
05-01-2012, 10:39 AM
|
|
Premium Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Athens-Greece
Posts: 63
|
|
i7-2600 vs E3-1275 vs i7-3930K
Hello,
I have a question for a web server, Which ones is better for shared hosting services?
Server 1
Intel i7-2600 Quad-Core
32 GB DDR 3 RAM
2 x 3 TB SATA 6 Gb/s HDD; 7200 rpm (Software-RAID 1)
Server 2
Xeon E3-1275 Quad-Core
16 GB DDR 3 RAM ECC
2 x 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility 3 (Software-RAID 1)
Server 3
Intel i7-3930K Hexa-Core
64 GB DDR 3 RAM
2 x 3 TB SATA 6 Gb/s HDD; 7200 rpm (Software-RAID 1)
I want it for speed and reliability not for "Unmetered" Services
Thanks
|

05-01-2012, 10:48 AM
|
|
Randy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ashburn VA, San Diego CA
Posts: 3,946
|
|
Personally I would choose E3 series because you are guaranteed to have ECC memory, which is critical for data integrity in busy servers.
__________________
Fast Serv Networks, LLC | AS29889 | Dedicated, Cloud, Transit, Streaming and more...
Ashburn VA + San Diego CA
|

05-01-2012, 10:53 AM
|
|
Junior Guru
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 239
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Papadakis
Hello,
I have a question for a web server, Which ones is better for shared hosting services?
Server 1
Intel i7-2600 Quad-Core
32 GB DDR 3 RAM
2 x 3 TB SATA 6 Gb/s HDD; 7200 rpm (Software-RAID 1)
Server 2
Xeon E3-1275 Quad-Core
16 GB DDR 3 RAM ECC
2 x 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility 3 (Software-RAID 1)
Server 3
Intel i7-3930K Hexa-Core
64 GB DDR 3 RAM
2 x 3 TB SATA 6 Gb/s HDD; 7200 rpm (Software-RAID 1)
I want it for speed and reliability not for "Unmetered" Services
Thanks
|
I vote for server #2
|

05-01-2012, 10:59 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 497
|
|
I would rather server #2, as long as my combined data was under the 120GB amount. Otherwise I would increase the SSD size, but still stay with the rest of those specifications.
__________________
Rob@HIVELOCITY.NET
Award Winning Dedicated Servers
24/7 Impressive Technical Support- Huge Reseller Discounts
Best Dedicated Server Price Every Time- 1 click away
|

05-01-2012, 11:00 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Guru
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 302
|
|
Server #2, although I would be wary of only having 120 gigs of total storage space.. Still, if you're not concerned about that fact #2 should work out for you.
__________________
Ian Halliday
nDeviX Corporation
www.ndevix.com
Web Development | IT Consulting | Hosted Services | Mobile Apps
|

05-01-2012, 11:01 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 764
|
|
Your stated criteria is speed and reliability, so it has to be the Xeon with SSDs. You probably won't squeeze as many accounts into it as the others (depending on i/o load) but they are more likely to still be up in 12 months.
Have a look at hardware RAID options also, if your budget stretches, and also do some background digging on the OCZ drives - some SSDs have less than stellar reputations and I can't remember where the OCZ drives sit.
__________________
Advania Thor Data Centre Iceland - www.thordc.com
High Spec Colocation and Dedicated Servers, powered by cheap, abundant and 100% renewable energy.
Enterprise grade hosting, ISO27001 accredited for security, and all at fantastic pricing.
brian.rae@thordc.com
|

05-01-2012, 11:59 AM
|
|
WHT Addict
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 124
|
|
Server 2 gets my vote but the storage is not enough for shared hosting unless your doing 100mb packages
__________________
█ JonaHost.com | Premium Personal & Business Web Hosting
█ Softaculous | CloudFlare | CPanel Control Panel
█ Dedicated Servers | VPS Hosting | Domain Registration
█ 30 Days Money back | 24hrs Priority Support | Instant Setup
|

05-01-2012, 11:59 AM
|
|
Junior Guru
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 204
|
|
Server #2 except for the fact that you would probably want to save a few dollars and get the E3-1270 which does not have a GPU and instead use a server board with IPMI 2.0/ KVM-over-IP.
On the SSD side, they are pretty decent, but you need to be on stable firmware. Bad OCZ firmware is no good.
On the i7-3930K, you also want to look at which revision it is. The early versions did no support VT-d (if that is important for you.)
|

05-01-2012, 12:05 PM
|
|
Temporarily Suspended
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,156
|
|
If speed an reliability is the main factor, go with the E3 (#2) hands down. ECC ram will be used which from many years of first hand experienced, makes a world of a difference when running servers coupled with SSD drives, you cant go wrong. 16GB ram for the most part is plenty too.
|

05-01-2012, 04:02 PM
|
|
Premium Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Athens-Greece
Posts: 63
|
|
Thank you all!
So the final setup is :
1x Xeon E3-1275 for web server
1x Xeon E3-1275 for mysql server
1x Xeon E3-1275 for dns server
1x Intel i7-2600 for data backup
i will buy the r1soft for data backup, is there any better option?
|
Related posts from TheWhir.com
|
| Title |
Type |
Date Posted |
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|