Results 1 to 25 of 308
-
08-22-2012, 11:26 AM #1Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 8,535
It's time to stop stifling innovation.
WHT is unquestionably a leader in the hosting industry. Where else can you find CEOs of the largest companies spending the majority of their day reading and responding to forum posts? 5 years ago WHT put in place restrictions on what kind of offers hosts could make on WHT. At the time it was a great idea. It prevented customers from being taken advantage of.
It's 2012 now - shared hosting is no longer restricted by the amount of disk space or bandwidth used. The limitations are now based on I/O, CPU and RAM. With the changes in the hosting industry, and the implementation of new technologies, such as cloud storage, all WHT is doing now is preventing industry leaders from innovating in this industry.
It’s time to remove the restrictions and let brilliant, young minds develop new and innovative business models that undoubtedly bring changes to this industry. Changes that will be better for the longevity industry and the quality of hosting for the consumer.
Many will object and claim that hosting offers still require regulation and oversight from WHT. I call them dinosaurs in this industry refusing to keep up with market demands.
-
08-22-2012, 11:28 AM #2The VPS Specialist
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Edinburgh/London
- Posts
- 5,789
What changes specifically do you want to see implemented?
-
08-22-2012, 11:32 AM #3Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 8,535
At the very least:
- Removal of disk space restriction
- Removal of bandwidth restrictions
- Allow lifetime hosting offers
This industry has the potential to move very quickly with the advent of new technologies. Unfortunately with so many companies actively participating in discussion here, WHT has indirectly prevented hosting companies from changing what they can offer to customers. This prevents all of us from bringing innovation to old product lines, like shared hosting, and introducing new industry changing products to the market as well.
Remove the chains and let the ideas flow!
-
08-22-2012, 11:34 AM #4Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Location
- localhost
- Posts
- 3,771
Yeah its silly not allowing unlimited offers nowadays, its was a good score to police things by ten years ago, but not the case now.
The cpanel hosts are dead in the water anyway, innovation is already happening with webfaction, heroku, dotcloud, joyent cloud, etc..
-
08-22-2012, 11:48 AM #5
-
08-22-2012, 11:58 AM #6
When I can go to the store and buy an "unlimited" hard drive and tell my bandwidth provider to put me on the "unlimited" port on their switch I will agree with you.
People offering "unlimited" resources and then limiting them in the fine print are liars and scammers.
-
08-22-2012, 11:58 AM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Miami, Florida
- Posts
- 20,777
-
08-22-2012, 12:14 PM #8Disabled
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Dub,Lon,Dal,Chi,NY,LA
- Posts
- 1,839
If there are back-end limits, then, by definition, it isn't unlimited.
Unlimited is a scam, mismarketing and misinformation. It gives hosting a bad name imho.
If you have an offer, be clear about it.
Instead of unlimited, call it 'effective unlimited, with these limits', but above all, be honest.
-
08-22-2012, 12:17 PM #9
^^ This ^^
I couldn't have said it better myself. In fact, I am pretty sure I've said the same thing over the past 10 years multiple times.
There is no such thing as 'unlimited'. Unmetered bandwidth? Yes, and WHT allows for that (IIRC). Unlimited hard drive space? Nope... That is a scam
Sure, you can link drives together in sn array, but, there is always a finite limit to how much space you have.
-
08-22-2012, 12:25 PM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
Hosting plans are a list of features limited by artificial and sometimes arbitrary quotas. Its the absence of these quota that makes it unlimited. Has nothing to do with the back end. Unlimited by definition means no limit, in other words, no quota.
Instead of unlimited, call it 'effective unlimited, with these limits', but above all, be honest.
A 1Gb web site will, all other things being equal, will experience no difference if it is on a 5GB plan or an unlimited plan. There is nothing inherent in the unlimited plan that would change that. Server can't read hosting plans. They don't respond to the bullet points on a hosts homepage plan box.
Unlimited is a scam, mismarketing and misinformationLast edited by Collabora; 08-22-2012 at 12:40 PM.
-
08-22-2012, 12:31 PM #11
-
08-22-2012, 12:39 PM #12Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Pflugerville, TX
- Posts
- 11,231
I have always advocated allowing hosts to advertise unlimited anytime, so long as they disclose every limiting factor used to determine whether a client's account will remain active, in the same ad.
The other side of this is hosts who have artificially high limits to bypass rules.
The answer is that all hosts must publish their limits within their advertisements. You do this, and as far as I'm concerned, you can offer 200% upgrades on your "unlimited" drives
If a customer comes to WHT and complains that he or she was kicked off a host for overusing resources, and we see that the host did not disclose those factors in their advertisements on WHT, they lose ad privileges. Simple as that.
This is good, because even hosts who do not oversell space/transfer must limit resource usage to prevent getting overrun by bad scripts. This should be openly discussed and required in all ads. This way, everyone gets to create the hosting plans/environments they want with no restrictions, everyone is forced to be open and honest, and more dialog can take place related to hosting resources that will be educational for visitors.
I see no downside to this, except that hosts will need to spend a little more time creating their advertisements.
-
08-22-2012, 12:41 PM #13Disabled
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Dub,Lon,Dal,Chi,NY,LA
- Posts
- 1,839
Perhaps the term used should be 'unmetered' with certain limitations.
-
08-22-2012, 01:17 PM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Location
- localhost
- Posts
- 3,771
With regards to unlimited bandwidth, it just shouldnt be mentioned, it should be governed by fair-use if no explicit limited, kinda like Heroku etc.., being explicit about unlimited can open a whole can of words, that said that isnt the point of this thread.
Ultimately, I dont think WHT should police these offers just as much as they shouldnt police hosts with "unlimited websites", or "unlimited emails" etc reseller accounts or the other crap we have now with master/alpha etc... Just like 99.999% dont enforce a limit on IOPS, on clock cycles per request, or incoming emails per hour, perhaps because their on the platform that cant handle isolation and resource accounting but still the fact remains. What about "unlimited subdomains" I can pretty sure I can starve that out? (any cpanel host want to take challenge then PM me). I see far greater points of contention with sine hosts than other hosts that dont explicitly limit bandwidth or space that parade around WHT flashing their gear (i mean sigs)Last edited by MattF; 08-22-2012 at 01:22 PM.
-
08-22-2012, 01:18 PM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
-
08-22-2012, 01:22 PM #16Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Indore, India
- Posts
- 1,723
-
08-22-2012, 01:23 PM #17The VPS Specialist
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Edinburgh/London
- Posts
- 5,789
Then you'll just get the usual idiots shouting "who read's the TOS/AuP these days?!"
-
08-22-2012, 01:34 PM #18Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Pflugerville, TX
- Posts
- 11,231
All hosts, even dishonest ones, will put this information in their TOS. This is how you keep out of legal trouble.
This is not good enough. Forcing people to dig through pages of legal documentation in order to obtain basic information about how the service they purchase operates is not acceptable.
At the very least, if we're going to stop policing offers (which I support), hosts should have to include a line in their ads saying what items factor into limiting accounts, and provide a link to the specific section of information that states it.
This, in my mind, would be a minimal requirement:
Originally Posted by future ads
Basic Plan:
- blah
- blah
- blah
- iNodes - 30,000
- CPU time - 10 min/mo.
- etc.
You get the idea. This is responsible advertising. It opens up new areas for discussion that should be addressed, bringing important factors into view that should be in plain site for the sake of general education. It allows people to compare apples to apples and really get a sense for which hosts will meet their needs. And most important, it provides the right environment to allow "unlimited" or "unmetered" (more accurate) selling on WHT.
I predict 50% of the limited hosts on WHT will switch to Unlimited/Unmetered if we allow this, and I don't mind that one bit, so long as it's done responsibly.
-
08-22-2012, 01:37 PM #19Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 177
Honesty is the best innovation of all
-
08-22-2012, 01:40 PM #20Disabled
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Dub,Lon,Dal,Chi,NY,LA
- Posts
- 1,839
-
08-22-2012, 01:54 PM #21
There's probably quite a few hosts that switched from unlimited to advertise here, so I'm sure you are right. I agree about limitations being more straight forward, but if you are offering unlimited you really can't apeal to the market that wants to be informed and browses WHT at this point because of all of the Unlmited hate here.
-
08-22-2012, 02:15 PM #22Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Pflugerville, TX
- Posts
- 11,231
At least at that point it's a community discussion and the "policing" it being done through education and debate between members, not moderators.
There are plenty of people who hate "unlimited" and there are plenty of people who support "unlimited," but who understand there's a big difference between unlimited disk/transfer and other resources. I agree with Terry - the current WHT position stifles this debate by taking a side on the issue before someone has even made their first post. Obviously the debate is still there, but it's almost moot on WHT.
We are interfering with thought leadership by not looking for ways to rethink how hosting works in a responsible manner.
-
08-22-2012, 02:23 PM #23
"Unlimited" is just that. If you offer me unlimited bandwidth then I'd better be able to push an infinite amount of bits per second down that pipe. a 1Gbit, 10Gbit or 100Gbit connection is not unlimited.
If you offer unlimited hard drive space and then cut me off when I use 5TB, then why not just say "this plan comes with 5TB of space"? Why mislead the customer or tell them you provide something you clearly don't.
I have never heard a good agrument for "unlimited" service simply because at the end of the day it doesn't exist.
The ONLY reason I have EVER been given that even makes sense to me is that you're trying to lure in unsophisticated customers that don't know any better.
-
08-22-2012, 02:27 PM #24
I'll just follow up quick:
If you want to say something like "Unlimited transfer on your 1Gbit connection", while the term unmetered is technically more accurate I can see something like that. Kind of like the cell phone "unlimited" talk time when there's only 720 hours in a month.
but there has to be a clearly stated limit, like "Unlimited disk space on your 40GB allotment" which sounds stupid but that's as far as I could ever see going.
-
08-22-2012, 02:28 PM #25
I've seen many good arguements made for unlimited hosting, how good an argument is is opinion. If it says you get an unlimited 100Mb/s shared connection what does that mean? That means they are not imposing any limits on that connection. It's a free for all on that line. I still hate when people use bandwidth for transfer. It's not bandwidth they are capping (though some hosts do) it's the transfer.
If a hard drive is unlimited, it means it's a free for all on that drive. The balance is the fine art of the administrator.
Or, put a fair use clause on the drive.
Similar Threads
-
CentOS after some time completely stop resolving some hostnames
By bratao in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 3Last Post: 10-09-2008, 01:38 PM -
Stop Right There! Fully Managed Servers! $10 Life-Time Reduction! LIMITED TIME ONLY!
By WolvTheHero in forum Dedicated Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 01-28-2008, 12:26 PM -
OK. It is time to stop and think about ordering
By Ganah ALLAN in forum Design OffersReplies: 5Last Post: 01-03-2006, 12:28 PM -
how to stop/change time for cron.daily
By WCHost in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 5Last Post: 11-06-2004, 10:06 AM