hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Colocation and Data Centers : IP Transit Carrier Rating
Reply

Forum Jump

IP Transit Carrier Rating

View Poll Results: Who's your favorite IP Transit Provider?
Global Crossing [AS3549] 11 13.92%
Level 3 Communications [AS3356] 44 55.70%
Deutsche Telekom AG [3320] 3 3.80%
Inteliquent (fka Tinet/Tiscali International Network) [AS3257] 13 16.46%
Verizon Business (fka UUNET) [AS701] 4 5.06%
Sprint [AS1239] 3 3.80%
TeliaSonera International Carrier [AS1299] 12 15.19%
NTT Communications [AS2914] 7 8.86%
Tata Communications [AS6453] 4 5.06%
Cogent Communications [AS174] 16 20.25%
AboveNet [AS6461] 12 15.19%
Hurricane Electric [AS6939] 18 22.78%
Cable and Wireless [AS1273] 1 1.27%
nLayer [AS4436] 25 31.65%
Interoute [AS8928] 2 2.53%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Post New Thread In Colocation and Data Centers Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old
Industry Grandfather
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsylvania, US
Posts: 5,237
Where is PCCW on the list?...they rock.
.
.

__________________
SmartHost, LLC - The Intelligent Hosting Solution! - Multiple US Locations!
http://www.smarthost.net - sales@smarthost.net - Resale/Affiliate Programs
Cloud Hosting - VPS Hosting - Dedicated Servers - Flux Capacitors

Sponsored Links
  #17  
Old
Junior Guru Wannabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Storrs, CT
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlZimmer View Post
From a purely technical angle, Level3 has unsurpassed route miles, an unsurpassed number of POPs, an unsurpassed number of customer/direct routes (originating over 40% of routes, the only one even close is Global Crossing). Simply no one can compare to the amount of data L3 is handling, pure and simple.
No disagreement here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlZimmer View Post
I really don't even see how you can say on a strictly technical level someone like nLayer can even compare. nLayer leases individual pairs of fiber from other parties, Level3 constructs brand new low latency routes, globally. If you're looking for the absolute lowest latency between all global financial markets, you'd be hard pressed to find a single network better than Level3. If you're looking at a widely distributed network of facilities/offices, you'd be hard pressed to find a better network than Level3.
I'm talking about Level(3)'s transit here, not their fiber network. Their transit is not MPLS-enabled, meaning if there is a failure which causes packet loss or very high latency, it will be there quite awhile before one of the slower protocols can get it out of the way. No matter how much presence you have, this is a problem. If a financial network decided to use Level(3), they'd no doubt get their VPN or virtual private line services which leverage MPLS fast reroute capabilities to change what would be 50% packet-loss into 2ms of extra latency to route around a dead/overloaded router.

MPLS is no silver bullet, but I consider it a foundational principle of modern IP transit networks, and Level(3)'s transit is lacking it.

__________________
Darius Jahandarie

  #18  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 788
I honestly don't get why people recommend AboveNet... their routing isn't so good. I've been routed through London to reach Ashburn... I live 30 miles from NYC. That's just an example. I'm hesistant to buy from providers who use AboveNet because their network is really that horrible. I'd much rather have HE or Cogent or even Bandcon than AboveNet.

__________________
My personal blog -- rubiverse.net

Sponsored Links
  #19  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by djahandarie View Post
No disagreement here.



I'm talking about Level(3)'s transit here, not their fiber network. Their transit is not MPLS-enabled, meaning if there is a failure which causes packet loss or very high latency, it will be there quite awhile before one of the slower protocols can get it out of the way. No matter how much presence you have, this is a problem. If a financial network decided to use Level(3), they'd no doubt get their VPN or virtual private line services which leverage MPLS fast reroute capabilities to change what would be 50% packet-loss into 2ms of extra latency to route around a dead/overloaded router.

MPLS is no silver bullet, but I consider it a foundational principle of modern IP transit networks, and Level(3)'s transit is lacking it.
Interesting input regarding the L3 transit network, is that setup consistent throughout their network?

__________________
-•- PingBin.com -•- Trace Route Database -•-

  #20  
Old
Master of the Truth
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by flam316 View Post
I honestly don't get why people recommend AboveNet... their routing isn't so good. I've been routed through London to reach Ashburn... I live 30 miles from NYC. That's just an example. I'm hesistant to buy from providers who use AboveNet because their network is really that horrible. I'd much rather have HE or Cogent or even Bandcon than AboveNet.
Abovenet has its uses, just like HE and Cogent have their uses. There is no silver bullet.

We have Abovenet part of our mix and we have a fantastic network according to our customers.

__________________
Yellow Fiber Networks
http://www.yellowfiber.net : Managed Solutions - Colocation - Network Services IPv4/IPv6
Ashburn/Denver/NYC/Dallas/Chicago Markets Served zak@yellowfiber.net

  #21  
Old
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 143
Something that GlobalCrossing and Inteliquent (Tinet) have in common is the very few hops it takes to reach two very far locations when looking at traceroute results. Rarely will it take more than two hops to travel between two edges.

Looking at the market offering, there are a very few provider out there who are 100% Ethernet and truly “next-generation”. Many of the big players mix old and new technologies together, though they have a real depth of geographical reach.

I think that the relevant aspects of a Tier 1 are:

1) The footprint and global reach
2) The traffic engineering (link oversubscription, capacity, best paths, performance, packet loss, stability, number of planned/unplanned outages)
3) The amount of prefixes “on-net” they announce, the more the better

Finally, considering the success of Level(3) in this poll, there are some facts I’d like to share with you. I’ve continuously heard ramblings about Level(3) being partially owned by the US Govt. / Army.

Do we know who are the major investors of Level(3)? Does the US gov. have any stake in the company?

  #22  
Old
Randy
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ashburn VA, San Diego CA
Posts: 4,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dualism View Post
Do we know who are the major investors of Level(3)? Does the US gov. have any stake in the company?
They do alot of mil contracts for hardware mostly defense stuff. Totally separate part of the company not related to the IP services.

__________________
Fast Serv Networks, LLC | AS29889 | Fully Managed Cloud, Streaming, Dedicated Servers, Colo by-the-U
Ashburn VA + San Diego CA Datacenters


  #23  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 1,081
Can anybody share their experiences with Peer1? I know they're not Tier-1, but I'm curious to see what people have to say about them.

__________________
Right Servers Inc. - Fully Managed Cloud Servers in Canada
High- Availability Cloud | cPanel/WHM | Softaculous | Idera Backups | Bitcoin & Litecoin Accepted

  #24  
Old
Junior Guru Wannabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Storrs, CT
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTom View Post
Interesting input regarding the L3 transit network, is that setup consistent throughout their network?
Yes, they do not run MPLS for any of their transit. (It's technically possible they could run some without anyone noticing, but at the very least they aren't using it in any way that benefits users.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dualism View Post
Something that GlobalCrossing and Inteliquent (Tinet) have in common is the very few hops it takes to reach two very far locations when looking at traceroute results. Rarely will it take more than two hops to travel between two edges.
That's MPLS. There are a number of hops there which you are simply not seeing (and I'd certainly hope they're not running a full mesh).

When you have a label-switched path in MPLS, none of the intermediate routers need to worry about, well, routing. All they do is some manipulation on the MPLS data and forward it to the predetermined next-hop.

This allows network providers to entirely disable TTL decrementing and remove the routing tables from their core routers, creating an MPLS-only core.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedicatedone View Post
Can anybody share their experiences with Peer1? I know they're not Tier-1, but I'm curious to see what people have to say about them.
My experience with them is limited, but so far it's been good, haven't noticed any serious issues.

__________________
Darius Jahandarie


Last edited by djahandarie; 04-16-2012 at 07:24 PM.
  #25  
Old
THE Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dualism View Post
Finally, considering the success of Level(3) in this poll, there are some facts I’d like to share with you. I’ve continuously heard ramblings about Level(3) being partially owned by the US Govt. / Army.

Do we know who are the major investors of Level(3)? Does the US gov. have any stake in the company?
They're a publicly traded company, their largest shareholders and ownership structure is publicly available. Here is a rundown of some of the biggest shareholders: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=LVLT+Major+Holders

__________________
Karl Zimmerman - Steadfast: Managed Dedicated Servers and Premium Colocation
karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
Now Open in New Jersey! - Contact us for New Jersey colocation or dedicated servers

  #26  
Old
Web Hosting Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 515
Peer1 is my choice #1, except for the price

Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Per megabit transit costs with Comcast ? (Subtitle: another $1/MB carrier?) jcy1978 Colocation and Data Centers 9 01-05-2010 12:40 PM
BandCon Transit, Level 3 Transit and Global Crossing..... danski Colo Hosting Offers 1 05-03-2009 05:01 AM
Level (3) IP Transit, Qwest IP Transit and Limelight Streaming--- danski Dedicated Hosting Offers 0 01-04-2007 12:57 PM
Newbie question on ip-transit/carrier/peering Sof_Reverend Colocation and Data Centers 1 08-30-2004 10:13 AM
Becoming a Carrier Gibraltar Hosting Security and Technology 4 04-13-2002 02:30 PM

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
Purevoltage Enterprises Inc. Listing 2014-12-10 12:48:50
Oracle to Buy Carrier SDN Startup Corente Web Hosting News 2014-01-07 17:51:44
Pacnet Further Expands Service Footprint in India with PoPs Web Hosting News 2013-07-16 17:08:18
Sago Networks Acquires Web Host Razor Servers Web Hosting News 2013-06-18 15:14:15
Digital Realty Trust Names VP of Connectivity & Carrier Operations Web Hosting News 2013-01-15 17:00:19


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
WHT Host Brief Email:

We respect your privacy. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.

Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:
WHT Membership
WHT Membership



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?