Results 126 to 131 of 131
Thread: litespeed http server review
-
11-10-2012, 06:52 PM #126New Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 1
I use litespeed in my server for 2 years,maybe 3,is not faster than nginx,
i can say that in a server with all the kinds of sites, tubes/forums/joomla cmd/static pages litespeed was using 2 times more CPU power/i had double load, BUT when i tried to migrate to nginx i had really a lot of problems and i lost 2 weeks and money paying people to fix all problems, problems with out end and at the end i returned back to the litespeed.
Their support (litespeed) is one of the worst i ever seen and the rates are the same with 2-3 years ago when the max cores of a server were 8.
This is my experiense with litespeed and nginx.
Ps: Sorry for my english
-
02-23-2013, 12:46 PM #127New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Posts
- 3
I just switched from Apache to Litespeed, and right now I'm in the process of installing some things for cPanel / WHM. I will be sure to let everyone know how it all goes like in a week or so to give me time to test drive it.
-
02-23-2013, 12:59 PM #128Disabled
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 2,234
We use LiteSpeed along with Varnish and it's great. Couldn't ask for a better web server
-
02-23-2013, 01:12 PM #129Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Tampa, FL =)
- Posts
- 1,954
LiteSpeed works to a point. If you run a 16thread server like we do, you won't even begin to utilize all that power unless you buy a higher end lic. which in shared hosting you can't typically cover the expenses.
nginx/php-fpm really does a good job for a free configuration.
-
02-25-2013, 05:38 PM #130Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 181
-
02-25-2013, 11:28 PM #131Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- India
- Posts
- 349
Using it for couple of years now, apart from a few issues with running xCachce/APC along with it and having instead having to stick with EAccelerator + Memcache, there is nothing bad I can think of.