Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Orlando, FL

    RAID 6 - Server, SAN, or Virtual

    Is anyone using RAID 6 for your servers, SAN, or virtual hosts? I have heard RAID 6 kind of sucks, but have no actual experience with it. I know there aren't any dedicated providers out there setting up RAID 6, so I figured it would be us colo guys if anyone using it. Anyone care to share their thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    hi, if i may give it a try:

    raid5 and raid6 are essentially the same in performance terms.
    usually the! absolutely! worst! choice! for databases.
    will be fastest from 6-12 spindles (except in hitachi ams which are heavily tuned for it)
    will be a bit better the larger your write cache is.
    will be very much worse if the filesystem (or vm data) is not well aligned on the stripes.

    for something more practical - at our my old job we had a few shelfs of raid5 for infrequently used VMs and raid10 for anything else. raid5 was really not great fun, and that was with 3.5GB of write cache.
    it might still be ok... if you got a powerful controller it will give you constant performance despite higher latencies. especially if the load won't be insanely high, it might be all OK!

    raid6 is interesting because it covers you from double disk failures during a rebuild.
    if you have large disks you'll have the problem that a rebuild will take 10+ hours at times and that is a long time of praying to the storage gods.

    hope that helped a little.
    Check out my SSD guides for Samsung, HGST (Hitachi Global Storage) and Intel!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    New York, NY
    As with anything, it depends what you're doing with it.

    RAID6 is basically an improvement on RAID5. It can handle two disk failures. With a good controller, it's great for mass storage. We use 16-drive RAID6 arrays on Adaptec 5805Z cards. It has no problems doing 2000+ IOPS of fairly random writes. If we wanted to saturate the sustained bandwidth that it's capable of, we'd need to upgrade the NICs from GigE to 10GigE.

    For anything performance-sensitive, such as VMs or databases, I would use RAID10. For mass storage, RAID6 is a good choice.
    Scott Burns, President
    BQ Internet Corporation
    Remote Rsync and FTP backup solutions
    *** ***

  4. #4
    For last 6 years we are using RAID6 and all our core data sits on these units. With (the latest) 2 TB drives you don't want anything to happen to data while the 2 TB drive rebuilds.

    We are very happy with it (RAID6 units) and definitely recommend to anybody who needs reliable drive storage. Specifically we are using RAIDWEB units, I think about 6 units of them 16 drives each.
    Professional Streaming services - - info at
    Double optimized - AS36820) network, best for live streaming/VoIP/gaming
    The best quality network - AS7219

Similar Threads

  1. SAN RAID Groups - Best Choice when setting them up
    By marsupillami in forum Colocation and Data Centers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-29-2010, 03:49 AM
  2. 8GB RAM and 146 GB FC SAN Raid 1 Space - $1,000
    By wgwilkins in forum VPS Hosting Offers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-05-2009, 12:03 AM
  3. Anyone serve hosting off a SAN / NAS / Raid Array?
    By rracer99 in forum Hosting Security and Technology
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-08-2003, 10:52 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-27-2003, 07:52 PM
  5. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-19-2003, 05:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts