Results 2,026 to 2,040 of 2040
-
02-05-2010, 03:53 PM #2026Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- PA, USA
- Posts
- 5,143
I think the mod should close this thread and even discard it.
All of these test results should be taken with a grain of salt. I personally would toss them away, all of these 135 pages of results. The version 4 WHT variant gives very-very poor, in fact unacceptable result, especially in Xen virtualiation.
Version 5.1.2 is the latest version and should be the one used.Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server0
-
02-05-2010, 04:37 PM #2027Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Location
- WebHostingTalk
- Posts
- 8,901
I support the Human Rights Campaign!
Moving to the Tampa, Florida area? Check out life in the suburbs in Trinity, Florida.0
-
02-05-2010, 05:12 PM #2028Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- PA, USA
- Posts
- 5,143
Sirius,
This thread has been confluted with 135 pages of non-sense. Perhaps it will be better to simply close the thread and start a fresh. Otherwise, the benchmark result of 5.1.2 and 4-wht in the same thread would simply create further confusion.
I am compiling some in-depth study of these benchmarks (comparing between 5.1.2 and older 4-wht version, using real server and Xen and Virtuozzo, etc. Not yet ready to publish results. But in the mean time, I think this thread should be closed. Too many hosts (especially running Xen) were blamed for the "poor result" resulting from this flawed benchmark tests. I have seen how this thread bring damages to those hosts.Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server0
-
02-05-2010, 10:25 PM #2029Virtually Flawless ;)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- USA / UK
- Posts
- 4,577
Unix Bench Scores on my new replacement desktop:
AMD Phenom II X2 550 3.1 Ghz Dual Core
ASUS M4A78L-M
2x 1 TB SATAII "Green" 54K RPM Drives in Software Raid I (1 from Western Digital, one from Seagate)
Debian 5 / Linux 2.6.26 Install
Average Power Draw During Run: 0.76 Amps (Lowest: 0.65 Amps, Highest: 0.88 Amps) @ 120 Volts 60 Hz
PHP Code:#
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
#
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
#
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
#
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
#
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
#
#
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
#
#
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
#
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
#
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
#
#
#
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
#
#
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
#
#
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
#
#
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
#
#
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
#
#
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
#
#
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
#
#
2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
#
#
2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
#
#
2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
#
#
2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
#
#
2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
2 x Process Creation 1 2 3
#
#
2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
#
#
2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
#
#
2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
#
#
========================================================================
#
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
#
#
System: te1: GNU/Linux
#
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.26-2-amd64 -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 13 00:12:41 UTC 2010
#
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
#
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
#
CPU 0: AMD Phenom(tm) II X2 550 Processor (6230.1 bogomips)
#
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
#
CPU 1: AMD Phenom(tm) II X2 550 Processor (6230.1 bogomips)
#
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
#
18:52:42 up 14:29, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2
#
#
------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 05 2010 18:52:42 - 19:21:03
#
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
#
#
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16739884.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
#
Double-Precision Whetstone 2814.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
#
Execl Throughput 1849.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 238631.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 62949.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 694843.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
Pipe Throughput 394500.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
#
Pipe-based Context Switching 92801.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
#
Process Creation 3878.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3744.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
#
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 768.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
#
System Call Overhead 432982.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
#
#
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
#
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16739884.9 1434.4
#
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2814.4 511.7
#
Execl Throughput 43.0 1849.1 430.0
#
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 238631.9 602.6
#
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 62949.9 380.4
#
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 694843.5 1198.0
#
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 394500.1 317.1
#
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 92801.4 232.0
#
Process Creation 126.0 3878.8 307.8
#
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3744.4 883.1
#
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 768.4 1280.6
#
System Call Overhead 15000.0 432982.4 288.7
#
========
#
System Benchmarks Index Score 541.9
#
#
------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 05 2010 19:21:03 - 19:49:23
#
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
#
#
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 33398098.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
#
Double-Precision Whetstone 5585.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
#
Execl Throughput 2828.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 202957.4 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
#
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 56591.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 656227.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
Pipe Throughput 790880.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
#
Pipe-based Context Switching 189209.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
#
Process Creation 5694.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
#
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5395.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
#
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 808.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
#
System Call Overhead 812367.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
#
#
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
#
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 33398098.5 2861.9
#
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5585.1 1015.5
#
Execl Throughput 43.0 2828.5 657.8
#
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 202957.4 512.5
#
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 56591.2 341.9
#
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 656227.9 1131.4
#
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 790880.3 635.8
#
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 189209.8 473.0
#
Process Creation 126.0 5694.4 451.9
#
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5395.5 1272.5
#
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 808.8 1348.0
#
System Call Overhead 15000.0 812367.0 541.6
#
========
#
System Benchmarks Index Score 776.2
PHP Code:#
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
#
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
#
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
#
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
#
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
#
#
4 1 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
#
44 11
#
v v 4 4 1
#
v v 44444 1 v4.1 revisions mostly by David C. Niemi,
#
v 4 o 111 - WHT.2 Reston, VA, USA <niemi@tux.org>
#
#
WHT Variant by Andy A. Lee <andylee@dslextreme.com>
#
See: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=308055
#
#
#
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2
#
#
Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2
#
#
Execl Throughput 1
#
#
Filesystem Throughput 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1
#
#
Filesystem Throughput 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1
#
#
Filesystem Throughput 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1
#
#
Pipe Throughput 1 2
#
#
Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2
#
#
Process Creation 1
#
#
System Call Overhead 1 2
#
#
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1
#
#
==============================================================
#
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
#
System -- Linux xen 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Jan 13 00:12:41 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
#
/dev/mapper/vg0-root 19223252 1055764 17191004 6% /
#
#
Start Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 5 20:07:30 CST 2010
#
20:07:30 up 15:44, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.13, 1.03
#
#
End Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 5 20:18:01 CST 2010
#
20:18:01 up 15:55, 1 user, load average: 11.05, 5.02, 2.81
#
#
#
INDEX VALUES
#
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
#
#
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 12083175.7 320.7
#
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1802.0 216.8
#
Execl Throughput 188.3 2848.7 151.3
#
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 103432.0 387.1
#
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 27812.0 258.2
#
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 877491.0 570.5
#
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 180098.4 116.6
#
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 750025.9 67.1
#
Process Creation 569.3 5624.6 98.8
#
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 819.7 183.0
#
System Call Overhead 114433.5 817131.7 71.4
#
=========
#
FINAL SCORE 179.0
WHT UnixBench = 179
Yes, even on a dual core there is a significant difference.
Agreed.→ RAM Host -- USA Premium & Budget Linux Hosting
█ Featuring Powerful cPanel Shared Hosting
█ & Premium Virtual Dedicated Servers
→ Follow us on Twitter0
-
02-05-2010, 10:44 PM #2030Virtually Flawless ;)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- USA / UK
- Posts
- 4,577
http://ramnet.us/dnl/unixbench-5.1.2.tar.gz
I'll be glad to provide bandwidth for this
Mine is exactly like the official copy except the Makefile is modified to not build the graphics tests (which causes the compile to fail on most servers):
GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined
changed to:
#GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined
=====
Otherwise, if you prefer, the "official" copy:
http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com...h-5.1.2.tar.gz
It requires adjustment to the Makefile to make it compile without the graphics tests for those without X11 installed (and the graphics tests are useless on a server anyway - that's why I made my version with the modified Makefile to make it newbie friendly - make and ./Run just like the old one0
-
02-05-2010, 11:40 PM #2031Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- PA, USA
- Posts
- 5,143
Please do not start posting modified source for people to download. That's one of the reason why I can't trust all these non-sense coming from the "modified WHT variant." There is much better way to only select the tests you want. Modifying the original source code is not one of them.
Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server0
-
02-05-2010, 11:41 PM #2032Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Posts
- 4,568
0
-
02-05-2010, 11:45 PM #2033Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- PA, USA
- Posts
- 5,143
Don't start to make variants and distribute them. Let's stick to the original. That's all I am suggesting. If people start to distribute their own "variants" (just like what we have here in this v4 WHT variant), sooner or later "errors" may start to propagate.
Besides, there is a better way to disable the graphic test without modifying the code.Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server0
-
02-06-2010, 12:07 AM #2034Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- PA, USA
- Posts
- 5,143
I am creating a new thread for the UnixBench 5.1.2 test.
Let's close this one.Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server0
-
02-06-2010, 12:34 AM #2035Virtually Flawless ;)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- USA / UK
- Posts
- 4,577
There is a huge difference between what I did and what the original OP of this thread did - I modified none of the source, only changed one line in the make file so it will compile on systems without X11 headers.
The original OP in this thread modified the entire rating scale........basically made a new program.
In any event, new thread goes far beyond my suggestion of only disabling the graphics tests - I find it ironic how the original OP to this thread weighted disk I/O more heavily, yet you in your new thread have decided to discount disk I/O altogether.......not too sure I agree with that logic very much (disk I/O is an important metric in my opinion).0
-
02-06-2010, 02:17 AM #2036Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- PA, USA
- Posts
- 5,143
By disabling the graphic I/O you are also saying that not all test included in the Unixbench package is relevant.
Anyway ramnet, not trying to argue with you here. My apology if I come out strong. If you don't mind, I will contact you in private regarding the disk I/O test. I have my doubt on this test, really.Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server0
-
02-06-2010, 02:28 AM #2037Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- India
- Posts
- 843
dual xeon 5430 with 16GB ram and 6*1.5TB HDD in RAID10
System Benchmarks Index Score 2927.5
PHP Code:root@server2 [~/unixbench-5.1.2]# ./Run
make all
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/unixbench-5.1.2'
Checking distribution of files
./pgms exists
./src exists
./testdir exists
./tmp exists
./results exists
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/unixbench-5.1.2'
sh: 3dinfo: command not found
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Process Creation 1 2 3
8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: server2.hostxweb.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-164.el5 -- #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 2009
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (5333.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (5333.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (5333.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (5333.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (5333.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (5333.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz (5333.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
23:06:38 up 9 days, 16:44, 1 user, load average: 0.63, 0.50, 0.40; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 05 2010 23:06:38 - 23:35:53
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 14853621.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3067.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3211.9 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 511012.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 142760.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 756265.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1019119.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 130507.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 12971.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6430.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2755.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 827313.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14853621.2 1272.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3067.3 557.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 3211.9 746.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 511012.5 1290.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 142760.9 862.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 756265.0 1303.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1019119.2 819.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 130507.0 326.3
Process Creation 126.0 12971.2 1029.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6430.4 1516.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2755.2 4592.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 827313.1 551.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 982.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 05 2010 23:35:53 - 00:05:44
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 108810714.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 24445.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 19514.9 lps (29.4 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 214208.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 54145.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 478547.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 7628409.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2342523.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 64112.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 29084.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3894.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2660552.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 108810714.1 9324.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 24445.9 4444.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 19514.9 4538.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 214208.9 540.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 54145.8 327.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 478547.7 825.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7628409.9 6132.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2342523.0 5856.3
Process Creation 126.0 64112.8 5088.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 29084.5 6859.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3894.0 6490.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2660552.4 1773.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2927.5
root@server2 [~/unixbench-5.1.2]#
HostNotch Hosting Services 99.9% uptime Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting
yajur | Sales Team
CPanel Hosting • R1 Soft • Offsite-Backup • Great Uptime
http://hostnotch.com sales @ hostnotch.com0
-
02-06-2010, 02:37 AM #2038Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- PA, USA
- Posts
- 5,143
Strange, it seems to me on the second run the Disk I/O performance is always much reduced significantly. I have seen this on three out of the four tests so far.
Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server0
-
02-09-2010, 10:35 PM #2039Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Jakarta, Indonesia
- Posts
- 93
Xeon E5530, RAM 6 GB DDR3-1066, 4 x 146 GB SAS RAID 5.
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10317323.2 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2187.8 MWIPS (10.2 secs, 10 samples)
System Call Overhead 1531374.9 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Pipe Throughput 897855.2 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 159342.0 lps (10.0 secs, 10 samples)
Process Creation 6670.8 lps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Execl Throughput 2272.3 lps (29.7 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1753231.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 851619.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 570868.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 456095.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 232454.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 152603.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4314723.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Write 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2544689.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1584289.0 KBps (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5339.3 lpm (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2300.0 lpm (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1318.3 lpm (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = short) 2260122.5 lps (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = int) 2176413.9 lps (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = long) 2219563.8 lps (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = float) 1028110.1 lps (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithmetic Test (type = double) 1005370.4 lps (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
Arithoh 0.0 lps (10.0 secs, 3 samples)
C Compiler Throughput 1155.0 lpm (60.0 secs, 3 samples)
Dc: sqrt(2) to 99 decimal places 85447.2 lpm (30.0 secs, 3 samples)
Recursion Test--Tower of Hanoi 129009.7 lps (20.0 secs, 3 samples)
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10317323.2 884.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2187.8 397.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 2272.3 528.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 570868.0 1441.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 152603.0 922.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1584289.0 2731.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 897855.2 721.7
Process Creation 126.0 6670.8 529.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2300.0 3833.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1531374.9 1020.9
=========
FINAL SCORE 1000.90
-
02-10-2010, 03:07 AM #2040Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 3,944
I don't see much of a difference between 5.1 and this except for the obvious higher scores in CPU and lower scores in disk. The original unixbench 4 was the same way, the WHT variant put more emphasis on disk to make it more relevant to web hosting.
It looks like Xen servers are still benchmarking poorly with 5.1 as compared to what OpenVZ/original dedicated servers do. Xen performs poorly in context based switching which is one of the benchmarks done. They still have not figured a way to lower overhead as compared to software based solutions such as openvz.0