Results 1 to 18 of 18
-
08-22-2011, 12:32 PM #1Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 450
The Protect IP Act: Wrong for web hosting?
PROTECT IP ACT
Only kept from Senate floor by a single member’s procedural intervention, this act stipulates that:
- Hosts are “acting in concert” with customers who are violating other’s rights.
- There is no safe harbor:* even if you comply, you can still be sued.
- No court orders are required for hosts to be “technically feasible.”*
Here's the bill:
Protect IP: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1...-112s968rs.pdf
This bill may come to the Senate floor at any time. We NEED to be talking about it!Christian Dawson Exectuive Director and Co-Founder, i2Coalition
The i2Coalition is comprised of small to medium cloud providers, data centers, registrars, registries and other foundational Internet enterprises. Join today!
Follow us on Twitter @i2coalition or checkout our forum!
-
08-22-2011, 04:20 PM #2Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 407
Just to get it out of the way, I'm not a lawyer.
Having read the entire bill, I think you may have missed a definition.
the term "owner" or "operator" when used in connection with an Internet site shall include, respectively, any owner of a majority interest in, or any person with authority to operate, such Internet site (Page 33, lines 19 - 23)
If we move this to a residential scenario, would your home ISP be legally responsible if you were file sharing? Enough to be sued? I don't think so, but again, I'm not a lawyer...
-
08-22-2011, 04:22 PM #3Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- NY
- Posts
- 11,863
-
08-23-2011, 10:11 AM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 4
Hi Chris -
Glad that someone else is reading the fine print!
The definition you're analyzing refers to who may be sued initially by the Attorney General. One of the changes in PROTECT-IP vs. COICA (last year's version) is that internet infrastructure providers have been removed from the list of entities who may be sued by the Attorney General (in most cases).
The issue for hosts is that there doesn't appear to be a requirement of operational reasonableness required of court orders directing you to take action against the operators. Looking at the bill, advertisers and financial service providers have been called out a couple of times and limits placed on what courts can force them to do.
My experience has been that courts often make the analogy that hosts are similar to self storage vendors. As a result, their orders will require you to do something like "preserve all data on the server, while allowing it to remain online." In a managed hosting context, those two requirements are typically mutually exclusive.
There is also a concern that there is no immunity from liability for the actions of your customers. While this is a bit murkier than the prior issue, it seems that particular industries have been called out for protection, while others, hosting in particular have not. This ambiguity could lead to years of litigation.
My analysis of the bill is on my WHIR blog (I can't link to it because I don't have 5 posts yet).
David
-
08-23-2011, 10:20 AM #5Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 450
Here is a copy of the blog post David mentions:
http://www.thewhir.com/blog/David_Sn...ROTECT_IP_billChristian Dawson Exectuive Director and Co-Founder, i2Coalition
The i2Coalition is comprised of small to medium cloud providers, data centers, registrars, registries and other foundational Internet enterprises. Join today!
Follow us on Twitter @i2coalition or checkout our forum!
-
08-24-2011, 11:18 AM #6New Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 2
The infuriating thing here is that this legislation is so unnecessary. Do they really need additional tools to fight theft of IP? No matter what the penalties, people will infringe. I guess I might feel differently if I were a movie studio or record label. I also think preservation and equipment seizure requirements are particularly onerous with the prevalence of cloud for high end customers. It's like shared hosting but for big boys. :-) I hope it doesn't come down to the government seizing an entire cloud infrastructure for a single rogue client to help the government think their policies through, but it wouldn't surprise me either.
-
08-24-2011, 11:19 AM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Chicago IL
- Posts
- 573
Subscribing this post. Very interesting and something to stay advised on.
█ WebzPro.com Hosting Solutions Since 2004
█ Shared/Reseller Hosting - Semi-Dedicated
█ 24/7 Support Help Desk
█ - LiteSpeed Powered Servers CPanel/WHM
-
08-24-2011, 02:28 PM #8Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 450
I agree - the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is the current status quo. It is not without some issues, but they are issues that can be addressed if the right parties sit down to talk about solutions.. Overall it's a good piece of legislation - a pro-business, sensible way of approaching IP.
First of all I want to make it clear that I am extremely sympathetic to copyright holders. I think that by and large web hosts are on their side, and we stand against anybody who is illegally exploiting their works. But when it comes right down to it, there are right and wrong ways to do things, and Protect IP has got it wrong.
The biggest problem with the DMCA is that it tends to result in a game of whack-a-mole. A host works with authorities to shut down a site, but that doesn't stop it from popping up elsewhere, which it inevitably does. That is a problem, and it has led to great frustration on the part of copyright holders, understandably so. And parts of Protect IP endeavor to try to fix that problem. Protect IP actually may result in lists of domains that hosts will have strong incentives to blacklist. That could help the game of whack-a-mole. But how do they achieve it? By throwing out an incredible amount of due process.
I completely understand the government's desire to find a better way to protect copyright owners. One is needed. The DMCA, flawed as it is, should be the framework on which we build the next step in our campaign to provide relief to victims of copyright abuse. The DMCA can be improved upon a lot easier than Protect IP could be turned into something that won't do a lot more harm than it does good.Christian Dawson Exectuive Director and Co-Founder, i2Coalition
The i2Coalition is comprised of small to medium cloud providers, data centers, registrars, registries and other foundational Internet enterprises. Join today!
Follow us on Twitter @i2coalition or checkout our forum!
-
08-24-2011, 09:46 PM #9Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 4,076
Well, we started with one commandment: love God as you love yourself. Then it became 10...and then today, heh.
Seriously, though, it happens that some IP groups have the resources to lobby for protecting their interests.
What I find disturbing in this bill's current version is there's hardly any "reprieve" if the enforcing body turns out wrong. I mean, accountability goes both ways, doesn't it?Last edited by Dave_Z; 08-24-2011 at 09:50 PM.
-
08-28-2011, 10:21 AM #10Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 450
Lobbying resources are one thing, but Google has lobbying resources and it hardly ever gets it way legislatively. Why? Because it doesn't have numbers. We do. We're in a great position to enact legislative change because hoisters - backed by money or no - if educated and empowered - have numbers on our side.
Christian Dawson Exectuive Director and Co-Founder, i2Coalition
The i2Coalition is comprised of small to medium cloud providers, data centers, registrars, registries and other foundational Internet enterprises. Join today!
Follow us on Twitter @i2coalition or checkout our forum!
-
08-28-2011, 12:01 PM #11New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 4
The issue, honestly, with Google, Microsoft etc's lobbying efforts is that they're completely transparent. A very focused industry effort is often more successful than those from a large company, no mater its resources.
-
10-14-2011, 06:38 AM #12Newbie
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 10
Any new updates?
-
10-20-2011, 09:47 PM #13Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Dallas, Texas
- Posts
- 259
From what I understand this has tried multiple times to get pushed through but never gets enough votes. We need to be sure it stays that way!
Justin
-
10-29-2011, 12:15 AM #14Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 450
It's got the votes - Senator Ron Wyden is holding up the bill. It's one procedural vote from passage.
Here's a phenomenal video about exactly what's wrong with PIPA, and why it's so dangerous:
http://fightforthefuture.org/pipa/Christian Dawson Exectuive Director and Co-Founder, i2Coalition
The i2Coalition is comprised of small to medium cloud providers, data centers, registrars, registries and other foundational Internet enterprises. Join today!
Follow us on Twitter @i2coalition or checkout our forum!
-
12-30-2011, 04:08 PM #15Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 61
Lots of great information in here, thanks.
-
01-11-2012, 08:32 PM #16Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Montreal
- Posts
- 36
Subscribing this post for sure! Very interesting.
-
01-16-2012, 05:49 PM #17WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Austin, TX
- Posts
- 112
Very true. The heart of the problem is that all the major arguments for SOPA/PIPA are based on bs figures. Here's a good post from the Cato Institute debunking the bs numbers that are being provided to Congress / Staffers about the impacts of piracy on the web:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/how-c...-con-congress/-Dave Koston
Koston Consulting
-
01-20-2012, 03:51 PM #18Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Posts
- 450
BIG news on SOPA & PIPA today - go here for full details:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1118805Christian Dawson Exectuive Director and Co-Founder, i2Coalition
The i2Coalition is comprised of small to medium cloud providers, data centers, registrars, registries and other foundational Internet enterprises. Join today!
Follow us on Twitter @i2coalition or checkout our forum!
Similar Threads
-
BlazeForce Web Hosting - MySQL Experts - Domain Registration | 25 % Off Act Now!
By jaytee0902 in forum Shared Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 07-08-2011, 11:33 AM -
BlazeForce Web Hosting - MySQL - cPanel - 25 % Off - Act Now!
By jaytee0902 in forum Shared Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 04-22-2011, 02:24 PM -
Get 89% Off All Shared Web Hosting Plans!! Act Fast , Offer Will Not Last Long
By SupportRep911 in forum Shared Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 05-22-2008, 04:34 AM -
ACT NOW. Get 1 Year Free Web Hosting - SuperbHosting.net
By Superb in forum Shared Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 08-03-2007, 04:40 PM