Page 4 of 82 FirstFirst 12345671454 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 2040
  1. #76
    Celeron 2.4, 512RAM, IDE HD, FreeBSD 5.2.1
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- xor.ordinalovation.cc
    /dev/ad0s1a 2026030 452142 1411806 24% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 03:37:21 CDT 2004
    3:37AM up 10:26, 1 user, load averages: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01

    End Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 03:48:51 CDT 2004
    3:48AM up 10:38, 1 user, load averages: 14.57, 5.90, 2.79


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3593548.3 95.4
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 665.5 80.1
    Execl Throughput 188.3 454.6 24.1
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 5817.0 21.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 3171.0 29.4
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 129122.0 83.9
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 247241.6 22.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 47182.6 30.5
    Process Creation 569.3 1361.5 23.9
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 173.8 38.8
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 201392.4 17.6
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 35.4
      0 Not allowed!

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    Originally posted by ddihosting
    Correct me if I am wrong, but it appears after a little check here that all HT processors and all Opterons are not running that test.

    Maybe a bug in the software?
    My P4 w/HT had the Pipe-based Context Switching result. I'm not sure what's going on. Can someone with dual Xeon or Opteron do a re-make and see if there is any compiler errors?

    # cd <unixbench directory>
    # make clean
    # make
      0 Not allowed!

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    52
    One more VPS from Fluidhosting, this time on a *new* Dell Dual Xeon hardware node
    that's almost empty ATM

    This server has HT enabled and still performed the Pipe-based Context Switching
    and Pipe Throughput tests.

    Code:
    Fluid Hosting VPS "Starter" (166Mhz CPU | 192MB RAM guaranteed)
    Host server: Dell Dual Xeon 3.06Ghz HT enabled 3GB RAM 4x73GB SCSI Raid5
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux 2.4.20-020stab009.22.777-enterprise #1 SMP
    Thu Jun 24 17:32:57 MSD 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    vzfs                   3072000    320683   2751317  11% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 17 16:01:38 EDT 2004
     16:01:38  up 17 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.21, 0.10, 0.04
    
    End Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 17 16:11:55 EDT 2004
     16:11:55  up 28 min,  1 user,  load average: 14.55, 5.92, 2.58
    
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  8488705.4      225.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      692.0       83.3
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     2710.5      143.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    21005.0       78.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     6315.0       58.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   393145.0      255.6
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   401527.0       35.9
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6   100643.7       65.1
    Process Creation                               569.3     8803.3      154.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      653.9      146.0
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   222751.1       19.5
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      90.3
    Richard Park
      0 Not allowed!

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Solar Star system
    Posts
    183
    Originally posted by Yikes2000
    My P4 w/HT had the Pipe-based Context Switching result. I'm not sure what's going on. Can someone with dual Xeon or Opteron do a re-make and see if there is any compiler errors?

    # cd <unixbench directory>
    # make clean
    # make
    make
    Checking distribution of files
    ./pgms exists
    ./src exists
    ./testdir exists
    ./tmp exists
    ./results exists
    gcc -o ./pgms/arithoh -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Darithoh ./src/arith.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/register -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum='register int' ./src/arith.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/short -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=short ./src/arith.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/int -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=int ./src/arith.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/long -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=long ./src/arith.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/float -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=float ./src/arith.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/double -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=double ./src/arith.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/hanoi -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/hanoi.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/syscall -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/syscall.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/context1 -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/context1.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/pipe -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/pipe.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/spawn -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/spawn.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/execl -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/execl.c
    src/execl.c: In function `main':
    src/execl.c:80: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 3)
    src/execl.c:85: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 3)
    cd ./src; gcc -c -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -DHZ= -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall dhry_1.c
    cd ./src; gcc -c -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -DHZ= -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall dhry_2.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/dhry2 -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/dhry_1.o ./src/dhry_2.o
    cd ./src; rm -f dhry_1.o dhry_2.o
    cd ./src; gcc -c -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -DREG=register -DHZ= -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall dhry_1.c
    cd ./src; gcc -c -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -DREG=register -DHZ= -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall dhry_2.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/dhry2reg -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/dhry_1.o ./src/dhry_2.o
    cd ./src; rm -f dhry_1.o dhry_2.o
    gcc -o ./pgms/looper -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/looper.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/fstime -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Dawk=1 ./src/fstime.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/fsbuffer -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Dawk=1 -DFSBUFFER ./src/fstime.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/fsdisk -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Dawk=1 -DFSDISK ./src/fstime.c
    gcc -o ./pgms/whetstone-double -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -DDP -DUNIX -DUNIXBENCH ./src/whets.c -lm


    N.
      0 Not allowed!

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    NEMON,

    LOL... no, no!!! Post the make log *ONLY* if you are missing the "Pipe-based Context Switching" results, such as a dedicated Dual Xeon or Opteron server. Your benchmark was fine.
      0 Not allowed!

  6. #81
    Originally posted by JCJiffy
    Tomsyer P4 2.8GHz, 1GB RAM, 120GB IDE, Fedora C1

    Code:
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux 2.4.22-1.2199.nptl #1 Wed Aug 4 12:21:48 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda2            116824944   2666104 108224432   3% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 16:34:00 CDT 2004
     16:34:00  up 2 days,  2:18,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    
    End Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 16:45:26 CDT 2004
     16:45:26  up 2 days,  2:30,  1 user,  load average: 17.40, 7.01, 3.07
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  3580141.7       95.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      739.8       89.0
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     3376.3      179.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    56607.0      211.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    22302.0      207.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   270950.0      176.1
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   675424.7       60.4
    Process Creation                               569.3    13951.2      245.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      459.0      102.5
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   403609.5       35.3
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     120.2
    Something is weird. I upgraded to Fedora Core 2, and this is what happened to my score.
    Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 #1 Tue Aug 3 09:39:58 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda2            116824944   3358776 107531760   4% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 20:57:22 CDT 2004
     20:57:22 up 17:46,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    
    End Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 21:08:51 CDT 2004
     21:08:51 up 17:57,  1 user,  load average: 12.92, 5.71, 2.63
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  3534014.9       93.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      728.7       87.7
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     2065.1      109.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    28750.0      107.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     8421.0       78.2
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   173537.0      112.8
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   186928.7       16.7
    Process Creation                               569.3     9207.6      161.7
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      331.4       74.0
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   220320.1       19.3
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      71.1
    Last edited by JCJiffy; 08-18-2004 at 10:21 PM.
      0 Not allowed!

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    5,143
    that's indeed weird. And even weirder, your disk performance seems to be affected quite a bit by FC2 upgrade. Also, still weird, you are missing the "Pipe-based Context Switching"

    Hm, perhaps we need to have a better/newer unix benchmark. This one is based on 1999 version of UnixBench, which may very well not accurate at all for the newer CPU generations, as well as being sensitive to the differences in kernels (FreeBSD vs. Linux, etc).
    Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server
      0 Not allowed!

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    525
    duel xeon 2.2 2gig ram scsi hdds

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux ignite.voidhosting.com 2.4.26-grsec #1 SMP Sat Jul 31 13:47:03 C
    EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/sda2 15527940 4704344 10034808 32% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 06:43:05 CEST 2004
    06:43:05 up 6 days, 2:09, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

    End Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 06:53:23 CEST 2004
    06:53:23 up 6 days, 2:19, 1 user, load average: 18.76, 7.41, 3.12


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6858888.8 182.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 468.5 56.4
    Execl Throughput 188.3 4930.7 261.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 25085.0 93.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 6843.0 63.5
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 396914.0 258.0
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 919016.3 82.2
    Process Creation 569.3 10481.7 184.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 225.0 50.2
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 762645.0 66.6
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 107.7
    [root@ignite unixbench-4.1.0-wht]#
      0 Not allowed!

  9. #84
    Originally posted by JCJiffy
    Something is weird. I upgraded to Fedora Core 2, and this is what happened to my score.
    Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 #1 Tue Aug 3 09:39:58 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda2            116824944   3358776 107531760   4% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 20:57:22 CDT 2004
     20:57:22 up 17:46,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    
    End Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 21:08:51 CDT 2004
     21:08:51 up 17:57,  1 user,  load average: 12.92, 5.71, 2.63
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  3534014.9       93.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      728.7       87.7
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     2065.1      109.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    28750.0      107.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     8421.0       78.2
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   173537.0      112.8
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   186928.7       16.7
    Process Creation                               569.3     9207.6      161.7
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      331.4       74.0
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   220320.1       19.3
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      71.1
    I recompiled my kernel from a stock 2.6.8.1 version with specific configs, and this was the result. Still Fedora Core 2. I looked at the original FC2 .config for kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2, and things did not look optimized at all. I'm not sure.

    But the results below now are better than my first FC1 with 2.4.22-1.2199.nptl kernel run.

    Still Tomsyer/Savvis P4 2.8GHz A w/ 1MB L2, 1GB RAM, 120GB IDE.

    Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux 2.6.8.1 #1 Thu Aug 19 01:46:08 CDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda2            116824944   3738936 107151600   4% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 03:19:38 CDT 2004
     03:19:38 up  1:04,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.06
    
    End Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 03:31:46 CDT 2004
     03:31:46 up  1:16,  1 user,  load average: 12.25, 5.50, 2.66
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  3512333.7       93.2
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      748.8       90.1
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     3216.6      170.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    77936.0      291.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    33345.0      309.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   297524.0      193.4
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   760271.3       68.0
    Process Creation                               569.3    12789.2      224.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      431.9       96.4
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5  1126151.2       98.4
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     143.2
    Last edited by JCJiffy; 08-19-2004 at 04:41 AM.
      0 Not allowed!

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    Originally posted by FHDave
    that's indeed weird. And even weirder, your disk performance seems to be affected quite a bit by FC2 upgrade. Also, still weird, you are missing the "Pipe-based Context Switching"

    Hm, perhaps we need to have a better/newer unix benchmark. This one is based on 1999 version of UnixBench, which may very well not accurate at all for the newer CPU generations, as well as being sensitive to the differences in kernels (FreeBSD vs. Linux, etc).
    Although computer architecture has changed since 1999, the way programs are written have not (still compiling the same high level PL into executables). It is the compiler's job, not the program (hence the benchmark)'s job, to utilize the updated hardware. The only change I made to the benchmark is parallelism to account for the webhosting environment. Do you have something else in mind?

    Sensitivity to kernel and OS is always present, as different driver and different code are implemented. I believe Fedora C2 is considered a test bed for Enterprise. As such, optimal performance is neither intended or should be expected. Optimizing kernel configuration is also a must for everyone just as stated in the various FAQ's (Linux and FreeBSD alike).
      0 Not allowed!

  11. #86
    Originally posted by FHDave
    that's indeed weird. And even weirder, your disk performance seems to be affected quite a bit by FC2 upgrade. Also, still weird, you are missing the "Pipe-based Context Switching"
    It is not listed in the results, but I do see the "Pipe-based Context Switching" test as having been run. For some reason it just doesn't show up in the results at the end.
      0 Not allowed!

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    104
    Dual Xeon 2.8, 2GB Ram, SCSI no RAID, RHEL 3, Latest CPanel Current, Custom Compiled 2.6.8 Kernel
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux xeon.galaxisweb.com 2.6.8 #4 SMP Sat Aug 14 23:26:12 CDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/sda3 66176984 8769532 54045852 14% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 22:31:03 CDT 2004
    22:31:03 up 4 days, 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.39, 0.40, 0.33

    End Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 22:41:46 CDT 2004
    22:41:46 up 4 days, 14 min, 1 user, load average: 17.71, 7.45, 3.43


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 7993241.5 212.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 633.6 76.2
    Execl Throughput 188.3 4934.1 262.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 70279.0 263.0
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 24728.0 229.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 398145.0 258.8
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1402005.2 125.4
    Process Creation 569.3 16125.6 283.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 532.8 118.9
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 1107995.8 96.8
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 175.1
      0 Not allowed!

  13. #88

    can't complete benchmark

    I've just upgraded my jvds virtual server and I'm trying to see if I've gotten my money's worth. I keep getting 0's for all the results in the benchmark, and the beginning/end load average hardly changes (0.07 -> 0.21). I've tried running both the benchmark from the prior thread and this current one, as root. Is there something I'm doing wrong? Is this somehow indicative of my actual performance?
      0 Not allowed!

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    1,769
    Here's a Celeron 1100 with 256 MB RAM, IDE, CentOS 3.1:

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux s1 2.4.21-15.0.4.EL #1 Wed Aug 4 01:52:46 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda2 57075548 11126652 43049568 21% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Tue Sep 7 23:16:43 EDT 2004
    23:16:43 up 2:25, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 0.64, 0.32

    End Benchmark Run: Tue Sep 7 23:28:21 EDT 2004
    23:28:21 up 2:37, 1 user, load average: 18.99, 8.09, 3.78


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 2161023.3 57.4
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 614.7 74.0
    Execl Throughput 188.3 939.7 49.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 21611.0 80.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 10081.0 93.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 109246.0 71.0
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 600658.2 53.7
    Process Creation 569.3 2819.7 49.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 100.9 22.5
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 564021.1 49.3
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 56.6
      0 Not allowed!

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    124
    Celeron 2.4, 512MB, 200GB RHES from SM:

    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux tfarchive2.com 2.4.21-4.0.1.EL #1 Thu Oct 23 01:36:33 EDT 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda3 186429144 167589492 9216720 95% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 17:36:13 EDT 2004
    17:36:13 up 101 days, 4:52, 1 user, load average: 0.83, 0.48, 0.34

    End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 17:47:48 EDT 2004
    17:47:48 up 101 days, 5:04, 1 user, load average: 16.08, 7.00, 3.39


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3555869.4 94.4
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 666.3 80.2
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1380.0 73.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 48140.0 180.2
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 17911.0 166.3
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 296884.0 193.0
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 161682.3 104.7
    Process Creation 569.3 3642.6 64.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 258.6 57.7
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 384752.0 33.6
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 91.6

    Seems pretty much the same as other celerons in this thread
      0 Not allowed!

  16. #91
    I'm getting the following on a ServInt VPS (the $49 package). Right now it's running a few messageboards but nothing major. Can someone interpret the numbers for me?

    Code:
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux gamma.webstylists.com 2.4.20-021stab022.3.777-enterprise #1 SMP Wed Aug 4 19:02:12 MSD 2004 i686 i6
    86 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs             10485760   5026170   5459590  48% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep  8 17:57:48 EDT 2004
     17:57:48  up 1 day,  4:18,  1 user,  load average: 0.17, 0.46, 0.50
    
    End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep  8 18:11:12 EDT 2004
     18:11:12  up 1 day,  4:32,  1 user,  load average: 15.29, 7.42, 3.91
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7   862388.1       22.9
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      499.4       60.1
    Execl Throughput                               188.3      262.4       13.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0     3822.0       14.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     1229.0       11.4
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0    39935.0       26.0
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6    35128.1        3.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6    11892.9        7.7
    Process Creation                               569.3      404.5        7.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8       51.7       11.5
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5    16513.0        1.4
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      10.8
      0 Not allowed!

  17. #92
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Sao Paulo/ Brasil
    Posts
    135

    powervps

    Powervps.com

    CPANEL POWER-1
    $44.50 per month

    RedHat Linux
    Equal share CPU
    cPanel/WHM (latest edition)
    Fantastico De-Luxe
    Clientexec
    1GB Burst RAM
    256MB RAM guaranteed
    10GB Disk Space
    150GB Monthly Transfer

    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux host.boxhosts.net 2.4.20-021stab022.3.777-smp #1 SMP Wed Aug 4 19:23:55 MSD 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs 10485760 1791021 8694739 18% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 18:09:34 AMT 2004
    18:09:34 up 1 day, 20:29, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.04, 0.01

    End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 18:20:49 AMT 2004
    18:20:49 up 1 day, 20:40, 1 user, load average: 14.04, 6.05, 2.74

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 2429554.3 64.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 453.3 54.5
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1269.7 67.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 11129.0 41.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 4529.0 42.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 197876.0 128.6
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 200931.8 18.0
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 55830.3 36.1
    Process Creation 569.3 2345.2 41.2
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 220.9 49.3
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 133776.5 11.7
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 42.5
      0 Not allowed!

  18. #93
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    114
    I have noticed that the benchmarks for most VPS's are at about 25% of the values for Dedicated servers. Does this translate to websites performing 4 times slower on a VPS than they would on a dedicated machine?
    Kerry Slavin
    Reliable Solution Internet Services
    http://www.reliablesolution.com
    kerry@reliablesolution.com
      0 Not allowed!

  19. #94
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    35
    This is my first post here, I'm at stat freak so may as well post my benchmark that I ran recently

    Plan: Tektonic Fast Start $15 month. 64MB guaranteed RAM with 4GB burst. 25% weighted CPU, 3GB SCSI disk, 50GB bandwidth. This is the lowest end plan they offer. If I'm still happy later on I'll add more RAM and up my weighted cpu to 50%.

    Host is a Dual Xeon 3.06Ghz, 4GB RAM running Redhat Enterprise AS3.

    Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux (hostname removed) 2.4.20-021stab022.4.777-smp #1 SMP Sat Aug 14 19:44:17 
    MSD 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs              3000000    515996   2484004  18% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep  8 19:21:31 EDT 2004
     19:21:31  up  2:46,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.26, 0.35
    
    End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep  8 19:34:23 EDT 2004
     19:34:23  up  2:59,  2 users,  load average: 14.04, 6.08, 3.01
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES            
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  1505545.1       40.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      562.8       67.7
    Execl Throughput                               188.3      749.3       39.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0     9260.0       34.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     2971.0       27.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   115029.0       74.8
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   124902.6       11.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6    30248.7       19.6
    Process Creation                               569.3      786.6       13.8
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      146.9       32.8
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5    98026.9        8.6
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      27.4
    Overall I'm extremely happy so far. I was able to build PHP5, Postgres 7.4.5 and Apache 1.3.31(2.x segfaults on AS3) and take some of my new code I'm writing at home and test it out. I measure the time it takes to process a page using the php function microtime subtracting the end of the script from the very beginning of executino and I get in the range of 0.016-0.030 seconds, more if I'm compiling This is actually faster than on my home machine which is an AMD 1.4ghz and faster than my current shared hosting company. This tests a mixture of static html and dynamic html with no browser caching. The dynamic part is querying Postgres with two queries where each is a 3-way join to fetch the latest news and articles from my database. It will get more complex than that as I complete the website especially the script database part. There are 5 tables in the database so far and I have a handful of foreign key constraints and a few stored procedures.

    Once I run more tests and am completely satisified I'm going to transfer my existing domain over and try to finish my new site. Also will have a small forum running phpBB for my family.

    Having root access so you can customize and build what you need just beats the pants off of shared hosting. I'm having a blast just playing around
    Last edited by kuato; 09-08-2004 at 08:28 PM.
      0 Not allowed!

  20. #95
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    520
    PIV 2.8, 2 GB, 80 IDE, CentOS 3.1

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux xxxxxx.conepuppy.com 2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0 #1 Sat Mar 6 08:10:10 GMT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda3 78225248 1196240 73055332 2% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 10:02:47 EDT 2004
    10:02:47 up 1 day, 9:31, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00

    End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 10:14:30 EDT 2004
    10:14:30 up 1 day, 9:42, 1 user, load average: 16.89, 7.06, 3.18


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3620347.9 96.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 675.4 81.3
    Execl Throughput 188.3 2370.7 125.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 39789.0 148.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 17868.0 165.9
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 382717.0 248.8
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 676636.1 60.5
    Process Creation 569.3 8314.5 146.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 285.9 63.8
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 403612.7 35.3
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 101.9
      0 Not allowed!

  21. #96
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    520
    Shouldn't mine perform better with these specs? Other PIV 2.8 have a score of 120-140 in this thread?
      0 Not allowed!

  22. #97
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    960
    DefenderHosting VPS Enterprise:

    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux frodo.dewahost.net 2.4.20-021stab022.4.777-enterprise #1 SMP Sat Aug 14 19:22:21 MSD 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs 32276480 2521351 29755129 8% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 10 06:37:00 EDT 2004
    06:37:00 up 6:01, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.08, 0.03

    End Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 10 06:47:16 EDT 2004
    06:47:16 up 6:11, 2 users, load average: 15.00, 6.18, 2.67


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 8101301.2 215.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 681.4 82.0
    Execl Throughput 188.3 2413.2 128.2
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 17204.0 64.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 5793.0 53.8
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 258554.0 168.1
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 284788.7 25.5
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 86438.4 56.0
    Process Creation 569.3 4274.9 75.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 490.7 109.5
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 160051.9 14.0
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 70.6
      0 Not allowed!

  23. #98
    kuato from where did you get your plan???

    Thanks
      0 Not allowed!

  24. #99
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    793
    Originally posted by Dactyl
    kuato from where did you get your plan???

    Thanks
    It's at the top of his post: tektonic

    http://www.tektonic.net/vds.php
      0 Not allowed!

  25. #100
    thanks sea otter i didnt notice it
      0 Not allowed!

Page 4 of 82 FirstFirst 12345671454 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •