Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
02-27-2011, 06:03 AM #1Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 31
KnownHost VS2 VS Wiredtree VPS512
Hi,
Please check and let me know that which vps is more powerful from the following. So i can decide which one is better for my webs.
KnownHost VS2
Detail : http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1014772
Wiredtree VPS512
Detail : http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=990392
Please all the requested members let me know which vps will be better for me my webs have lots of visitor and they take lots bandwidth and memory usage.
Thanks
-
02-27-2011, 07:42 AM #2Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 13
KnownHost VS2:
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: s102.xxx.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-028stab070.14 -- #1 SMP Thu Nov 18 16:04:02 MSK 2010
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4787.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4787.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 8: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 9: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4787.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 10: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 12: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 13: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 14: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 15: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4788.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
11:28:28 up 26 days, 9:43, 1 user, load average: 0.21, 0.07, 0.02; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 29 2011 11:28:28 - 11:56:19
16 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10313730.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2134.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2109.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 490426.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 138070.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1122844.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 969382.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 33959.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8760.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3011.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 773.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 821741.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10313730.7 883.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2134.3 388.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 2109.1 490.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 490426.3 1238.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 138070.3 834.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1122844.4 1935.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 969382.7 779.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 33959.1 84.9
Process Creation 126.0 8760.0 695.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3011.3 710.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 773.7 1289.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 821741.7 547.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 667.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 29 2011 11:56:19 - 12:24:46
16 CPUs in system; running 16 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 80575948.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 29675.6 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9654.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 440287.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 126128.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1139967.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 7753782.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2347895.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 25113.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18915.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2591.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5600052.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 80575948.4 6904.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 29675.6 5395.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 9654.4 2245.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 440287.0 1111.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 126128.6 762.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1139967.3 1965.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7753782.1 6232.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2347895.0 5869.7
Process Creation 126.0 25113.5 1993.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18915.3 4461.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2591.6 4319.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5600052.5 3733.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3080.7
Wiredtree VPS512:
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: s100.xxx.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-028stab070.10 -- #1 SMP Thu Oct 21 13:44:25 MSD 2010
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 8: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 9: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4521.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 10: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 12: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 13: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 14: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 15: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4522.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
11:31:24 up 11 days, 5:02, 1 user, load average: 0.50, 0.39, 0.30; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 29 2011 11:31:24 - 12:04:02
16 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 8860742.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1988.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2210.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 402010.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 119966.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 962885.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 846332.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 27279.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8222.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3724.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1610.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 746179.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 8860742.4 759.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1988.8 361.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 2210.5 514.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 402010.6 1015.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 119966.8 724.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 962885.9 1660.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 846332.9 680.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 27279.7 68.2
Process Creation 126.0 8222.0 652.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3724.2 878.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1610.0 2683.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 746179.5 497.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 654.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 29 2011 12:04:02 - 12:39:23
16 CPUs in system; running 16 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 74937048.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 29454.3 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8504.2 lps (29.2 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 639015.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 118818.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1008139.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 7611853.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2308480.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22476.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17371.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2303.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5263289.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 74937048.4 6421.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 29454.3 5355.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 8504.2 1977.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 639015.9 1613.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 118818.2 717.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1008139.0 1738.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7611853.8 6118.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2308480.3 5771.2
Process Creation 126.0 22476.6 1783.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17371.4 4097.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2303.9 3839.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5263289.2 3508.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2972.7
-
02-27-2011, 07:47 AM #3The Linux Specialist
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- /root
- Posts
- 23,990
Nice Benchmarks. Are those VPS yours DimitriusR?
Specially 4 U
Reseller Hosting: Boost Your Websites | Fully Managed KVM VPS: 3.20 - 5.00 Ghz, Pure Dedicated Power
JoneSolutions.Com is on the net 24/7 providing stable and reliable web hosting solutions, server management and services since 2001
Debian|Ubuntu|cPanel|DirectAdmin|Enhance|Webuzo|Acronis|Estela|BitNinja|Nginx
-
02-27-2011, 07:49 AM #4Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 31
I don't understand these things can you please let me know the exact answer which one is better and powerful for my webs please
thanks
-
02-27-2011, 07:57 AM #5Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 13
Yes. Last 3 month we have 6 hours downtime with KnownHost and 3х2 hours downtime with Wiredtree. They are similar, but KnownHost a little more stable last 3 month.
-
02-27-2011, 07:58 AM #6Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 31
if i'lll see the score index its shows Knownhost is more powerful right ?
-
02-27-2011, 08:00 AM #7Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 31
i have used both vps with my webs but knownhost showing that i am getting to much memory so my webs getting down and on wirdtree there have no memory issue.
-
02-27-2011, 08:11 AM #8Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 13
Knownhost is more powerful for less money (9$).
Issue happen everywhere, our today memory issue at wiredtree:
OOM killed process httpd (pid=31194, ve=130110) exited, free=276499 gen=80953.
OOM killed process php (pid=27263, ve=130110) exited, free=300772 gen=80954.
OOM killed process php (pid=27271, ve=130110) exited, free=301797 gen=80955.
OOM killed process php (pid=31474, ve=130110) exited, free=301582 gen=80956.
OOM killed process httpd (pid=22743, ve=130110) exited, free=303845 gen=80957.
OOM killed process php (pid=27274, ve=130110) exited, free=303442 gen=80958.
OOM killed process php (pid=6593, ve=130110) exited, free=314044 gen=80959.
OOM killed process httpd (pid=26945, ve=130110) exited, free=317237 gen=80960.
If the memory is important go with ServInt, we havn't any memory issue at Essential VPS with >200 Drupal accounts.
-
02-27-2011, 09:24 AM #9Disabled
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 293
Go with first one.
-
02-27-2011, 10:44 AM #10Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- /global/asia/vn
- Posts
- 435
i used both, and i want to say both of them are good. But, i recommend Knownhost cos their support are very professional. They always solve my problem so fast and always let me know what happended included command lines which they used to solve problem.
-
02-27-2011, 12:18 PM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 1,785
How can you fault any host because your VPS ran out of memory when you control the memory limit on the VPS?
Similar Threads
-
WiredTree or KnownHost
By Kriz in forum VPS HostingReplies: 19Last Post: 07-26-2010, 03:17 PM -
KnownHost or WiredTree? Help me Please
By iLLuSi0nS in forum VPS HostingReplies: 15Last Post: 01-15-2010, 05:19 AM -
Which is better WiredTree or KnownHost?
By JoyceBabu in forum VPS HostingReplies: 8Last Post: 10-06-2008, 06:14 PM -
WiredTree: 2008 Super Specials - ONE WEEK ONLY EACH - WEEK 2 of 3: 50% off VPS512
By WebHosting Zac in forum VPS Hosting OffersReplies: 12Last Post: 10-01-2008, 09:37 AM -
WiredTree: 2008 Super Specials - WEEK 3 of 3: Hybrid + VPS512 Specials!
By WebHosting Zac in forum VPS Hosting OffersReplies: 8Last Post: 02-22-2008, 06:58 PM