Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011

    Chicago vs. Dallas connectivity ?

    There seems to be some side bar comments that keep popping up on which is better. I am often wrong and did not want to go off topic on those who think Dallas is generally better in the 4 posts that this came up in recently. I want to understand better the points that make Dallas look better. This is why I say Chicago: If you go to and look at the exchange points in both cities, Chicago appears far superior..I know this is not 100% accurate and certainly does not include all networks but there is a trend with enough discrepancy between the two cities that would say that unless you are focusing on Latin America, Chicago is a better choice than Dallas. That is the only thing I am going by. I would like to know what I am missing in my thinking, if anything..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    My concern with Dallas is proximity to the Gulf of Mexico. At 250 miles inland they're not as vulnerable as Houston to tropical weather, but anyone who's lived in a hurricane zone knows how far inland a decent sized storm can travel. My other concern is tornados, given its proximity to tornado alley.

    My concern with Chicago is (potentially) greater exposure to terrorist activity because it's a major banking and financial center. A lot of datacenters and carrier POPs are in the same buildings as the major financial exchanges. I personally would never colo in NYC for the same reason.

    Connectivity-wise, I would put DFW and Chicago on somewhat equal footing. Dallas has better reach to the sun belt where a good chunk of the country's population lives. Chicago would be preferable if you want to reach the Northeast.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    both cities have alot of connectivity people that think dallas has more i dont understand them but everyone is entitled to their own opinion

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Chicago, IL
    Both cities are about the same distance from the population center of the US, both good central locations. Chicago has more sheer throughput, peering, and connectivity, and that is largely driven by the financial markets. if you're a high frequency trader, you wouldn't even consider Dallas over CHicago, but Dallas is certainly good enough for anyone in the WHT crowd.
    Karl Zimmerman - Steadfast: Managed Dedicated Servers and Premium Colocation
    karl @ - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
    Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
    Now Open in New Jersey! - Contact us for New Jersey colocation or dedicated servers

Similar Threads

  1. Chicago and Dallas Providers
    By JDrago1926 in forum Dedicated Server
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-20-2011, 03:26 AM
  2. Chicago or Dallas, and why?
    By jabcott in forum Dedicated Server
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-04-2009, 11:30 PM
  3. Dallas Vs. Chicago
    By esense in forum Colocation and Data Centers
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-05-2009, 05:16 PM
  4. Dallas and Chicago Host
    By The Broadband Man in forum Dedicated Server
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-25-2004, 01:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts