Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    2

    Arrow

    Hello forum users,

    I have just finished the new design for the
    Unbind Microsystems ENR Web site, check it out
    and tell me what you think,

    if anything is broken, too small, too big, too
    ugly, anything goes..

    http://www.unbindweb.com

    Thank you for your time.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    82
    I really like to into image, what software did you create it in?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Essex Jct, VT, USA
    Posts
    24
    Eep... "unlimited." I'm not going to preach - do a search for "unlimited bandwidth" and read the millions of past messages on the subject.

    The site is nice. I'm assuming $50CDN which is certainly fair. Oh, it does say Canadian. Cool.

    On your en/ pages at the bottom "aviable" should be "available." There it is again on the co-locate page.

    I'm running into script errors with IE4. I'm at work so I can't try them on IE5. Don't think it'll be too much of a problem, but you never know.

    It's a little narrow - you still have plenty of room even at 640x480, and it looks bad at higher resolutions because it's so thin. Perhaps a width of 80% or even 90%.
    VWSpeedRacer
    My sites:
    Watercooled Volkswagens
    Diecast Cars

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    2

    yes, I agree that the table are too thin

    I just made the table wider at 70%,
    more than that would kill the idea.

    the font are not too big or too small;

    Most people run 640x480 or 1800x1600 so
    its hard to find the right one, I find it
    just perfect in 1024. Maybe 1 point bigger.

    BTW: logo made with 3dsm/photoshop.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    0

    Post

    Just a few details..

    Why don't you stretch the header bar with the logo to 70% too? (cut it in three pieces, let the center piece between the font on the left and the green box on the right expand).

    I'd also make the splash pic (1st page) the same shade of green as the logo (or the other way around)

    Wouldn't the "Unbind Web" on the splash pic look better a few more pixels to the left, before the background starts to fade out?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
    Posts
    108

    At 3:32 PM EST

    It looks like your site is down. Did you take it down on purpose?

    Franc
    Franc Nemanic,
    www.nemanic.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    2
    03-20-2001 03:36 PM

    We had DNS problems. Everything is back to normal.

  8. #8
    oh please not unlimited!!! me faints .......

  9. #9

    Hey...

    The front image is stolen from Gary Burges at sh0ck. I suggest you take it down or I will have to report you. Ill keep an eye on you.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    2
    Gary Burges ?

    Can you tell me where I can find his work ?

    A guy named 'wacks' on IRC(efnet) said he made that image
    for me.

    Can you give me some more information on this person ?

    How can it be stolen ? bleh. odd. how lame.

  11. #11

    umm

    check out http://xebex.net/shock.jpg
    look familiar?
    If you need web design, im always available. Go to my web site for a portfolio of work.

    [Edited by xebex hosting on 04-11-2001 at 06:03 PM]

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    2
    DAMMIT DAMMIT, DAMMIT.

    Note to self; do it yourself next time.

    This is the kind of things that pisses me off so bad.
    Someone is going to get a +b next time I see him around.

    Ill email you about this. sigh.

    Thanks for the info.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,269

    Re: yes, I agree that the table are too thin

    Originally posted by unbind
    ...
    Most people run 640x480 or 1800x1600 so
    its hard to find the right one, I find it
    just perfect in 1024. Maybe 1 point bigger.
    Actually most people run 800x600 (is that what you meant when you said 1800x1600?)... see http://websnapshot.mycomputer.com/monitorres.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •