Results 76 to 100 of 2040
-
08-18-2004, 04:42 AM #76WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 111
Celeron 2.4, 512RAM, IDE HD, FreeBSD 5.2.1
==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
System -- xor.ordinalovation.cc
/dev/ad0s1a 2026030 452142 1411806 24% /
Start Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 03:37:21 CDT 2004
3:37AM up 10:26, 1 user, load averages: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01
End Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 03:48:51 CDT 2004
3:48AM up 10:38, 1 user, load averages: 14.57, 5.90, 2.79
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3593548.3 95.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 665.5 80.1
Execl Throughput 188.3 454.6 24.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 5817.0 21.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 3171.0 29.4
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 129122.0 83.9
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 247241.6 22.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 47182.6 30.5
Process Creation 569.3 1361.5 23.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 173.8 38.8
System Call Overhead 114433.5 201392.4 17.6
=========
FINAL SCORE 35.40
-
08-18-2004, 05:59 AM #77Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Orange County, CA
- Posts
- 338
Originally posted by ddihosting
Correct me if I am wrong, but it appears after a little check here that all HT processors and all Opterons are not running that test.
Maybe a bug in the software?
# cd <unixbench directory>
# make clean
# make0
-
08-18-2004, 04:15 PM #78Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Posts
- 52
One more VPS from Fluidhosting, this time on a *new* Dell Dual Xeon hardware node
that's almost empty ATM
This server has HT enabled and still performed the Pipe-based Context Switching
and Pipe Throughput tests.
Code:Fluid Hosting VPS "Starter" (166Mhz CPU | 192MB RAM guaranteed) Host server: Dell Dual Xeon 3.06Ghz HT enabled 3GB RAM 4x73GB SCSI Raid5 ============================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht) System -- Linux 2.4.20-020stab009.22.777-enterprise #1 SMP Thu Jun 24 17:32:57 MSD 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux vzfs 3072000 320683 2751317 11% / Start Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 17 16:01:38 EDT 2004 16:01:38 up 17 min, 1 user, load average: 0.21, 0.10, 0.04 End Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 17 16:11:55 EDT 2004 16:11:55 up 28 min, 1 user, load average: 14.55, 5.92, 2.58 TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 8488705.4 225.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 692.0 83.3 Execl Throughput 188.3 2710.5 143.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 21005.0 78.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 6315.0 58.6 File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 393145.0 255.6 Pipe Throughput 111814.6 401527.0 35.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 100643.7 65.1 Process Creation 569.3 8803.3 154.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 653.9 146.0 System Call Overhead 114433.5 222751.1 19.5 ========= FINAL SCORE 90.3
Richard Park0
-
08-18-2004, 05:38 PM #79Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- Solar Star system
- Posts
- 183
Originally posted by Yikes2000
My P4 w/HT had the Pipe-based Context Switching result. I'm not sure what's going on. Can someone with dual Xeon or Opteron do a re-make and see if there is any compiler errors?
# cd <unixbench directory>
# make clean
# make
Checking distribution of files
./pgms exists
./src exists
./testdir exists
./tmp exists
./results exists
gcc -o ./pgms/arithoh -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Darithoh ./src/arith.c
gcc -o ./pgms/register -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum='register int' ./src/arith.c
gcc -o ./pgms/short -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=short ./src/arith.c
gcc -o ./pgms/int -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=int ./src/arith.c
gcc -o ./pgms/long -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=long ./src/arith.c
gcc -o ./pgms/float -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=float ./src/arith.c
gcc -o ./pgms/double -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Ddatum=double ./src/arith.c
gcc -o ./pgms/hanoi -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/hanoi.c
gcc -o ./pgms/syscall -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/syscall.c
gcc -o ./pgms/context1 -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/context1.c
gcc -o ./pgms/pipe -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/pipe.c
gcc -o ./pgms/spawn -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/spawn.c
gcc -o ./pgms/execl -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/execl.c
src/execl.c: In function `main':
src/execl.c:80: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 3)
src/execl.c:85: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 3)
cd ./src; gcc -c -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -DHZ= -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall dhry_1.c
cd ./src; gcc -c -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -DHZ= -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall dhry_2.c
gcc -o ./pgms/dhry2 -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/dhry_1.o ./src/dhry_2.o
cd ./src; rm -f dhry_1.o dhry_2.o
cd ./src; gcc -c -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -DREG=register -DHZ= -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall dhry_1.c
cd ./src; gcc -c -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -DREG=register -DHZ= -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall dhry_2.c
gcc -o ./pgms/dhry2reg -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/dhry_1.o ./src/dhry_2.o
cd ./src; rm -f dhry_1.o dhry_2.o
gcc -o ./pgms/looper -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall ./src/looper.c
gcc -o ./pgms/fstime -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Dawk=1 ./src/fstime.c
gcc -o ./pgms/fsbuffer -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Dawk=1 -DFSBUFFER ./src/fstime.c
gcc -o ./pgms/fsdisk -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -Dawk=1 -DFSDISK ./src/fstime.c
gcc -o ./pgms/whetstone-double -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -fforce-mem -ffast-math -Wall -DDP -DUNIX -DUNIXBENCH ./src/whets.c -lm
N.0
-
08-18-2004, 05:53 PM #80Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Orange County, CA
- Posts
- 338
NEMON,
LOL... no, no!!! Post the make log *ONLY* if you are missing the "Pipe-based Context Switching" results, such as a dedicated Dual Xeon or Opteron server. Your benchmark was fine.0
-
08-18-2004, 10:18 PM #81Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Posts
- 42
Originally posted by JCJiffy
Tomsyer P4 2.8GHz, 1GB RAM, 120GB IDE, Fedora C1
Code:BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht) System -- Linux 2.4.22-1.2199.nptl #1 Wed Aug 4 12:21:48 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux /dev/hda2 116824944 2666104 108224432 3% / Start Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 16:34:00 CDT 2004 16:34:00 up 2 days, 2:18, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 End Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 16:45:26 CDT 2004 16:45:26 up 2 days, 2:30, 1 user, load average: 17.40, 7.01, 3.07 INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3580141.7 95.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 739.8 89.0 Execl Throughput 188.3 3376.3 179.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 56607.0 211.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 22302.0 207.1 File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 270950.0 176.1 Pipe Throughput 111814.6 675424.7 60.4 Process Creation 569.3 13951.2 245.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 459.0 102.5 System Call Overhead 114433.5 403609.5 35.3 ========= FINAL SCORE 120.2
Code:============================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht) System -- Linux 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 #1 Tue Aug 3 09:39:58 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux /dev/hda2 116824944 3358776 107531760 4% / Start Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 20:57:22 CDT 2004 20:57:22 up 17:46, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 End Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 21:08:51 CDT 2004 21:08:51 up 17:57, 1 user, load average: 12.92, 5.71, 2.63 INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3534014.9 93.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 728.7 87.7 Execl Throughput 188.3 2065.1 109.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 28750.0 107.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 8421.0 78.2 File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 173537.0 112.8 Pipe Throughput 111814.6 186928.7 16.7 Process Creation 569.3 9207.6 161.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 331.4 74.0 System Call Overhead 114433.5 220320.1 19.3 ========= FINAL SCORE 71.1
Last edited by JCJiffy; 08-18-2004 at 10:21 PM.
0
-
08-19-2004, 12:38 AM #82Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- PA, USA
- Posts
- 5,143
that's indeed weird. And even weirder, your disk performance seems to be affected quite a bit by FC2 upgrade. Also, still weird, you are missing the "Pipe-based Context Switching"
Hm, perhaps we need to have a better/newer unix benchmark. This one is based on 1999 version of UnixBench, which may very well not accurate at all for the newer CPU generations, as well as being sensitive to the differences in kernels (FreeBSD vs. Linux, etc).Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server0
-
08-19-2004, 12:54 AM #83Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 525
duel xeon 2.2 2gig ram scsi hdds
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
System -- Linux ignite.voidhosting.com 2.4.26-grsec #1 SMP Sat Jul 31 13:47:03 C
EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/sda2 15527940 4704344 10034808 32% /
Start Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 06:43:05 CEST 2004
06:43:05 up 6 days, 2:09, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
End Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 06:53:23 CEST 2004
06:53:23 up 6 days, 2:19, 1 user, load average: 18.76, 7.41, 3.12
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6858888.8 182.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 468.5 56.4
Execl Throughput 188.3 4930.7 261.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 25085.0 93.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 6843.0 63.5
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 396914.0 258.0
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 919016.3 82.2
Process Creation 569.3 10481.7 184.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 225.0 50.2
System Call Overhead 114433.5 762645.0 66.6
=========
FINAL SCORE 107.7
[root@ignite unixbench-4.1.0-wht]#0
-
08-19-2004, 04:37 AM #84Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Posts
- 42
Originally posted by JCJiffy
Something is weird. I upgraded to Fedora Core 2, and this is what happened to my score.
Code:============================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht) System -- Linux 2.6.7-1.494.2.2 #1 Tue Aug 3 09:39:58 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux /dev/hda2 116824944 3358776 107531760 4% / Start Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 20:57:22 CDT 2004 20:57:22 up 17:46, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 End Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 18 21:08:51 CDT 2004 21:08:51 up 17:57, 1 user, load average: 12.92, 5.71, 2.63 INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3534014.9 93.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 728.7 87.7 Execl Throughput 188.3 2065.1 109.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 28750.0 107.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 8421.0 78.2 File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 173537.0 112.8 Pipe Throughput 111814.6 186928.7 16.7 Process Creation 569.3 9207.6 161.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 331.4 74.0 System Call Overhead 114433.5 220320.1 19.3 ========= FINAL SCORE 71.1
But the results below now are better than my first FC1 with 2.4.22-1.2199.nptl kernel run.
Still Tomsyer/Savvis P4 2.8GHz A w/ 1MB L2, 1GB RAM, 120GB IDE.
Code:============================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht) System -- Linux 2.6.8.1 #1 Thu Aug 19 01:46:08 CDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux /dev/hda2 116824944 3738936 107151600 4% / Start Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 03:19:38 CDT 2004 03:19:38 up 1:04, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.06 End Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 03:31:46 CDT 2004 03:31:46 up 1:16, 1 user, load average: 12.25, 5.50, 2.66 INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3512333.7 93.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 748.8 90.1 Execl Throughput 188.3 3216.6 170.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 77936.0 291.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 33345.0 309.6 File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 297524.0 193.4 Pipe Throughput 111814.6 760271.3 68.0 Process Creation 569.3 12789.2 224.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 431.9 96.4 System Call Overhead 114433.5 1126151.2 98.4 ========= FINAL SCORE 143.2
Last edited by JCJiffy; 08-19-2004 at 04:41 AM.
0
-
08-19-2004, 04:43 AM #85Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Orange County, CA
- Posts
- 338
Originally posted by FHDave
that's indeed weird. And even weirder, your disk performance seems to be affected quite a bit by FC2 upgrade. Also, still weird, you are missing the "Pipe-based Context Switching"
Hm, perhaps we need to have a better/newer unix benchmark. This one is based on 1999 version of UnixBench, which may very well not accurate at all for the newer CPU generations, as well as being sensitive to the differences in kernels (FreeBSD vs. Linux, etc).
Sensitivity to kernel and OS is always present, as different driver and different code are implemented. I believe Fedora C2 is considered a test bed for Enterprise. As such, optimal performance is neither intended or should be expected. Optimizing kernel configuration is also a must for everyone just as stated in the various FAQ's (Linux and FreeBSD alike).0
-
08-19-2004, 07:08 PM #86Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Posts
- 42
Originally posted by FHDave
that's indeed weird. And even weirder, your disk performance seems to be affected quite a bit by FC2 upgrade. Also, still weird, you are missing the "Pipe-based Context Switching"
0
-
08-19-2004, 11:44 PM #87WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Washington DC
- Posts
- 104
Dual Xeon 2.8, 2GB Ram, SCSI no RAID, RHEL 3, Latest CPanel Current, Custom Compiled 2.6.8 Kernel
==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
System -- Linux xeon.galaxisweb.com 2.6.8 #4 SMP Sat Aug 14 23:26:12 CDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/sda3 66176984 8769532 54045852 14% /
Start Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 22:31:03 CDT 2004
22:31:03 up 4 days, 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.39, 0.40, 0.33
End Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 19 22:41:46 CDT 2004
22:41:46 up 4 days, 14 min, 1 user, load average: 17.71, 7.45, 3.43
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 7993241.5 212.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 633.6 76.2
Execl Throughput 188.3 4934.1 262.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 70279.0 263.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 24728.0 229.6
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 398145.0 258.8
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1402005.2 125.4
Process Creation 569.3 16125.6 283.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 532.8 118.9
System Call Overhead 114433.5 1107995.8 96.8
=========
FINAL SCORE 175.10
-
09-07-2004, 10:43 PM #88New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 1
can't complete benchmark
I've just upgraded my jvds virtual server and I'm trying to see if I've gotten my money's worth. I keep getting 0's for all the results in the benchmark, and the beginning/end load average hardly changes (0.07 -> 0.21). I've tried running both the benchmark from the prior thread and this current one, as root. Is there something I'm doing wrong? Is this somehow indicative of my actual performance?
0
-
09-07-2004, 11:30 PM #89Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 1,769
Here's a Celeron 1100 with 256 MB RAM, IDE, CentOS 3.1:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
System -- Linux s1 2.4.21-15.0.4.EL #1 Wed Aug 4 01:52:46 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/hda2 57075548 11126652 43049568 21% /
Start Benchmark Run: Tue Sep 7 23:16:43 EDT 2004
23:16:43 up 2:25, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 0.64, 0.32
End Benchmark Run: Tue Sep 7 23:28:21 EDT 2004
23:28:21 up 2:37, 1 user, load average: 18.99, 8.09, 3.78
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 2161023.3 57.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 614.7 74.0
Execl Throughput 188.3 939.7 49.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 21611.0 80.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 10081.0 93.6
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 109246.0 71.0
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 600658.2 53.7
Process Creation 569.3 2819.7 49.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 100.9 22.5
System Call Overhead 114433.5 564021.1 49.3
=========
FINAL SCORE 56.60
-
09-08-2004, 05:38 PM #90WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Ottawa, Canada
- Posts
- 124
Celeron 2.4, 512MB, 200GB RHES from SM:
==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
System -- Linux tfarchive2.com 2.4.21-4.0.1.EL #1 Thu Oct 23 01:36:33 EDT 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/hda3 186429144 167589492 9216720 95% /
Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 17:36:13 EDT 2004
17:36:13 up 101 days, 4:52, 1 user, load average: 0.83, 0.48, 0.34
End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 17:47:48 EDT 2004
17:47:48 up 101 days, 5:04, 1 user, load average: 16.08, 7.00, 3.39
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3555869.4 94.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 666.3 80.2
Execl Throughput 188.3 1380.0 73.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 48140.0 180.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 17911.0 166.3
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 296884.0 193.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 161682.3 104.7
Process Creation 569.3 3642.6 64.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 258.6 57.7
System Call Overhead 114433.5 384752.0 33.6
=========
FINAL SCORE 91.6
Seems pretty much the same as other celerons in this thread0
-
09-08-2004, 06:14 PM #91WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 146
I'm getting the following on a ServInt VPS (the $49 package). Right now it's running a few messageboards but nothing major. Can someone interpret the numbers for me?
Code:BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht) System -- Linux gamma.webstylists.com 2.4.20-021stab022.3.777-enterprise #1 SMP Wed Aug 4 19:02:12 MSD 2004 i686 i6 86 i386 GNU/Linux /dev/vzfs 10485760 5026170 5459590 48% / Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 17:57:48 EDT 2004 17:57:48 up 1 day, 4:18, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.46, 0.50 End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 18:11:12 EDT 2004 18:11:12 up 1 day, 4:32, 1 user, load average: 15.29, 7.42, 3.91 INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 862388.1 22.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 499.4 60.1 Execl Throughput 188.3 262.4 13.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 3822.0 14.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 1229.0 11.4 File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 39935.0 26.0 Pipe Throughput 111814.6 35128.1 3.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 11892.9 7.7 Process Creation 569.3 404.5 7.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 51.7 11.5 System Call Overhead 114433.5 16513.0 1.4 ========= FINAL SCORE 10.8
0
-
09-08-2004, 06:23 PM #92Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Sao Paulo/ Brasil
- Posts
- 135
powervps
Powervps.com
CPANEL POWER-1
$44.50 per month
RedHat Linux
Equal share CPU
cPanel/WHM (latest edition)
Fantastico De-Luxe
Clientexec
1GB Burst RAM
256MB RAM guaranteed
10GB Disk Space
150GB Monthly Transfer
==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
System -- Linux host.boxhosts.net 2.4.20-021stab022.3.777-smp #1 SMP Wed Aug 4 19:23:55 MSD 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/vzfs 10485760 1791021 8694739 18% /
Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 18:09:34 AMT 2004
18:09:34 up 1 day, 20:29, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.04, 0.01
End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 18:20:49 AMT 2004
18:20:49 up 1 day, 20:40, 1 user, load average: 14.04, 6.05, 2.74
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 2429554.3 64.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 453.3 54.5
Execl Throughput 188.3 1269.7 67.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 11129.0 41.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 4529.0 42.1
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 197876.0 128.6
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 200931.8 18.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 55830.3 36.1
Process Creation 569.3 2345.2 41.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 220.9 49.3
System Call Overhead 114433.5 133776.5 11.7
=========
FINAL SCORE 42.50
-
09-08-2004, 07:22 PM #93WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 114
I have noticed that the benchmarks for most VPS's are at about 25% of the values for Dedicated servers. Does this translate to websites performing 4 times slower on a VPS than they would on a dedicated machine?
Kerry Slavin
Reliable Solution Internet Services
http://www.reliablesolution.com
kerry@reliablesolution.com0
-
09-08-2004, 08:24 PM #94Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 35
This is my first post here, I'm at stat freak so may as well post my benchmark that I ran recently
Plan: Tektonic Fast Start $15 month. 64MB guaranteed RAM with 4GB burst. 25% weighted CPU, 3GB SCSI disk, 50GB bandwidth. This is the lowest end plan they offer. If I'm still happy later on I'll add more RAM and up my weighted cpu to 50%.
Host is a Dual Xeon 3.06Ghz, 4GB RAM running Redhat Enterprise AS3.
Code:============================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht) System -- Linux (hostname removed) 2.4.20-021stab022.4.777-smp #1 SMP Sat Aug 14 19:44:17 MSD 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux /dev/vzfs 3000000 515996 2484004 18% / Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 19:21:31 EDT 2004 19:21:31 up 2:46, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.26, 0.35 End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 19:34:23 EDT 2004 19:34:23 up 2:59, 2 users, load average: 14.04, 6.08, 3.01 INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 1505545.1 40.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 562.8 67.7 Execl Throughput 188.3 749.3 39.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 9260.0 34.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 2971.0 27.6 File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 115029.0 74.8 Pipe Throughput 111814.6 124902.6 11.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 30248.7 19.6 Process Creation 569.3 786.6 13.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 146.9 32.8 System Call Overhead 114433.5 98026.9 8.6 ========= FINAL SCORE 27.4
Once I run more tests and am completely satisified I'm going to transfer my existing domain over and try to finish my new site. Also will have a small forum running phpBB for my family.
Having root access so you can customize and build what you need just beats the pants off of shared hosting. I'm having a blast just playing aroundLast edited by kuato; 09-08-2004 at 08:28 PM.
0
-
09-08-2004, 10:10 PM #95Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Posts
- 520
PIV 2.8, 2 GB, 80 IDE, CentOS 3.1
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
System -- Linux xxxxxx.conepuppy.com 2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0 #1 Sat Mar 6 08:10:10 GMT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/hda3 78225248 1196240 73055332 2% /
Start Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 10:02:47 EDT 2004
10:02:47 up 1 day, 9:31, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00
End Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 8 10:14:30 EDT 2004
10:14:30 up 1 day, 9:42, 1 user, load average: 16.89, 7.06, 3.18
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3620347.9 96.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 675.4 81.3
Execl Throughput 188.3 2370.7 125.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 39789.0 148.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 17868.0 165.9
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 382717.0 248.8
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 676636.1 60.5
Process Creation 569.3 8314.5 146.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 285.9 63.8
System Call Overhead 114433.5 403612.7 35.3
=========
FINAL SCORE 101.90
-
09-08-2004, 10:19 PM #96Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Posts
- 520
Shouldn't mine perform better with these specs? Other PIV 2.8 have a score of 120-140 in this thread?
0
-
09-10-2004, 10:34 AM #97Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Posts
- 960
DefenderHosting VPS Enterprise:
==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
System -- Linux frodo.dewahost.net 2.4.20-021stab022.4.777-enterprise #1 SMP Sat Aug 14 19:22:21 MSD 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/vzfs 32276480 2521351 29755129 8% /
Start Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 10 06:37:00 EDT 2004
06:37:00 up 6:01, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.08, 0.03
End Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 10 06:47:16 EDT 2004
06:47:16 up 6:11, 2 users, load average: 15.00, 6.18, 2.67
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 8101301.2 215.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 681.4 82.0
Execl Throughput 188.3 2413.2 128.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 17204.0 64.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 5793.0 53.8
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 258554.0 168.1
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 284788.7 25.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 86438.4 56.0
Process Creation 569.3 4274.9 75.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 490.7 109.5
System Call Overhead 114433.5 160051.9 14.0
=========
FINAL SCORE 70.60
-
09-10-2004, 10:50 AM #98Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 678
kuato from where did you get your plan???
Thanks0
-
09-10-2004, 11:16 AM #99the cloud is a lie
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- NYC
- Posts
- 793
Originally posted by Dactyl
kuato from where did you get your plan???
Thanks
http://www.tektonic.net/vds.php0
-
09-10-2004, 11:33 AM #100Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 678
thanks sea otter i didnt notice it
0