
03-22-2011, 10:44 AM
|
|
Global Solutions Provider
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,150
|
|
I think it's much more fantastic than Version 3. Your thoughts? I use FasterFox with it to boost the speed of it too. 
__________________
█ http://rlshosting.com
█ RLS Hosting | Real, Logical, & Solid.
█ Web Hosting, Master Resellers, Dedicated Servers, & Domain Registration.
█ RVSkins, RVSiteBuilder Professional, & Softaculous Premium Auto Installer
|

03-22-2011, 10:51 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 485
|
|
This is a great improvement. I might just switch back to Firefox from Chrome now. 
__________________
JSHosts - UK Web Hosting
Web Hosting | Reseller Hosting | OpenVZ VPS | Xen VPS
cPanel | Softaculous | CloudLinux | CloudFlare | R1Soft Backups
|

03-22-2011, 10:52 AM
|
|
"I'm bi-winning" - Charlie
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,863
|
|
What are the new features compared to V3?
__________________
█ NetDepot.com | Atlanta & Dallas Data Centers - Highly secure & stable SSAE 16 Type II Certified
█ Dedicated Servers | VMware Based Cloud Services | Enterprise VMware Solutions | Colocation – Since 1994
█ Terrence Yhap | General Manager | tyhap[@]gnax.net | 404.230.9150 x227 | www.NetDepot.com
█ Reseller Discounts Available
|

03-22-2011, 11:14 AM
|
|
WHT Addict
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 124
|
|
|

03-22-2011, 12:13 PM
|
|
Temporarily Suspended
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 127
|
|
FF4 looks fantastic. Firefox has always been my favorite browser.
|

03-22-2011, 12:21 PM
|
|
Junior Guru Wannabe
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
|
|
I think this release is just plain bad.
The menu bar is exactly the same as Opera 10 has been using since it's release. Why need to copy something from other browsers?
And I just can't get used to browsers without bottom tabs and since it's gone with FF4, it looks like a "slower" version of Chrome when browsing a few websites.
I guess I'll stick to Opera.
|

03-22-2011, 12:24 PM
|
|
Global Solutions Provider
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,150
|
|
I guess it doesn't need Fasterfox. It seems quite fast without it.
__________________
█ http://rlshosting.com
█ RLS Hosting | Real, Logical, & Solid.
█ Web Hosting, Master Resellers, Dedicated Servers, & Domain Registration.
█ RVSkins, RVSiteBuilder Professional, & Softaculous Premium Auto Installer
|

03-22-2011, 12:35 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 532
|
|
Chrome has and does everything I need. I tried the beta of FF4 and wasn't to thrilled. I don't know what could move me from Chrome.
|

03-22-2011, 12:51 PM
|
|
Aspiring Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 437
|
|
Just downloaded it. Looks Awesome!  Hope it is indeed 6 x faster.
__________________
WebbyCart.com - Pushing Onwards
Server Management | Outsourced Hosting Support | Remote / Offsite Rsync Backup | Fully Managed Servers & Cloud VPS
sales@webbycart.com
|

03-22-2011, 12:52 PM
|
|
Community Liaison
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,645
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speckl
Chrome has and does everything I need. I tried the beta of FF4 and wasn't to thrilled. I don't know what could move me from Chrome.
|
Take a look at Rockmelt based off chromium but if you use a lot of social networks you may change.. kind of.
__________________
:: André Allen Communications, Community and Channel
:: iWeb.com - Dedicated, Cloud, Colocation
:: Managed, Guaranteed IOPS Cloud Servers, - Money back Guarantee http://www.iweb.com
|

03-22-2011, 01:01 PM
|
|
the sauce boss
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 570
|
|
I will stick to chrome. Even though I have a beast workstation with tons of power, firefox still uses too much memory and is too slow for my tastes. Even version 4. Chrome still yields better results for loading times and overall quickness. It just feels much snappier.
|

03-22-2011, 01:11 PM
|
|
Performance Specialist
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 10,338
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBox
I will stick to chrome. Even though I have a beast workstation with tons of power, firefox still uses too much memory and is too slow for my tastes. Even version 4. Chrome still yields better results for loading times and overall quickness. It just feels much snappier.
|
I agree. I keep Firefox as a secondary browser but for the most part Chrome works noticeably better on even my highest end machine.
|

03-22-2011, 01:18 PM
|
|
Into the night
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: on the ninkynonk!
Posts: 907
|
|
Wow scrolling is really smooth! Sites are way more responsive! Good job Firefox team!
Now the only thing I dislike is the bottom bar portion where you see the hovered URL only appears when it's hovered in a little tooltip... strange, but tolerable. still getting used to the top tabs...
__________________
██ Something awesome
██ coming soon....
|

03-22-2011, 01:45 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 681
|
|
Lost ... status bar ... noooooo
__________________
Helm 3 - 4 Control Panel Setup / WebSitePanel / Hosting Controller / Installation / Configuration / Troubleshooting / Migrations
Windows Server Management / Security / Hardening
I speak English and Spanish
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|