Results 1 to 20 of 20
Thread: OnApp CDN Feedback
-
04-19-2012, 05:50 PM #1Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Raleigh, NC
- Posts
- 714
OnApp CDN Feedback
Hi all,
We've setup an OnApp CDN node and are testing it out.
Just wondering if others have put much traffic on their own nodes and/or the global federation, and what kind of results you are seeing with performance.
One thing I'm really curious about is how good the detection is to route users to the geographically closest node.
I'm just starting testing and will post results in the next few days.
-
04-19-2012, 07:32 PM #2Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- Miami, FL
- Posts
- 501
We've been using the Federation for a few months and I have to say I haven't heard of any complaints from our customers. We use it to host our main sites static content and from our various tests from different geographic locations the route detection has been spot on.
-
04-19-2012, 09:53 PM #3
I've been waiting to see some reviews of the OnAPP CDN since they released it, sadly there isn't a ton of info out there yet. Looking forward to seeing how it goes for you.
Keep us updated.
/subscribed[ IncogNET LLC ] Privacy By Design [Liberty Lake, WA][Kansas City, MO][Allentown, PA][Naaldwijk, NL]
[ Web Hosting | KVM VPS | Dedicated Servers | Domain Names | VPN | Censorship Resistance ]
Services provided in the United States and Netherlands with privacy and freedom of speech being our top priority.
-
04-19-2012, 10:36 PM #4WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Earth
- Posts
- 161
-
04-20-2012, 02:33 AM #5Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Posts
- 4,980
-
04-20-2012, 11:03 AM #6Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 361
-
04-20-2012, 11:14 AM #7WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Earth
- Posts
- 161
-
04-20-2012, 05:29 PM #8Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 30
Huh? How are they different or targeting different markets? Because they handle DNS/Anycast differently? Fewer edge locations? They're still targeting the same market aren't they? I was looking at OnApp as an easy way to setup a CDN service and start offering CDN to our clients... an alternative to some of the higher priced stuff out there. Is this not the case?
-
04-20-2012, 09:48 PM #9Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Posts
- 4,980
HTTP caching is definitely fine, just that certain features are tailored towards high end customers that aren't so much required by mass market. Segmenting customer group would basically help us to be focused in building functionalities that are tailored to mass market.
In terms of PoPs, we've in excess of 65 PoPs worldwide, so we are pretty distributed, and in fact it's our strength.
-
04-21-2012, 11:23 AM #10Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 361
Apart from Akamai, i dont think there are any CDN that has more PoPs.
( They properly have more servers and capacity, but not locations )
So apart from Software, it does stand a good chance to beat out others.
-
04-22-2012, 05:15 AM #11Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 361
I spoke too soon, indeed the Latency really needs some working on.
-
04-22-2012, 05:33 AM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Posts
- 4,980
Mind elaborating it? Drop me a mail on that at whei.wong@onapp.com, will look into it.
-
04-22-2012, 10:56 PM #13WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Earth
- Posts
- 161
-
04-23-2012, 04:27 AM #14Workaholic
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 1,241
-
04-24-2012, 02:59 AM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 633
One of my questions about these federated CDNs is how is performance guaranteed and what are the SLAs, if any? I don't know much about MaxCDN, but I do know CloudFront offers an SLA (though it's not great in comparison to the pure play CDN vendors). I suppose you could use a multi CDN strategy with a cheap, federated CDN and then a backup, more expensive traditional CDN to fill in any performance gaps, and use something like Dyn's CDN Manager or 3Crowd's CrowdDirector to manage it, but that's a layer of complexity (and cost) that's probably only warranted for larger customers.
Edit: It looks like 3Crowd now has a federated CDN offering very similar to OnApp CDN, called XDN. I do know of another company, Jet-Stream, that has a federated CDN product, but it seems more popular in Europe and is being targeted at telcos, not hosting companies. Looks like this segment is heating up--it will be interesting to see how much, if any, pricing pressure these offerings will put on traditional CDN operators.Last edited by lockbull; 04-24-2012 at 03:03 AM. Reason: Additional info
-
04-25-2012, 01:39 PM #16Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Raleigh, NC
- Posts
- 714
Here are my thoughts from testing out OnApp CDN so far:
There are certainly no strict SLAs with it. But, they do enforce specific hardware requirements in order for an Edge Server to be accepted into the global federation.
The dashboard mentions they do passive monitoring of the edge server every 10 seconds, and active monitoring every 60 seconds. So, hopefully an edge server failure is detected quickly and automatically taken out of service.
Other notes from testing:
Terminology and documentation has a lot of room for improvement. For example, they use the word "publisher" in the global dashboard to describe something called an "edge resource" in another place.
Setup was a little bit tricky. I followed the documentation, but had to get OnApp support to fix two things that I couldn't figure out from the docs. (#1 - cdn edge node template was not installed and #2 - my custom domain somehow just "didnt work")
The backbone of a CDN is the DNS infrastructure. So, to use the OnApp CDN you have to trust and use their DNS. I've done some testing on their anycast dns network and it works OK. Performance is not as good as DNSMadeEasy but they did take traceroutes from me in order to attempt improvement. However, during testing I noticed that one of their authoritative DNS servers was broken (not answering any dns queries) which was concerning. That was fixed within a few hours of reporting the problem.
Interfaces are still a little bit clunky since they are merging Aflexi stuff in with new stuff they are developing. For example, if you want to subscribe to another CDN node in the federation it takes 3 steps in 2 different systems: 1) subscribe in the global dashboard 2) edit your cdn edge group to include it and 3) edit and re-save your CDN "site" (a.k.a. CDN Resource). the 3rd step was not intuitive and I had to contact support to figure that out.
When you create a new CDN Resource, it takes "15-20 minutes" until it will work, according to support ticket 388327. This is not documented and counter to the "Status: Active" that the control panel shows you.
As a provider, you can't deploy edge servers in multiple geographic locations unless you also have a OnApp cloud deployed there. I wanted to add a edge server in another location, but that would require 2 physical boxes and $140/mo in OnApp fees. They said that is something they want to allow but not in the next few months.
Routing requests from clients to the Edge Servers works pretty well but I need to do more testing. It seems that the request will pretty much always go to an edge server in the same *country* however in the US, my requests do not go to the geographically closest edge server. It would be nice if they had documentation about how their request routing worked.
Interested in hearing what other providers think of it ...Last edited by TQ Mark; 04-25-2012 at 01:42 PM. Reason: clarification
-
04-25-2012, 08:39 PM #17Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Posts
- 4,980
-
04-26-2012, 01:06 AM #18Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Posts
- 4,980
Terminology and documentation has a lot of room for improvement. For example, they use the word "publisher" in the global dashboard to describe something called an "edge resource" in another place.
Setup was a little bit tricky. I followed the documentation, but had to get OnApp support to fix two things that I couldn't figure out from the docs. (#1 - cdn edge node template was not installed and #2 - my custom domain somehow just "didnt work")
As for custom domain, is this fixed? Do you have a ticket? Need to check on that. I suspect it could be some capitalized letter in the domain and our strict checking system rejected it because we only support lowercase, but this is now improved.
The backbone of a CDN is the DNS infrastructure. So, to use the OnApp CDN you have to trust and use their DNS. I've done some testing on their anycast dns network and it works OK. Performance is not as good as DNSMadeEasy but they did take traceroutes from me in order to attempt improvement. However, during testing I noticed that one of their authoritative DNS servers was broken (not answering any dns queries) which was concerning. That was fixed within a few hours of reporting the problem.
Interfaces are still a little bit clunky since they are merging Aflexi stuff in with new stuff they are developing. For example, if you want to subscribe to another CDN node in the federation it takes 3 steps in 2 different systems: 1) subscribe in the global dashboard 2) edit your cdn edge group to include it and 3) edit and re-save your CDN "site" (a.k.a. CDN Resource). the 3rd step was not intuitive and I had to contact support to figure that out.
When you create a new CDN Resource, it takes "15-20 minutes" until it will work, according to support ticket 388327. This is not documented and counter to the "Status: Active" that the control panel shows you.
Routing requests from clients to the Edge Servers works pretty well but I need to do more testing. It seems that the request will pretty much always go to an edge server in the same *country* however in the US, my requests do not go to the geographically closest edge server. It would be nice if they had documentation about how their request routing worked.
I'm sorry with the teething problems you've encountered, and I assure you that we are working around the clock to improve the services. Nevertheless, I really appreciate the feedback that you've given, hopefully the next time you have any review, it's nothing short of spectacular experience with us
-
04-26-2012, 10:13 AM #19Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Raleigh, NC
- Posts
- 714
-
05-13-2012, 12:25 PM #20New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 4
When I ran Gomez against OnApp and compared them to Akamai, EdgeCast, LimeLight, Level3, XDN and MaxCDN I found that OnApp was in the middle, close to EdgeCast. I also did some a/b testing to try and get a feel for performance but I don't had a site big enough to prove anything.
If OnApp is not optimizing for Gomez, then the performance puts them up with the other major providers, ahead of MaxCDN but it's a unfair comparison since I did not have the APAC add-on from MaxCDN.
Similar Threads
-
[YISP] 10TB CDN traffic, world coverage and powered by Onapp! Now only $499
By Rens in forum Other Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 12-17-2011, 12:03 PM -
[YISP] 10TB CDN traffic, world coverage and powered by Onapp! Now only $499
By Rens in forum Other Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 12-14-2011, 10:52 AM -
OnApp CDN
By forumtalk in forum Specialty Hosting and MarketsReplies: 17Last Post: 11-14-2011, 08:09 AM -
OnApp launches CDN platform for hosting providers
By eming in forum Web Hosting Industry AnnouncementsReplies: 1Last Post: 08-08-2011, 06:43 PM -
SpeedySparrow - Powered by OnApp + CloudFlare CDN + 50% OFF + CloudLinux Performance!
By Sparrow-Sean in forum Reseller Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 06-22-2011, 03:28 AM