stick to a time scale and a resource scale that is truly measurable.

    Doesn't sound like innovation, sounds more like trying to milk people for money



    Quote Originally Posted by IGobyTerry View Post
    WHT is unquestionably a leader in the hosting industry. Where else can you find CEOs of the largest companies spending the majority of their day reading and responding to forum posts? 5 years ago WHT put in place restrictions on what kind of offers hosts could make on WHT. At the time it was a great idea. It prevented customers from being taken advantage of.

    It's 2012 now - shared hosting is no longer restricted by the amount of disk space or bandwidth used. The limitations are now based on I/O, CPU and RAM. With the changes in the hosting industry, and the implementation of new technologies, such as cloud storage, all WHT is doing now is preventing industry leaders from innovating in this industry.

    It’s time to remove the restrictions and let brilliant, young minds develop new and innovative business models that undoubtedly bring changes to this industry. Changes that will be better for the longevity industry and the quality of hosting for the consumer.

    Many will object and claim that hosting offers still require regulation and oversight from WHT. I call them dinosaurs in this industry refusing to keep up with market demands.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Niagara Falls, Ontario
    Posts
    3,283
    Quote Originally Posted by Ionity View Post
    Sounds like your advocating this because you want to sell an unlimited / lifetime plan.

    Nothing is unlimited and as Aaron said.. Until your truly going to give unlimited space, bandwidth, etc out then you should not be selling it as unlimited.

    What kind of marketing scheme are you going to try and run here? Unlimited something? Lifetime something?

    Going to guess that it's possible for someone to outlive the life of vps.net, then what? It's not unlimited. So you should stick to a time scale and a resource scale that is truly measurable.

    Doesn't sound like innovation, sounds more like trying to milk people for money
    If this was a response to me, then no I'm not. I'm simply putting for my opinion both ways. If you mean Terry then have fun with that argument. If you want to sell unlimited WHT isn't the only place you go.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Kepler 62f
    Posts
    16,699
    Quote Originally Posted by morrisonhosting View Post
    I would put up the fair use clause saying that your site could be suspended if you are storing files not required to run your website. I would then post it on the product page.
    What about the hosts who have long often-vague limits?
    - No files over 512kb
    - No images, except when linked to page
    - Nothing offensive. (term not defined)

    Talk about stifling innovation. The modern web is media rich, and some of these "unlimited hosting" goons act like it's still a decade ago, in terms of how people need/want to use hosting accounts in 2012.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    Quote Originally Posted by Ionity View Post
    Sounds like your advocating this because you want to sell an unlimited / lifetime plan.
    Can't the reverse be true? Should we ban opinions of those who have a stake in the result. We can always say the same thing about the anti-unlimited..."well you don't offer it that is why you are against it....blah blah blah.

    Nothing is unlimited ......
    That is the Big Lie of the FUD marketers. Unlimited refers to the quota not the hardware. Its the limit artificially imposed by the host that becomes unlimited. By not specifying a quota, the feature subject to the quota becomes unlimited. The laws of physics still stand, the physical limit still exists. Its only the quota that does not exist.

    We come across unlimited features every day. And all of them are ultimately connected to something limited. It can be unlimited talk time limited by the number of minutes in a day, unlimited mileage limited by the length of roads and gallons of fuel, and even unlimited disk space limited by server hardware. They all have one other thing in common: what is offered as unlimited is simply the absence of the provider imposing a limit, not nature.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Niagara Falls, Ontario
    Posts
    3,283
    Quote Originally Posted by Collabora View Post
    Can't the reverse be true? Should we ban opinions of those who have a stake in the result. We can always say the same thing about the anti-unlimited..."well you don't offer it that is why you are against it....blah blah blah.



    That is the Big Lie of the FUD marketers. Unlimited refers to the quota not the hardware. Its the limit artificially imposed by the host that becomes unlimited. By not specifying a quota, the feature subject to the quota becomes unlimited. The laws of physics still stand, the physical limit still exists. Its only the quota that does not exist.

    We come across unlimited features every day. And all of them are ultimately connected to something limited. It can be unlimited talk time limited by the number of minutes in a day, unlimited mileage limited by the length of roads and gallons of fuel, and even unlimited disk space limited by server hardware. They all have one other thing in common: what is offered as unlimited is simply the absence of the provider imposing a limit, not nature.

    Just to add, if I put a hosting offer up as Quotaless, I'm fairly sure it would get removed, would it not?

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,535
    Quote Originally Posted by Ionity View Post
    Sounds like your advocating this because you want to sell an unlimited / lifetime plan.

    Nothing is unlimited and as Aaron said.. Until your truly going to give unlimited space, bandwidth, etc out then you should not be selling it as unlimited.

    What kind of marketing scheme are you going to try and run here? Unlimited something? Lifetime something?

    Going to guess that it's possible for someone to outlive the life of vps.net, then what? It's not unlimited. So you should stick to a time scale and a resource scale that is truly measurable.

    Doesn't sound like innovation, sounds more like trying to milk people for money
    I actually have no intention of running unlimited plans or lifetime hosting schemes. In fact, offering unlimited disk space would be worse for me, as my inherent costs for disk space are significantly higher than most competitors.

    What I want to do is work with the thought leaders of this industry to push us forward. We've become complacent with the existing service levels. If we want to grow and become a more powerful industry, we may need to change.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    5,105
    Do you really think "innovation" is being stifled with the lack of unlimited hard disk space?

    I don't. If all your innovation is around unlimited you are going to have some problems. The problem too is that once you let the people who know how to realistically do it advertise it, you get the race to the bottom with every host offering unlimited even though they don't have a clue how to do it.

    I like the rules as is only because I can't think of a way to write it so that the companies that can handle it are allowed to but the others can't.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    Quote Originally Posted by Coolraul View Post

    I like the rules as is only because I can't think of a way to write it so that the companies that can handle it are allowed to but the others can't.
    That's not a consideration with any other type host, and for good reason: WHT is not in the business of playing consumer watchdog. Or if you are unlimited hosting would be the least of your worries around here.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    10,710
    The thing is, if you limit I/O, CPU, and RAM like you said, somebody can still buy an account and stick many TBs of files on it. They can be larger files, so they won't even reach an inode limit. CPU and RAM usage could be super low if they're just serving up static files. How are you going to combat that? They'll probably get suspended, and that's why I think it's misleading. Obviously this isn't a typical scenario, but it can happen and that's why SOME sort of limit should be advertised. If you're going to say unlimited bandwidth, at least replace that with "unmetered/shared unmetered bandwidth" which many VPS/dedicated providers already do, along with stating the port speed. I think that's totally reasonable to offer. For disk space, however, since it really has nothing to do with usage over time like bandwidth (or more specifically data transfer), I can't see how 'unlimited' space isn't false advertising.

    Lots of people like to say that offering something like unlimited mysql databases is the same thing as unlimited space, but it's really not. If you say that the account has no limit on MySQL databases, but they are accounted for in the account's disk allocation, that is not false advertising. Even if someone created many empty databases, the resulting base directory structure of the database on the server would still consume some space, so they'd reach their disk allocation eventually. But when you advertise unlimited space, it's possible to have an obscene amount of space used before you reach any CPU, RAM limits, etc. So where's the upper limit for somebody's disk usage, unless you put in other restrictions on the types of files users can upload, etc. (which would really be misleading!)

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    Quote Originally Posted by layer0 View Post
    The thing is, if you limit I/O, CPU, and RAM like you said, somebody can still buy an account and stick many TBs of files on it. They can be larger files, so they won't even reach an inode limit. CPU and RAM usage could be super low if they're just serving up static files. How are you going to combat that
    It standard practice to limit file types to those that support a legitimate web site. You will see this mentioned in the TOS/AUP fair-usage clauses along with the usual cpu, ram limits that all hosts put there. Using the disk space for PC backups, storing mp3s, iso files, etc is considered abuse on the same level as runing a script that uses too much cpu time.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    938
    Quote Originally Posted by IGobyTerry View Post
    ...With the changes in the hosting industry, and the implementation of new technologies, such as cloud storage, all WHT is doing now is preventing industry leaders from innovating in this industry...
    Quote Originally Posted by IGobyTerry View Post
    ... Unfortunately with so many companies actively participating in discussion here, WHT has indirectly prevented hosting companies from changing what they can offer to customers. This prevents all of us from bringing innovation to old product lines, like shared hosting, and introducing new industry changing products to the market as well...
    What kind of comments are these?!

    Do you pay WHT for advertising? - No
    Does WHT owe you anything? - No

    No one is "preventing" you from moving your business into whatever market you want to try to excel in except you.

    This should not be your only or main avenue of advertising.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    10,710
    Quote Originally Posted by Collabora View Post
    It standard practice to limit file types to those that support a legitimate web site. You will see this mentioned in the TOS/AUP fair-usage clauses along with the usual cpu, ram limits that all hosts put there. Using the disk space for PC backups, storing mp3s, iso files, etc is considered abuse on the same level as runing a script that uses too much cpu time.
    I don't buy that this is a legitimate restriction though. Most providers who don't give obscene amounts of space in their plans do not have this kind of restriction. It's just a way providers have regulated ridiculous amounts of overselling.

    If I actually can afford to have a client use 10GB of space, then as a provider I wouldn't care what kind of files they store as long as they are legal. After all, fundamentally all I am doing is assigning them space on the server. Files they place in the document root ('public_html' as it's often named) are viewable from the web, but they're free to store other files too.

    Anyway, even with these restrictions, my point holds. What if I'm not backing up my PC. What if my website consists of PDFs of scanned documents (these can be large), and need to dump them all somewhere? We then once again reach the conclusion, if a provider is offering "unlimited disk space" it's possible to use obscene amounts without breaching ANY of the ToS, unless the provider starts putting in ridiculous file type restrictions - banning my PDF repository too.

    What happened to being able to buy a hosting account to host whatever I wanted unless it was illegal or I actually ran out of resources (which for a PDF repository, would NEVER happen here with unlimited space)?
    Last edited by layer0; 08-22-2012 at 10:50 PM.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    Quote Originally Posted by layer0 View Post
    I don't buy that this is a legitimate restriction though. Most providers who don't give obscene amounts of space in their plans do not have this kind of restriction.
    Of course they don't -- they don't need them. But the principle is the same: maintaining the integrity of the server via a fair usage policy. There is no law that requires hosts to use quotas to keep disk usage under control. Purposing is a perfectly legitimate alternative. If you don't like that method use quotas, no one is forcing you one way or the other.

    What if my website consists of PDFs of scanned documents (these can be large), and need to dump them all somewhere? We then once again reach the conclusion, if a provider is offering "unlimited disk space" it's possible to use obscene amounts without breaching ANY of the ToS, unless the provider starts putting in ridiculous file type restrictions - banning my PDF repository too.
    99.99% of websites suitable for a shared hosting environment will fit on a typical quota-based plan. All of those will also fit on an unlimited plan. Having to inventing a scenario that is unlikely to occur in order to point out the pitfalls of unlimited hosting strengthens the case for unlimited hosting

    Your question cannot be answered unless you can point to a plan and its TOS. I can't speak for every host regarding using disk space purposed for a web site to store massive amounts of PDFs.

    What happened to being able to buy a hosting account to host whatever I wanted unless it was illegal or I actually ran out of resources (which for a PDF repository, would NEVER happen here with unlimited space)?
    You can take a web site on a limited plan and put it on an unlimited plan and nothing will change. You keep ignoring the point of purposing and fair usage. If such purposing and fair usage does not allow you to store massive amounts of PDF files, find a host that does. The host has the final say on what you can use his servers for.

    I challenge you to point to one documented case where a legitimate web site suitable for a shared hosting environment was suspended because of an unlimited plan

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    10,710
    Quote Originally Posted by Collabora View Post
    I challenge you to point to one documented case where a legitimate web site suitable for a shared hosting environment was suspended because of an unlimited plan
    Actually, not sure how much you frequent the main web hosting forums, but this has definitely happened. As to whether you think their website is 'legitimate' is personal opinion. I think hosting many PDF documents is legitimate if that's what my site needs. And if you think that's just some invented use case - it's not. I consult for a firm who needed hosting for exactly this. We ended up using a nice dedicated cluster setup, but logically they could have just picked up a $5/mo unlimited account and not break the TOS.

    All I'm saying is when you offer unlimited disk space, there's potential for you not to reach ANY of the other limits (CPU, RAM, etc.) while still using way too much space (or attempting to) for the company to feasibly offer you. I don't care if this would be impossible on a limited plan anyway (this is obvious, there IS a limit then after all), but when you advertise unlimited, you give the customer the wrong idea.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    Quote Originally Posted by layer0 View Post
    Actually, not sure how much you frequent the main web hosting forums, but this has definitely happened.
    I frequent them quite a bit

    I haven't seen one case where the same activity would never have gotten them suspended on a limited account.

    As to whether you think their website is 'legitimate' is personal opinion.
    No, its the hosts' opinion. And described in the TOS


    I think hosting many PDF documents is legitimate if that's what my site needs. And if you think that's just some invented use case - it's not. I consult for a firm who needed hosting for exactly this. We ended up using a nice dedicated cluster setup, but logically they could have just picked up a $5/mo unlimited account and not break the TOS.
    Then you should have used them. On the other hand, an unlimited plan is not a substitute for a vps or dedicated server.

    All I'm saying is when you offer unlimited disk space, there's potential for you not to reach ANY of the other limits (CPU, RAM, etc.)
    I agree. you are going in circles now. That's why fair-usage has to extend to file purposing and even inode numbers

    I don't care if this would be impossible on a limited plan anyway (this is obvious, there IS a limit then after all), but when you advertise unlimited, you give the customer the wrong idea.
    Its no more wrong than advertising 5GB and booting him off the server at 100mb when he starts to go over 10% cpu for 60 minutes.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    10,710
    Quote Originally Posted by Collabora View Post
    I agree. you are going in circles now. That's why fair-usage has to extend to file purposing and even inode numbers
    And my point is, that's NOT necessary when you give a real limit on disk space in the first place.

    Based on a few ToS' I read, file purposing wouldn't have stopped my PDF repository from being hosted. So then what?

    Instead of the smoke and mirrors of unlimited space unless you try to host something other than X, how about just giving a real limit? You don't think that's way easier for the customer to understand?

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    Quote Originally Posted by layer0 View Post
    And my point is, that's NOT necessary [file purposing in fair-usage] when you give a real limit on disk space in the first place.
    This AUP is from an anti-unlimited limited host in this thread:

    [host] uses abuse controls to help ensure that use of our services does not adversely affect the performance of our system or other customers' sites. It is not appropriate to use an account primarily as an online storage space or for archiving electronic files.


    I've come across other limited hosts that use the same language. Certainly if limited hosts can use a policy like this then unlimited hosts can also.
    Last edited by Collabora; 08-23-2012 at 12:08 AM.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    10,710
    A lot of companies who oversell quite a bit also do that, so I'm not surprised you found a non-unlimited example. I don't consider offering 1TB space for $5 to be much different from unlimited, although it's at least slightly better.

    But frankly, how is an HTML document not an electronic file? This wording is stupid, and I'm surprised you don't see that.

    And online storage space, isn't that to some degree what web hosting is in the first place? Sure it's more specialized than that in some ways, but you ARE providing online space at the end of the day as a web host.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pacific Palisades, CA
    Posts
    3,641
    I don't think you are going to understand until you can accept that a web host is not compelled to be a Mozy

  25. #50
    this is a really complex argument. Ive been beating my head around this argument for a long long time. On one hand, disk and bandwidth arent natively limited - like minutes in a day.. so, its hard to make the argument that hosting providers can operate like cell phone providers. On the other hand, hosting is a pretty unique industry and one that is still yet to be properly defined and understood.. so, why should it operate like any other industry in the first place.

    I honestly dont know. I know in shared hosting, we offer limited plans, and we also specify hard resources limits on each plan (cpu, ram and disk IO). Im not sure if this helps us or hurts us from a shared web hosting perspective. Ive been half tempted to leave the limits on disk exactly as they are - and just change bandwidth to unlimited, along with the hard resource limits we have in place. I mean if you can push 1000GB without using more then 40% of a single CPU - all the power to you. If you can only push 10GB with that much CPU and RAM, so be it..

    not sure my post is going anywhere - or if I actually have a point to make. After all of these years, I dont think I have a viable answer or firm opinion on this one.

    I will say this though, I dont think WHT should be determining what a proper business model is. I say have at it.. at the very least, it will act as a method to further and more clearly differentiate business models. I mean is it really different seeing someone selling 400GB disk, 1TB transfer, alpha reseller with unlimited sub resellers, unlimited accounts for $2.95?

Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. CentOS after some time completely stop resolving some hostnames
    By bratao in forum Hosting Security and Technology
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-09-2008, 01:38 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-28-2008, 12:26 PM
  3. OK. It is time to stop and think about ordering
    By Ganah ALLAN in forum Design Offers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-03-2006, 12:28 PM
  4. how to stop/change time for cron.daily
    By WCHost in forum Hosting Security and Technology
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-06-2004, 10:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •