Web Hosting Talk : Advertising Forums : Community Reviews : Web Site Reviews : Linked Ajax stopped working?

[Mechphisto]

Hi. This isn't a review request but a call for help. But since the rules say I have to go here if I'm linking to a site....

First, if anyone has a good, active Ajax forum they can recommend, I'd really appreciate it! (I went to the Usenet group comp.lang.javascript first, but they seem overrun by spammers.)

OK, I've a Web page I put together which uses javascript/Google API Ajax to return to the page a display of files the user uploads. It used to work great, and then today I noticed it's no longer working.
Could something have changed with the .js files it's linking to?

It's at
http://www.girlscoutsmoheartland.org...mageupload.php

The files still upload to the server just fine, but it's no longer displaying onto the page the result of the browse...upload.

I Googled for the files, but as far as I can tell I'm linking to the latest ones:

<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.2/jquery.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.7.2/jquery-ui.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.7.2/themes/ui-darkness/jquery-ui.css" type="text/css" media="all" />

so, maybe that's not the issue...but the fact it worked great, no one on this end touched it, and now it doesn't work, leads me to think it's something on the linked .js end.

I appreciate any help or suggestions!
Liam

[Mechphisto]

Holy...
OK, playing around, just trying different things, I took out the
#example. from all the javascript lines. They didn't seem to make
sense being there as they weren't matching the <p> tags that way. And,
now it works again!
Very perplexing! When I put this page together weeks ago and it
worked, that would mean I would have had to have done the same thing
then. It makes no sense as to how it could have possibly reverted
back. Especially since that page had a LOT of changes made to it AFTER
that core functionality was completed weeks ago, and all THOSE changes
are still intact. So it's not a matter of somehow an older copy of the
page getting reuploaded... that script section itself would have had
to have been intentionally restored to an earlier version with the
rest of the page untouched.
It makes no sense to me at all.
I'd delete this thread if I could find a way to do so... sorry to bother.
Liam