Results 1 to 7 of 7

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Server 4 You.. any adivce

    hi to all

    am planning to rent dedicated server from this company .. I Read some review but it's was old since 2007 .. I think maybe think have change ... also they have good place in alexa traffic

    am not planning to make vps .. I want just to host Java server on it for my company ...

    so do advice me to take from them ??

    plz excuse me for my English ...

    www.server4you.net

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    2,762
    Just use the search button above and type in "server4you" and you'll get a list of threads with their name in it. Read the reviews and etc. It's from 2011 and quite recent too.
    Aaron Ong
    Dedicated Servers - 100TB Servers - 100Mbps Unmetered Servers - Web Hosting - CDN Network
    Servers in Central, East/West Coast USA, EUROPE and ASIA
    Welltodo Century
    - www.welltodocentury.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    238
    I've heard lots of horror stories about them. You might want to check their reviews.

    Also, the addons are costly $7.5/IP. Not to mention the bizzare policies they have in place.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,272
    Quote Originally Posted by tepid View Post
    I've heard lots of horror stories about them. You might want to check their reviews.

    Also, the addons are costly $7.5/IP. Not to mention the bizzare policies they have in place.
    They have all kinds of hidden fees. Not only do you have to pay $7.5/IP you have to pay a monthly fee to get RDNS. They start cheap but they nickel and dime you.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    so cal
    Posts
    234
    A fee to get rdns o_0?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Antalya / Turkey
    Posts
    29
    I can see people trying to ******** on server4you. Actually there is options.. not hidden fees.

    You can check Price list as PDF: http://www.server4you.com/templates/...y_pr_us_en.pdf
    Each further IP is 1$.

    There is good packages that not include in servers by default. So you can get it as option if you really want/need.
    http://www.server4you.com/root-serve...er-premium.php
    I am using "Complete Package" 29$ / month and it gives me PremiumReboot, PremiumRestore, PremiumRecovery, PremiumBackup, PremiumReverse.

    A server can easily work without those. But i am again saying those are options not mandatory. PremiumBackup is basically worth 29$ alone imho.

    "With PremiumBackup you can completely backup all the data on your server, since it offers you backup space matching the size of your server's hard disks."

    That means if you have 1500GB server, you will have a 1500GB special ftp account that you can use as backup. I am saying special ftp because you can only reach that ftp from your server so its not public. That means its enough secure. No bandwidth limit, no any other limit on this ftp backup account.

    Just give me 1 more company name that will give you 1500GB remote backup. Because i couldnt find any other company works like those guys. Dont you need that? Just dont buy it. ITS OPTION not hidden fee!


    Servers are good enough imo. You can compare with other company servers in there:
    http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=924581
    Used this code:
    ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
    ========================================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

    System: hostname.mycompany.com: GNU/Linux
    OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 -- #1 SMP Fri Apr 1 18:41:58 EDT 2011
    Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
    Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
    CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5054.1 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
    CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5054.0 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
    CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5054.0 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
    CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5053.8 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
    CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5053.9 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
    CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5054.0 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
    CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5053.9 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
    CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (5054.0 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
    12:37:43 up 10 min, 1 user, load average: 1.38, 1.13, 0.67; runlevel 3

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 18 2011 12:37:43 - 13:01:58
    8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 14366068.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 3028.5 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 2293.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 1670795.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 93184.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 7770.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3673.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1095.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1654.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 3380667.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14366068.6 1231.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3028.5 550.6
    Execl Throughput 43.0 2293.5 533.4
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1670795.7 1343.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 93184.5 233.0
    Process Creation 126.0 7770.5 616.7
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3673.5 866.4
    Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 1095.5 ---
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1654.0 2756.7
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 3380667.1 2253.8
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 896.9

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 18 2011 13:01:58 - 13:25:54
    8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 58171398.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 19535.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 27701.5 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 6876809.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 1894346.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 86478.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 33330.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 2053.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4163.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 12323398.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 58171398.7 4984.7
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 19535.2 3551.9
    Execl Throughput 43.0 27701.5 6442.2
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6876809.6 5528.0
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1894346.4 4735.9
    Process Creation 126.0 86478.1 6863.3
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 33330.7 7861.0
    Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 2053.2 ---
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4163.7 6939.5
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 12323398.8 8215.6
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 5938.5

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    351
    As well as them not enabling virtualisation, I've read way too many bad reviews personally about them,
    Plus as has been said, they really do pile on the $/£ as time goes by.

Similar Threads

  1. need adivce
    By arwa in forum Dedicated Server
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-27-2009, 09:03 PM
  2. Norwegian Adivce
    By hostmyserver in forum Running a Web Hosting Business
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-17-2008, 04:01 PM
  3. In need of adivce L@@K!
    By dale1991 in forum Programming Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-09-2006, 07:35 PM
  4. Need some adivce.
    By dale1991 in forum Programming Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-06-2006, 03:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •