Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread: SAN: FCoE or iSCSI
-
06-09-2011, 12:01 AM #1Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 190
SAN: FCoE or iSCSI
Hi,
currently we have VMware and some "old" SANs with Brocade fibre channel switches running. Now we have to upgrade our storage system.
Well, nowadays we have 10Gbit/s ethernet, so letīs take "normal" 10Gbit/s layer 2 switches with ISCSI I thought.
Our HP seller guy really doesnīt want us to take ISCSI. He offered us a EVA P6300 package with fibre channel over ethernet (FCOE) only and Brocade 8/40 for of course "much better performance". But what about ISCSI, "do you offer also ISCSI based solutions?" Of couse, he "forgot" to mention that thereīs also a mixed controller setup with 4x FCOE and 4x 10Gbit/s (for ISCSI) ports. But nah, as "ISCSI is new", "nah", "donīt take that"...
And of couse, it is needless to say that a fully equipped Brocaded 8/40 with lincensed ports and support contract is a really pricy thing. And of course we need two for redundancy purpose...
So, here I am. The question is: ISCSI or fibre channel over ethernet?
(Btw, that "over ethernet" within FCoE. Is there a reason, why I couldnīt take a "normal" layer 2 ethernet switch for this, too? It seems ISCSI changes the ethernet header a little and thatīs the reason?
As I said it will be for VMware (running AD, storage, Exchange, no additional databases).
Another thing I wondered about. He offered us a HP storage solution with 2.5" harddrives with 10000rpm.
Why shouldnīt take 3.5" 7200rpm based harddrives instead?
The HP guy talked about better I/O performance. But hay, do I really need that in my case?
-
06-09-2011, 04:21 AM #2Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 1,143
FCoE is still a pretty new thing, but it does seem to be winning ground. Making use of existing ethernet equipment is really cheap - But the FCoE adapters prolly arent?
ISCSI is decent, no doubt.. Thats how I would go right now, insted of being your sales dudes testsubject
That being said, maybe someone inhere got experience with FCoE and got a good experience with it
-
06-09-2011, 06:56 AM #3WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 120
We have used FC, FCoE and iscsi and if I was planning a new install today I would definitely go with 10Gb iscsi. It's blazing fast with wide industry support. Fibre channel is of course a quality system, but the additional cost is simply not reflected in better performance these days.
██ Enterprise Class Cloud Hosting And Disaster Recovery. SAN Replication.
██ VMware Hosting on HP Blades With NetApp or EqualLogic SAN Storage. 100% Guaranteed Uptime.
██ Build Your Own Virtual DataCentre In The Cloud. Fully Integrated With vCenter.
██ StratoGen Are An Authorised VMware Partner | StratoGen.net
-
06-09-2011, 11:47 AM #4Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Tucson AZ
- Posts
- 367
SPEAKservers, LLC - Premium Hosting Solutions
Dedicated & Virtual Servers - Colocation - Transport/DIA - VoIP
sales@speakservers.com / scott@speakservers.com
-
06-09-2011, 12:32 PM #5Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 351
We went 10gb iscsi using brocade ti-24x-ac and got 2 each for 2 locations, 4 total, we were able to get a good deal through mike at myriad supply. Though its not in production yet we have been happy with the performance so far. The 24x-ac have a limited lifetime replacement warranty and the config is very similar to cisco, so we didnt feel the need to get the support contract on it.
As for sans, we looked at hp, stonefly, dell, and netapp and ended up going with stonefly with a mix of sas and sata drives.
-
06-09-2011, 12:38 PM #6Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Posts
- 5,105
We looked at it and went with iscsi. Broader support, performance is excellent and allows you to have consistent infrastructure.
-
06-09-2011, 01:24 PM #7
FCoE is pointless. See http://www.google.com/#q=FCoE+packetpushers
fiber channel is a lossless protocol, you absolutely must not lose packets for it to work. Does that sound like a good match with ethernet? I don't think so either.IOFLOOD.com -- We Love Servers
Phoenix, AZ Dedicated Servers in under an hour
★ Ryzen 9: 7950x3D ★ Dual E5-2680v4 Xeon ★
Contact Us: sales@ioflood.com ★
-
06-09-2011, 03:10 PM #8Newbie
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 17
iSCSI.
You are talking to a salesperson, or whatever they call it... sales engineer - who w/ some technical background. Regardless, they are going upsale you no matter what.
-
06-09-2011, 03:59 PM #9THE Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 6,957
FCoE is fine but iSCSI is too new? iSCSI has been widely deployed for 5+ years and FCoE wasn't standardized until 2010 with the first devices hitting the market in 2008. iSCSI is a much more mature platform than FCoE so that seems like an odd reason.
If HP doesn't like iSCSI on their products, I'd suggest going with a different provider altogether then. NetApp is more than happy to do iSCSI.
And yes, the 10k RPM 2.5" drives will offer a lot better IO performance than 3.5" 7200RPM drives, but you'll get even better performance with 3.5" 15k RPM drives and probably pay less per GB than the 2.5" drives.Karl Zimmerman - Founder & CEO of Steadfast
VMware Virtual Data Center Platform
karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
-
06-09-2011, 04:16 PM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 697
IMHO (coming from a 3000+ port SAN) iSCSI is a joke and FCoE is quite pointless, two old 4gig HBAs FC will stomp both solutions in probably performance and definitely in reliability, as being quasi-lossless.
I can't judge on your setup but I don't normally see much incentive for upgrading. FCoE will play nicer with FC but relies more heavily on datacenter ethernet which is not-so-proven and iSCSI is proven by now but not really good for anything, i.e. with VMWare ESXi you might see some problems with active/active arrays when using iSCSI.
FCoE is in fact the new kid on the block and has little adoption. I'd go with FCoE if I had something well-integrated like Cisco UCS, otherwise I'd rather stay away.
What I'd do if I had enough money for shopping is to bring in someone from HDS for some offer based on a good sized AMS.Check out my SSD guides for Samsung, HGST (Hitachi Global Storage) and Intel!
-
06-09-2011, 04:34 PM #11IOFLOOD.com -- We Love Servers
Phoenix, AZ Dedicated Servers in under an hour
★ Ryzen 9: 7950x3D ★ Dual E5-2680v4 Xeon ★
Contact Us: sales@ioflood.com ★
-
06-09-2011, 04:43 PM #12Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 509
-
06-09-2011, 05:09 PM #13IOFLOOD.com -- We Love Servers
Phoenix, AZ Dedicated Servers in under an hour
★ Ryzen 9: 7950x3D ★ Dual E5-2680v4 Xeon ★
Contact Us: sales@ioflood.com ★
-
06-09-2011, 08:15 PM #14Backup Guru
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 4,618
Another option for the DIY-type people would be Infiniband with SRP. You won't find a lot of pre-made solutions for it, but that might change in the future. 40Gbps Infiniband is around the same price as 10Gbps Ethernet, and configuring an SRP target is very similar to configuring an iSCSI target.
Last edited by bqinternet; 06-09-2011 at 08:20 PM.
Scott Burns, President
BQ Internet Corporation
Remote Rsync and FTP backup solutions
*** http://www.bqbackup.com/ ***
-
06-10-2011, 12:37 PM #15THE Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 6,957
What makes iSCSI a joke? We have it running on a couple configs with 10 GigE backends and it is working out great. It works well for distributing across our existing ethernet network, distributing it to multiple clients, etc. It certainly has it's uses in an existing ethernet environment. I also find it hard to believe you're getting better performance with 4Gbit/sec FC, unless you're just doing it wrong...
And Scott, yeah, Infiniband keeps looking like a better option, that is what we've been looking at for our next cloud deployment.Karl Zimmerman - Founder & CEO of Steadfast
VMware Virtual Data Center Platform
karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
-
06-11-2011, 03:55 PM #16Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 190
Hi,
thank you for all your answers. Well, to make it short, it will be iSCSI, too. Btw, what 10Gbit/s switches do you use with it?
Similar Threads
-
SAN iSCSI performance question
By latitude in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 4Last Post: 02-07-2010, 10:22 AM -
What is iSCSI SAN Storage ?
By hsbsitez in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 3Last Post: 07-27-2009, 10:06 AM -
EqualLogic PS5000 iSCSI SAN
By BruceDonado in forum Colocation, Data Centers, IP Space and NetworksReplies: 4Last Post: 03-24-2008, 04:45 PM -
Low cost ISCSI SAN
By WebGuyz in forum Colocation, Data Centers, IP Space and NetworksReplies: 29Last Post: 07-31-2007, 03:46 PM -
iSCSI SAN vs. GigE Switch
By wagich in forum Colocation, Data Centers, IP Space and NetworksReplies: 18Last Post: 01-03-2006, 06:58 PM