Page 100 of 106 FirstFirst ... 5090979899100101102103 ... LastLast
Results 2,476 to 2,500 of 2642
  1. #2476
    Quote Originally Posted by darkeden View Post
    can you even see tickets? they just put in a new ticket system and my account is no longer there.
    I can't access too.
      0 Not allowed!

  2. #2477
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,616
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackRing View Post
    @Rus

    Please check ticket OPA-423338, I ordered plan 4GB but, I only receive 1Gb. I submited this ticket over 30 hours but it's still not fix

    Regards
    We ahve currently setup people on a standard plan to get people up and running as quickly as possible. If you are having resources issues bump the ticket and someone will set it to at least allow you to work
      0 Not allowed!

  3. #2478
    @Rus
    Hello.
    My VPS is have error: Cannot allocate memory!
    But free-m is used 100Mb!!!
    Ticket ID: DRO-662116 (FSCKVPS)
    And I have 2 VPSes, but now one is recreated and one isn't! Why? Ticket ID: YPA-880673
    Last edited by netvnasia; 06-12-2009 at 10:29 AM.
      0 Not allowed!

  4. #2479
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by a2b2 View Post
    You login should work fine. We've just done an update in Kayako (assuming this is fsck)
    I did a password reset for provide support thank you,.


    when your new hypervm version/clone comes in could I buy licenseing to use it from you on my servers? also you guys are handling the situation great so far. keep it up.
      0 Not allowed!

  5. #2480

    Login

    I can't login to the system ticket secure.fsckvps.com

    Nvm it just worked
    Last edited by ethic; 06-12-2009 at 10:26 AM. Reason: it worked
      0 Not allowed!

  6. #2481
    Quote Originally Posted by a2b2 View Post
    We ahve currently setup people on a standard plan to get people up and running as quickly as possible. If you are having resources issues bump the ticket and someone will set it to at least allow you to work
    I send ticket over 30 hours and none set for me
      0 Not allowed!

  7. #2482
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    321
    Quote Originally Posted by Mechanicum View Post
    Anyone?
    Try using http://EveryDNS.net - I find the interface to be nicer, and it was made by the same guy that made OpenDNS.

    Simply add your domain name, add your VPS IP address as a "A" record, then point your domain to ns1.everydns.net to ns4.everydns.net at your domain registrar. If you need more detailed instructions, just ask
      0 Not allowed!

  8. #2483
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,042
    Quote Originally Posted by sk069 View Post
    i was informed they do not have nodes in los angeles, ca. has anyone else experienced this issue?
    thats not true. my vps is in webnx´s DC in LA.
      0 Not allowed!

  9. #2484
    Does anybody have a list of OSes we can currently request on FsckVPS?
      0 Not allowed!

  10. #2485
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    321
    What's with all the "Cannot allocate memory" errors?? Everyone seems to be getting "fork: Cannot allocate memory" at some point. Are they overloading the host machines with too many VPSes, or is this some sort of odd misconfiguration? My VPS has heaps of free RAM (as reported by free -m), and I still get this error every so often.

    Benchmark results seem to have improved, however I had to run it twice to get a useful result (first time gave a "/home/daniel/unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2/pgms/cleanup.sh: fork: Cannot allocate memory" error >_<
    PHP Code:
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System -- Linux lewis.youareaninja.com 2.6.18-128.1.1.el5.028stab062.3 #1 SMP Sun May 10 18:54:51 MSD 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs            31457280   1378584  30078696   5% /

    Start Benchmark RunSat Jun 13 00:30:43 EST 2009
     00
    :30:43 up 23:31,  1 user,  load average0.071.150.95

    End Benchmark Run
    Sat Jun 13 00:40:19 EST 2009
     00
    :40:19 up 23:41,  1 user,  load average5.723.582.20


                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7 25417353.8      674.6
    Double
    -Precision Whetstone                      83.1     1428.1      171.9
    Execl Throughput                               188.3    10387.3      551.6
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0   213597.0      799.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    84575.0      785.3
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0  1626965.0     1057.7
    Pipe
    -based Context Switching                 15448.6   906120.7      586.5
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6  3150832.5      281.8
    Shell Scripts 
    (8 concurrent)                    44.8     1491.8      333.0
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5  2474147.1      216.2
                                                                     
    =========
         FINAL 
    SCORE                                                     468.1 
    Quote Originally Posted by elvis1 View Post
    thats not true. my vps is in webnx´s DC in LA.
    And mine's in PacificRack in LA.

    Does anybody have a list of OSes we can currently request on FsckVPS?
    I know they offer CentOS and Debian. Not sure of what others are offered, but these are generally the two most popular OSes for servers
    Last edited by Daniel15; 06-12-2009 at 10:41 AM.
      0 Not allowed!

  11. #2486
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Liverpool, England, UK.
    Posts
    2,571
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel15 View Post
    What's with all the "Cannot allocate memory" errors?? Everyone seems to be getting "fork: Cannot allocate memory" at some point. Are they overloading the host machines with too many VPSes
    This is a sneaky suspicion I myself have, ive only had it when updating apache, but ive never had it before. Vladimir assures me that they are not overloading machines, and I trust his word on that, but one has to wonder if they are suddenly moving across 1000+ VPS's onto new nodes, how much hardware that will require, and whether they are being forced into placing more per node than they would usually be comfortable with due to a shortage of hardware?
      0 Not allowed!

  12. #2487
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by darkeden View Post
    just ignore sk069 you guys are doing great
    sk069 has made some very good points, and they shouldn't be neglected. I know Rus said he'd come back to it, but I also think that many others should consider a few things sk069 has said. There's no doubt that getting 4000 VPS back online in this time frame is an overwhelming task, but I question whether there was a meeting of some sort to determine an action plan to take after the hack?

    My observations lead me to believe you guys have tried "the shotgun effects" here in that you may have provisioned thousands of new VPS in a short piriod of time, but many were wrong and would have to be redone anyways, costing far more time than needed. I'm not one to say "you should have", and you certainly know this business far better than I, but regardless of the scale here I believe that the best corse of action would have been to go through each VPS one by one, make the needed changes and inform each customer on a case by case as needed.

    Yes, that approch would have certainly meant that it would take longer to please a large majority of your customers, but at least no one would have felt neglected.

    I'm also wondering why nodes were first said to be restored and a day or so later they were a total loss? Many have posted here saying their VPS were running just fine even up until Wednesday when they suddenly went down and were labled as a total loss?

    What's that all about?? If you guys really do have drives on the old nodes potentially with data why not say "we simply don't have the man power to recover all data at this time, so we can provision new VPS and get back with you once each drive can be inspected"??
      0 Not allowed!

  13. #2488
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    321
    Quote Originally Posted by Xcellweb Matt View Post
    This is a sneaky suspicion I myself have, ive only had it when updating apache, but ive never had it before. Vladimir assures me that they are not overloading machines, and I trust his word on that, but one has to wonder if they are suddenly moving across 1000+ VPS's onto new nodes, how much hardware that will require, and whether they are being forced into placing more per node than they would usually be comfortable with due to a shortage of hardware?
    Is there any program to allocate all the memory, to check that we're indeed getting the RAM they're saying we have? I guess you could malloc() in a loop, but I don't know much C or C++ so wouldn't know how to write an app for it
      0 Not allowed!

  14. #2489
    Quote Originally Posted by netvnasia View Post
    @Rus
    Hello.
    My VPS is have error: Cannot allocate memory!
    But free-m is used 100Mb!!!
    Ticket ID: DRO-662116 (FSCKVPS)
    And I have 2 VPSes, but now one is recreated and one isn't! Why? Ticket ID: YPA-880673
    I've got the error message too. Nomatter what I did via SSH, The server always return "fork: Cannot allocate memory". Even some basic command like "ls", "top", "free" and "reboot" etc.
    Ticket ID:UQK-182533

    I can't do anything now, even can't reboot the VPS.
      0 Not allowed!

  15. #2490
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Liverpool, England, UK.
    Posts
    2,571
    Quote Originally Posted by Xcellweb Matt View Post
    Hi Rus,

    Just been told by Vlada that IP's arnt able to be changed from old servers to new servers, how come this is the case? Im quite disappointed by it, of course ill have to work around it, but some shoutcast customers advertise/exchange their IP address around the internet and a change will affect them directly.

    The IP I really would like to take over is a 94.229.x.x IP address btw, don't know if this has any bearing.

    Thanks in advance!
    In addition to this, can you fix the Media30 support desk, and resolve ticket #CNU-566189, its been outstanding for about 5 days now, but its only a 1 minute job, and it is very important.

    Thanks!
      0 Not allowed!

  16. #2491
    Now my VPS is:

    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    -bash-3.2# free -m
    -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory
    >_<
      0 Not allowed!

  17. #2492
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by sk069 View Post
    check out my old benchmarks:

    look @ how fsckvps was basically spanking the rest. look @ the thread 'vps benchmarks' and see how people were complaining about their vps providers and the dismal #'s based on the numbers below... i bet a lot of them regret choosing fsckvps... i for one am sorry to anyone who my results might have swayed into going towards fsckvps.

    I invite you to check your performance on your VPS and see if it still matches up to the "standard" they were putting everyone else to shame with before they became eligible for the vps provider darwin awards.

    1.) WebProX.com Dedicated Server | 4GBRAM | 2x500GBRAID1 | WebProX.com | $99.95/mo

    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 23
    model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
    stepping : 10
    cpu MHz : 2826.259
    cache size : 6144 KB
    physical id : 0
    siblings : 4
    core id : 0
    cpu cores : 4
    apicid : 0
    initial apicid : 0
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 13
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 lahf_lm
    bogomips : 5656.84
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System -- Linux .com 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 04:02:59 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    /dev/md3 474947840 11863036 438958796 3% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 01:51:16 EDT 2009
    01:51:16 up 5:10, 2 users, load average: 2.74, 2.05, 1.13

    End Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 02:02:32 EDT 2009
    02:02:32 up 5:21, 2 users, load average: 12.88, 6.35, 3.49


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 19910045.1 528.4
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 2078.8 250.2
    Execl Throughput 188.3 11555.7 613.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 324483.0 1214.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 79814.0 741.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 1678496.0 1091.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 1318448.0 853.4
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 6101492.4 545.7
    Process Creation 569.3 46870.5 823.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 3145.4 702.1
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 9563833.8 835.8
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 693.8

    2.) Mosso 512MB CloudServer VPS | $21.95/mo + ???

    processor : 0
    vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
    cpu family : 16
    model : 2
    model name : Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2350 HE
    stepping : 3
    cpu MHz : 1995.000
    cache size : 512 KB
    physical id : 0
    siblings : 1
    core id : 0
    cpu cores : 1
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 5
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good pni cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch
    bogomips : 4005.62
    TLB size : 1024 4K pages
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate

    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System -- Linux .com 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 03:09:12 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    /dev/sda1 19610300 13857488 4756680 75% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 06:23:19 UTC 2009
    06:23:19 up 1 day, 22:48, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.03, 0.01

    End Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 06:33:27 UTC 2009
    06:33:27 up 1 day, 22:58, 1 user, load average: 13.80, 6.00, 2.62


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 14170061.1 376.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 860.4 103.5
    Execl Throughput 188.3 3569.2 189.5
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 109167.0 408.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 30959.0 287.5
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 806588.0 524.4
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 854549.1 76.4
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 204942.3 132.7
    Process Creation 569.3 8837.5 155.2
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 863.7 192.8
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 838155.8 73.2
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 187.6

    3.) FSCKVps - 512MB VPS | $9.95/mo


    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 23
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3350 @ 2.66GHz
    stepping : 7
    cpu MHz : 2660.080
    cache size : 6144 KB
    physical id : 0
    siblings : 4
    core id : 0
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 5322.01
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System -- Linux 666..com 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.028stab060.8 #1 SMP Mon Feb 9 21:44: 50 MSK 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs 20971520 13126340 7845180 63% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 06:24:24 UTC 2009
    06:24:24 up 1 day, 7:54, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

    End Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 06:34:55 UTC 2009
    06:34:55 up 1 day, 8:04, 1 user, load average: 14.88, 6.33, 2.76


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 17046925.7 452.4
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1434.1 172.6
    Execl Throughput 188.3 9386.1 498.5
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 205001.0 767.2
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 65220.0 605.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 1501686.0 976.3
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 3179685.9 284.4
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 908005.6 587.8
    Process Creation 569.3 24924.1 437.8
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 1633.7 364.7
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 2152139.0 188.1
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 428.1

    4.) FSCKVPS - 1024MB VPS | $19.95/mo
    processor : 3
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 23
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3350 @ 2.66GHz
    stepping : 7
    cpu MHz : 2660.080
    cache size : 6144 KB
    physical id : 0
    siblings : 4
    core id : 3
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 5319.24
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System -- Linux 777..com 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.028stab060.8 #1 SMP Mon Feb 9 21:44:50 MSK 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs 52428800 1079688 51349112 3% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 06:34:24 UTC 2009
    06:34:24 up 1 day, 7:49, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01

    End Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 06:45:00 UTC 2009
    06:45:00 up 1 day, 7:59, 1 user, load average: 16.47, 6.59, 2.84


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 8490478.6 225.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1446.5 174.1
    Execl Throughput 188.3 8602.4 456.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 169706.0 635.1
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 61125.0 567.5
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 1214039.0 789.3
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1726799.3 154.4
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 471533.7 305.2
    Process Creation 569.3 21482.0 377.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 1878.7 419.4
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 1777539.4 155.3
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 334.7

    5.) Ubiquity 512MB VPS - $30.00/mo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5345 @ 2.33GHz
    stepping : 7
    cpu MHz : 2327.690
    cache size : 4096 KB
    physical id : 0
    siblings : 4
    core id : 0
    cpu cores : 4
    fdiv_bug : no
    hlt_bug : no
    f00f_bug : no
    coma_bug : no
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4656.94

    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System -- Linux .com 2.6.18-028stab060.8-ent #1 SMP Mon Feb 9 20:49:42 MSK 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
    /dev/vzfs 20971520 6537332 14434188 32% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 06:54:57 UTC 2009
    06:54:57 up 9 days, 8:45, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00

    End Benchmark Run: Sun May 10 07:07:16 UTC 2009
    07:07:16 up 9 days, 8:57, 1 user, load average: 11.47, 5.27, 2.50


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 4604099.3 122.2
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1266.2 152.4
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1751.2 93.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 32255.0 120.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 10328.0 95.9
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 207956.0 135.2
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 177653.4 15.9
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 77921.0 50.4
    Process Creation 569.3 6198.3 108.9
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 465.4 103.9
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 296374.2 25.9
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 77.8
    Come on, you simply didn't understand these results properly, that's not anyone else's fault. That benchmark is very dependent on CPU power, and in most cases you can just check the CPU of the box to estimate the score. 600+ is the normal score for a core 2 quad, when you have exclusive access to it. Your getting such a high score in your test only showed that when you did it other VPSes on the same server didn't swallow too much CPU, but of course there is no guarantee that this is always the case. This is not a dedicated server anyway, remember? On the fsckvps site it was clearly stated that for a 512MB VPS only 600MHz of CPU is guaranteed, and if a core 2 quad (>10GHz total) gets 600, do your math and you know where the line is.
    Last edited by xniteman; 06-12-2009 at 10:56 AM.
      0 Not allowed!

  18. #2493
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by siforek View Post
    I'm also wondering why nodes were first said to be restored and a day or so later they were a total loss? Many have posted here saying their VPS were running just fine even up until Wednesday when they suddenly went down and were labled as a total loss?

    inspected"??
    well when you have over 100+ different dedicated servers to look through,,,,,
      0 Not allowed!

  19. #2494
    Has there been any word on when a control panel such as hypervm will be activated for fsckvps?

    Also is there a way to backup and download our vps without hypervm. If that is possible can you reload a downloaded vps without having to ask fsckvps to do it?
      0 Not allowed!

  20. #2495
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by darkeden View Post
    well when you have over 100+ different dedicated servers to look through,,,,,
    Can you finish that sentence?
      0 Not allowed!

  21. #2496
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Liverpool, England, UK.
    Posts
    2,571
    Here we go:

    Quote Originally Posted by wooreport View Post
    Has there been any word on when a control panel such as hypervm will be activated for fsckvps?
    Quote Originally Posted by a2b2 View Post
    There will be in a few weeks. We've had something in development anyway and we will be bringing this forward
      0 Not allowed!

  22. #2497
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,253
    Quote Originally Posted by wooreport View Post
    Has there been any word on when a control panel such as hypervm will be activated for fsckvps?

    Also is there a way to backup and download our vps without hypervm. If that is possible can you reload a downloaded vps without having to ask fsckvps to do it?
    they already said in a few weeks a custom control panel will come out. you can install webmin and other control panels (free) to do backups
      0 Not allowed!

  23. #2498
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,042
    is there any update on iptables setup?
      0 Not allowed!

  24. #2499
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Xcellweb Matt View Post
    Hi Rus,

    Just been told by Vlada that IP's arnt able to be changed from old servers to new servers, how come this is the case? Im quite disappointed by it, of course ill have to work around it, but some shoutcast customers advertise/exchange their IP address around the internet and a change will affect them directly.

    The IP I really would like to take over is a 94.229.x.x IP address btw, don't know if this has any bearing.

    Thanks in advance!
    The 94.229.x.x is UK servers and your are on BlueConnex transit

    Rus
      0 Not allowed!

  25. #2500
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Xcellweb Matt View Post
    This is a sneaky suspicion I myself have, ive only had it when updating apache, but ive never had it before. Vladimir assures me that they are not overloading machines, and I trust his word on that, but one has to wonder if they are suddenly moving across 1000+ VPS's onto new nodes, how much hardware that will require, and whether they are being forced into placing more per node than they would usually be comfortable with due to a shortage of hardware?
    We've had 30 new UK severs deployed and I'm guessing your are low on Kmemesize. If so drop in a ticket (probably the same for performance issues)
      0 Not allowed!

Page 100 of 106 FirstFirst ... 5090979899100101102103 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •