Originally Posted by Crandion
We push some server backups to Rackspace with Duplicity and don't really have anything bad to say about them. Low price per GB and stable. Amazon S3 would be naturally another option, but haven't tried them out since Rackspace has been working flawlessly so far.
I couldn't find any explanation to cloud files survivability. As we know, Amazon S3 come with this "Designed to provide 99.999999999% durability and 99.99% availability of objects over a given year.", and cheaper "Reduced Redundancy Storage" as well. -- http://aws.amazon.com/s3/
Is could files equivalent to Amazon S3 or RSS?