Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    In general you're narrowing down the list of available colo providers by specifying 1 or 2 servers.

    Trying to colocate 1U or 2U of space and obtaining internap bandwidth is going to take some rigorous searching, if you're expecting 50 to 100 dollars per U.

    Your odds of getting on pure internap bandwidth would increase dramatically if you just paid for more space (1/3rd or half rack) or paid more for the same amount of space.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Tampa, Fl
    Posts
    181
    Do you have to have Internap exclusively? Since you are using it for game servers and you probably are looking for the best routes/ping time, you might want to try steadfast.

    My ping to my server at steadfast chicago is ~3ms lower than to NFO's chicago server. its always been like this for me. I use to run a GSP and when I lived in WV just south of pittsburg using TW, Steadfast was still a couple of MS quicker.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Tampa, Fl
    Posts
    181
    This is my actual collocated server inside Steadfast:
    5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 31.746/33.223/34.890/1.240 ms
    new-host-5:arctic XX$ ping -c 5 eveXXX.com
    PING evenXX.com (50.31.2.XXX): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 50.31.2.XXX: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=56.150 ms
    64 bytes from 50.31.2.XXX: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=60.353 ms
    64 bytes from 50.31.2.XXX: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=59.948 ms
    64 bytes from 50.31.2.XXX: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=61.450 ms
    64 bytes from 50.31.2.XXX: icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=64.489 ms

    --- eveXXX.com ping statistics ---


    This is the CSource server from NFO listed on their website
    5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 56.150/60.478/64.489/2.686 ms
    new-host-5:arctic XXX$ ping -c 5 74.91.115.74
    PING 74.91.115.74 (74.91.115.74): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 74.91.115.74: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=63.126 ms
    64 bytes from 74.91.115.74: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=61.029 ms
    64 bytes from 74.91.115.74: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=65.212 ms
    64 bytes from 74.91.115.74: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=61.623 ms
    64 bytes from 74.91.115.74: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=62.853 ms

    Also my server is currently under a sizable load

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    86
    No this is not for game servers, we only do exclusive vps and dedicated deals. My team and I are ready to deploy 20-25 servers, we choose Internap for it's best latency while streaming videos, downloading/uploading content to their sites. Anyone know what the minimum commit for Internap is, how much they charge per one mbps.

    Andrew I cannot seem to PM you due to your post count.
    Last edited by ibnet; 04-07-2012 at 09:42 PM.

  5. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by ibnet View Post
    Andrew I cannot seem to PM you due to your post count.
    I guess this means I need to post more :-)
    Shoot me an email at aboring at internap dot com.

  6. Newsletters

    Subscribe Now & Get The WHT Quick Start Guide!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. internap or I/O Datacenters in Phoenix?
    By Northrock in forum Colocation and Data Centers
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-27-2011, 02:17 AM
  2. Cogent buys transit from InterNAP or InterNAP added cogent to the mix?
    By The Broadband Man in forum Dedicated Server
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 06-07-2005, 03:03 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-24-2004, 10:37 PM
  4. InterNap or Peak-10 Datacenters?
    By td323i in forum Web Hosting
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-24-2003, 08:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •