Page 13 of 33 FirstFirst ... 31011121314151623 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 816
  1. #301
    It may be true but why does powervps give one of the lowest benchmark scores that I have seen on this board? What is different about it compared to others and why can't they improve the situation?
      0 Not allowed!

  2. #302
    From a 256mb DEHE VPS
    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 5004810.3 132.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 757.7 91.2
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1412.1 75.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 77567.0 290.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 22679.0 210.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 552245.0 359.0
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1007804.3 90.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 186735.6 120.9
    Process Creation 569.3 5151.9 90.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 425.9 95.1
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 1536264.8 134.2
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 134.0
      0 Not allowed!

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Amsterdam/Rotterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,135
    Quote Originally Posted by Knownhost - J
    That is a true comment.

    -Jay
    I do not agree with that. If a unixbench is severely affecting site loading speed there simply is a lack of CPU resources (e.g. the server is overbooked or not performing well).
      0 Not allowed!

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    3,407
    Quote Originally Posted by an0maly
    It may be true but why does powervps give one of the lowest benchmark scores that I have seen on this board? What is different about it compared to others and why can't they improve the situation?
    Some host do not site around and worry about getting clients and that is the only reason they really post here. Some of the host you see here with high scores know about this test, changed all their settings to provide good scores, and know people will post the results. It is worth it for them as they basically use WHT for advertising. I have seen this test. I can tell you that if a host has time, then can tweak every aspect to better their score.

    I would not worry about the score as much as the 'real' performance you experience. While this provides insight, it certainly is not an end all for performance and it certainly does not differentiate a good host from a bad. There are far too many other factors that do that.
    BeDifferentSolutions | "For when Indian-based solutions just won't do."
    *We hire, train and manage extremely skilled technical support employees for your business*
    US and European Based Representatives | Dedicated and Semi-Dedicated Options | Level 1/2/3 Skillsets
    Expertise Since 1999 | www.bedifferentsolutions.com | info@bedifferentsolutions.com
      0 Not allowed!

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32
    From DEHE's starter package (256mb), this is after updating the system and installing misc. stuff. No control panel (Cpanel/Plesk/etc) was installed on this system. Guess I'm the slowest of the pack on DEHE eh?
    //Edit: Edited out server name
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux XXXXXX.dehe.com 2.6.8-022stab070.1-entnosplit #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 18:26:08 MSK 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs 10485760 609443 9876317 6% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 20 07:33:16 EDT 2006
    07:33:16 up 25 days, 1:53, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00

    End Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 20 07:44:54 EDT 2006
    07:44:54 up 25 days, 2:04, 1 user, load average: 12.66, 5.56, 2.54


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6185828.5 164.2
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 770.2 92.7
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1701.0 90.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 19898.0 74.5
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 8429.0 78.3
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 281371.0 182.9
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 616223.0 55.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 83115.5 53.8
    Process Creation 569.3 2099.7 36.9
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 203.9 45.5
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 661970.2 57.8
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 75.0
    Last edited by Alystair; 04-20-2006 at 08:02 AM.
      0 Not allowed!

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Amsterdam/Rotterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,135
    Hi Alystair,

    I could be mistaking but from the top of my head your VPS was placed on an isolated node in the past due to load issues with your VPS but I could be mistaking there. If you can contact open a support ticket and specifically ask for me (Andre) I'll check this for you.
      0 Not allowed!

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32
    Nope, I wasn't moved due to load issues (heck the server isn't even live yet!), just needed the latest version of CentOS so you moved me to a new server with Virt3.0 on it. I go by the same name on your own forums, one of your happiest customers

    I'm not too concerned about this benchmark, but I'll take you up on the ticket. The real test comes when we start having people hit the server.
      0 Not allowed!

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Johannesburg,South Africa
    Posts
    601
    This is also on a PowerVPS server. I'm planning up upgrading soon, as I have noticed the server resouces is pretty much constantly between 40% and 60%. I'm not sure if that's right though?

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux [my-host] 2.4.20-021stab028.19.777-enterprise #1 SMP Wed Oct 19 13:05:01 MSD 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs 10485760 7213332 3272428 69% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 20 18:53:46 SAST 2006
    18:53:46 up 28 days, 19:42, 1 user, load average: 0.47, 0.29, 0.26

    End Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 20 19:07:20 SAST 2006
    19:07:21 up 28 days, 19:56, 1 user, load average: 16.56, 8.86, 4.78


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 4220379.1 112.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 990.2 119.2
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1023.1 54.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 119.0 0.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 964.0 9.0
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 93952.0 61.1
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 96419.9 8.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 23296.1 15.1
    Process Creation 569.3 863.8 15.2
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 167.9 37.5
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 206158.1 18.0
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 20.3
      0 Not allowed!

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Amsterdam/Rotterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,135
    Quote Originally Posted by Alystair
    Nope, I wasn't moved due to load issues (heck the server isn't even live yet!), just needed the latest version of CentOS so you moved me to a new server with Virt3.0 on it. I go by the same name on your own forums, one of your happiest customers

    I'm not too concerned about this benchmark, but I'll take you up on the ticket. The real test comes when we start having people hit the server.
    I'd appreciate that, I'm also just interested to see the situation
      0 Not allowed!

  10. #310
    Looks like I squeezed into Unixshell just in time before they locked off taking new orders 'til mid May. Overall I'm seriously loving the performance so far. Times better than powervps. Happy customer.

    UnixShell (The 256 plan):

    Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux host.com 2.6.16-xen #5 SMP Tue Apr 18 16:28:49 EDT 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/sda1             12337072   1070292  10640092  10% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 19 14:00:36 EDT 2006
     14:00:36 up 4 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.18, 0.24, 0.11
    
    End Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 19 14:12:22 EDT 2006
     14:12:22 up 16 min,  1 user,  load average: 13.52, 6.24, 2.92
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  5828750.5      154.7
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1     1156.9      139.2
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     1395.9       74.1
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    42927.0      160.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    14202.0      131.9
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   281956.0      183.3
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   416638.7       37.3
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6    81007.0       52.4
    Process Creation                               569.3     2195.8       38.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      287.5       64.2
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   863871.3       75.5
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      87.4
      0 Not allowed!

  11. #311
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,922
    Quote Originally Posted by UmBillyCord
    I would not worry about the score as much as the 'real' performance you experience. While this provides insight, it certainly is not an end all for performance and it certainly does not differentiate a good host from a bad. There are far too many other factors that do that.
    100% agree. You stated this right on.

    -Jay
    KnownHost Managed VPS Specialists
    Toll Free: (866)-332-9894
    Fully Managed VPS, Wordpress, Cloud Servers, and Dedicated Servers
      0 Not allowed!

  12. #312
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32
    Ran it again at a later date, looks like Apoc was right.
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux XXXXX.dehe.com 2.6.8-022stab070.1-entnosplit #1 SMP Mon Feb 20 18:26:08 MSK 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs 10485760 525683 9960077 6% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 20 19:58:53 EDT 2006
    19:58:53 up 25 days, 14:18, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

    End Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 20 20:10:05 EDT 2006
    20:10:05 up 25 days, 14:30, 1 user, load average: 12.71, 5.63, 2.53


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 8162132.8 216.6
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 787.7 94.8
    Execl Throughput 188.3 464.6 24.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 35935.0 134.5
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 22331.0 207.3
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 582169.0 378.5
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1438329.8 128.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 214650.2 138.9
    Process Creation 569.3 6092.2 107.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 418.7 93.5
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 1535928.4 134.2
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 126.1
      0 Not allowed!

  13. #313
    UnixShell revisited (The 256):

    Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux neilking.com 2.6.16-xen #5 SMP Tue Apr 18 16:28:49 EDT 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/sda1             12337072   2185432   9524952  19% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 21 02:28:44 EDT 2006
     02:28:44 up 1 day,  7:21,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.30, 1.05
    
    End Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 21 02:39:20 EDT 2006
     02:39:20 up 1 day,  7:32,  2 users,  load average: 14.64, 6.36, 3.33
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  9599976.0      254.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1     1309.0      157.5
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     1999.6      106.2
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    76619.0      286.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    23178.0      215.2
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   492629.0      320.3
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   493053.2       44.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6   131821.0       85.3
    Process Creation                               569.3     3683.3       64.7
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      565.4      126.2
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5  1781848.7      155.7
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     139.9
    sweeet!
      0 Not allowed!

  14. #314

    score on Power VPS

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux host.osmundostudio.com 2.6.8-022stab070.5-enterprise #1 SMP Tue Apr 4 22:57:49 MSD 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs 10485760 2217394 8268366 22% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 24 11:32:03 EDT 2006
    11:32:03 up 12 days, 17:19, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.02, 0.01

    End Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 24 11:42:54 EDT 2006
    11:42:54 up 12 days, 17:30, 1 user, load average: 15.08, 6.31, 2.77

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6464775.0 171.6
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 787.4 94.8
    Execl Throughput 188.3 2240.8 119.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 34885.0 130.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 12319.0 114.4
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 409468.0 266.2
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 301211.1 26.9
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 106583.4 69.0
    Process Creation 569.3 5749.8 101.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 450.8 100.6
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 398853.6 34.9
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 94.0
    Moontrail.com
      0 Not allowed!

  15. #315
    I've run the test 4 more times with values of:

    86.3 at 11:32
    89.7 at 12:06
    91.6 at 12:46
    93.0 at 15:34

    I tried placing a heavier load on the server (by running a DBDesigner sychronisation of a database with over 100 tables) and I checked the site's responses during testing. The synchronisation did not notably affect test results (the 89.7 value is actually higher than the test just prior) and the site's responsiveness was as fast as normal during the test.
    Moontrail.com
      0 Not allowed!

  16. #316
    Quote Originally Posted by Extreme75
    Freedom Plan $39.95 / mo at JAGUARPC:COM

    Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux ###################### 2.6.8-022stab067.1-enterprise #1 SMP Mon Jan 23 20:55:01 MSK 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs             20971520   2523105  18448415  13% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 17 23:49:07 COT 2006
     23:49:07 up 1 day, 23:03,  1 user,  load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.01
    
    End Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 18 00:02:15 COT 2006
     00:02:15 up 1 day, 23:17,  1 user,  load average: 14.92, 6.44, 3.00
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                                  BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7    10255452.8        272.2
    Double-Precision Whetstone                          83.1          1322.8        159.2
    Execl Throughput                                       188.3          2331.1        123.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        2672.0         22997.0          86.1
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1077.0          8950.0          83.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks      15382.0      331407.0         215.5
    Pipe Throughput                                    111814.6      378459.0           33.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching                     15448.6      107896.7           69.8
    Process Creation                                           569.3         6114.7         107.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                              44.8          526.7          117.6
    System Call Overhead                             114433.5      451675.5           39.5
                                                                                             =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                                             99.8
    Weird i am on same plan and got vps only today and did the test and got only 87, has jaguar started overloading their vps these days ?

    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 28 01:02:00 CDT 2006
    01:02:00 up 2:20, 0 users, load average: 0.12, 0.26, 0.18

    End Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 28 01:13:24 CDT 2006
    01:13:24 up 2:31, 0 users, load average: 12.32, 5.59, 2.65


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 5212131.3 138.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1276.1 153.6
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1892.0 100.5
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 34876.0 130.5
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 10567.0 98.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 230616.0 149.9
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 324151.5 29.0
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 89326.5 57.8
    Process Creation 569.3 6283.2 110.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 412.7 92.1
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 381665.6 33.4
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 87.6
    Should i cancel my vps? cause i think 99 and 87 a big difference it clealy means i am on overloaded machine.

    Plus the who and wall command is broken and some nelson guy keeps telling me that they are working. Pretty weird huh ?
    ---===Stay Alive====----
      0 Not allowed!

  17. #317
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    531
    stayalive: 87 is a solid score, 12 points really isn't SUCH a big deal. if you're happy with your servers performance, stick with it. don't let numbers from this wildly controversial benchmarking utility make you go hunting for a new VPS!

    My score on my freedom plan used to be at 45-50 on my old node, there was something wrong with the server, everythign was sluggish. i moved to another node, i'm now at 86-95 which i'm happy with. plus performance is fantastic, loads are super low, no issues at all, so i don't care about those numbers! (as long as they weren't like 12!)
      0 Not allowed!

  18. #318
    Quote Originally Posted by stayalive
    Should i cancel my vps? cause i think 99 and 87 a big difference it clealy means i am on overloaded machine.
    I agree with chamelion. Please see the scores I reported on 04-24-2006 at 10:55 AM and 02:55 PM. Over the next two days I, in addition, got the following scores:

    4-25-06
    85.0 at 16:08
    78.7 at 16:39
    88.3 at 17:14

    4-26-06
    77.2 at 10:40

    The average I got of all 10 scores over three days was 85.5 with a range of 77.2 to 94.0. There was no noticeable difference in web site performance between any of those scores.

    I suggest that you run the tests a few more times. However, even a score consistently lower than the 99.8 reported by Extreme75 would not necessarily mean that your server is overloaded.

    I believe that the primary values of this unixbench is to identify very low perfomance (say, significantly below 50, but that is just a rough figure) or to determine if noticable site sluggishness is due to a server overload or another link in the chain. For example, if my VPS running in the historical range of 77-94 suddenly returns a 15 while the site is noticably loading slow, I'll contact my provider about the VPS performance to see what they can do. However, if my site is loading slow while returning an 80, I'll run other diagnostics such as a traceroute to determine where else the problem might lie (in reality though, I'd probably run traceroute first as it is a quicker test).
    Moontrail.com
      0 Not allowed!

  19. #319
    Quote Originally Posted by mbrand
    I agree with chamelion. Please see the scores I reported on 04-24-2006 at 10:55 AM and 02:55 PM. Over the next two days I, in addition, got the following scores:

    4-25-06
    85.0 at 16:08
    78.7 at 16:39
    88.3 at 17:14

    4-26-06
    77.2 at 10:40

    The average I got of all 10 scores over three days was 85.5 with a range of 77.2 to 94.0. There was no noticeable difference in web site performance between any of those scores.

    I suggest that you run the tests a few more times. However, even a score consistently lower than the 99.8 reported by Extreme75 would not necessarily mean that your server is overloaded.

    I believe that the primary values of this unixbench is to identify very low perfomance (say, significantly below 50, but that is just a rough figure) or to determine if noticable site sluggishness is due to a server overload or another link in the chain. For example, if my VPS running in the historical range of 77-94 suddenly returns a 15 while the site is noticably loading slow, I'll contact my provider about the VPS performance to see what they can do. However, if my site is loading slow while returning an 80, I'll run other diagnostics such as a traceroute to determine where else the problem might lie (in reality though, I'd probably run traceroute first as it is a quicker test).
    Ok i tried again and wow this time it lowered (now its done at daytime the above was at night time) .

    Code:
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 28 12:43:03 CDT 2006
     12:43:03 up 10:18,  0 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    
    End Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 28 12:55:07 CDT 2006
     12:55:07 up 10:30,  0 users,  load average: 13.53, 5.99, 2.77
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  3387912.8       89.9
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1     1249.2      150.3
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     1786.9       94.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    26138.0       97.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     9940.0       92.3
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   222480.0      144.6
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   269350.2       24.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6   102453.4       66.3
    Process Creation                               569.3     6568.3      115.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      445.9       99.5
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   433533.5       37.9
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      82.2
    I dunno why its not crossing 90. Almost all those of you at jpc have crossed 90 and i think 82 and 99 a big difference.

    Cheers
    ---===Stay Alive====----
      0 Not allowed!

  20. #320
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    2,288
    you guys place too much importance on these scores IMHO

    If you like we can tweak a node to give you insance scores, Ive seen it personally near 200 for a ve. This can not last on a healthy full node with everyone actually using resources at peak hours.
    Greg Landis | Director of Growth Jaguarpc - Unlock Superior Hosting with JaguarPC
    Managed Servers - Virtual Private Servers | AMD EPYC Dedicated servers
    Follow us @ Facebook.com/Jaguarpc | (888)-338-5261 | greg @ jaguarpc.com
      0 Not allowed!

  21. #321
    But all i need is good stable vps and with good performance i ran those test before moving my account to jpc just to be sure its not overloaded or something messed up cause i see that max ram on that server is 4 gb instead of 8gb as advertised on the site, if i am not mistaken.
    ---===Stay Alive====----
      0 Not allowed!

  22. #322
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    2,288
    You must be setup on a fresh node that ran short on ram. I just ordered 24gig ram to added to a few such nodes. If yours isnt 4gig ram rest assure we know about it and you'll receive a mailing when we plan to add the rest. Should be early next week.
    Greg Landis | Director of Growth Jaguarpc - Unlock Superior Hosting with JaguarPC
    Managed Servers - Virtual Private Servers | AMD EPYC Dedicated servers
    Follow us @ Facebook.com/Jaguarpc | (888)-338-5261 | greg @ jaguarpc.com
      0 Not allowed!

  23. #323
    Quote Originally Posted by Jag
    If yours isnt 4gig ram rest assure we know about it and you'll receive a mailing when we plan to add the rest. Should be early next week.
    You meant if yours is 4gb or yours isnt 8gb right ?
    ---===Stay Alive====----
      0 Not allowed!

  24. #324
    VPS, $59

    256MB Guaranteed, 1 GB Bursted

    Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux ##################### 2.4.20-021stab028.3.777-enterprise #1 SMP Wed Feb 2 21:08:59 MSK 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs             20971520   1133748  19837772   6% /
     
    Start Benchmark Run: Wed May  3 04:15:52 MST 2006
     04:15:52 up 5 days, 23:03,  1 user,  load average: 1.04, 0.30, 0.10
    End Benchmark Run: Wed May  3 04:26:25 MST 2006
     04:26:25 up 5 days, 23:13,  1 user,  load average: 15.12, 6.29, 2.78
     
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  5719660.7      151.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      533.2       64.2
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     2539.2      134.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    27549.0      103.1
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     7472.0       69.4
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   360136.0      234.1
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   380427.2       34.0
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6    72906.5       47.2
    Process Creation                               569.3     2083.3       36.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      417.7       93.2
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   211855.9       18.5
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      70.8
    Last edited by hillord; 05-03-2006 at 07:41 AM.
      0 Not allowed!

  25. #325
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,922
    Quote Originally Posted by Jag
    you guys place too much importance on these scores IMHO

    If you like we can tweak a node to give you insance scores, Ive seen it personally near 200 for a ve. This can not last on a healthy full node with everyone actually using resources at peak hours.
    I have to be your echo. I agree 110%.

    -Jay
    KnownHost Managed VPS Specialists
    Toll Free: (866)-332-9894
    Fully Managed VPS, Wordpress, Cloud Servers, and Dedicated Servers
      0 Not allowed!

Page 13 of 33 FirstFirst ... 31011121314151623 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •