Results 1 to 24 of 24
-
06-03-2011, 11:06 AM #1Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 19
Wiredtree Vs Servint - Dedicated Server Configuration Options
Hey experts! Your thoughts on which server option below is best will be appreciated.
I have quotes from Servint and Wiredtree for fully managed NON-Virtuozzo dedicated servers with exactly SAME COST but with different configuration. The server will be used to host 200 small-medium domains with many (strictly-no-spam) mail accounts and a few small databases.
Common things offered by both are:
Quad Core Xeon® X3440 Processor
4 x 2.4 GHz Hyperthreaded Cores
8 MB L3 Cache, 1333 MHz FSB
4 GB 1333MHz DDR3 ECC Memory
Differences are:
A) Disks and Raid controller :-
SERVINT
2 x 146 GB "10K" SAS HDD in Hardware RAID 1
SAS i6R SAS internal RAID adapter PCIe - 256 MB cache
WIREDTREE
2x147GB "15K" RPM SAS 16MB Cache
Adaptec 5405 PCIe - 1.2GHZ Dual Core - 256MB Cache
Battery Backup Unit (BBU) for Raid 1
B) Backup :-
SERVINT
EITHER - Backup Drive 500GB 7.2k RPM SATAII 16MB Cache
"OR" - 50GB R1soft backup within the DC itself
WIREDTREE
- Backup Drive 500GB 7.2k RPM SATAII 16MB Cache
"AND" - 50 GB remote FTP backup space
Wiredtree also offers Servershield hardening for free.
Both are reputed for support and I know both are good companies. My Queries are:
1. Since cost is exactly same, which server above is the clear winner and why?
2. Have never felt the need to restore a single file, just want the backup incase of a crash. Is just a backup drive not enough?
3. In the Wiredtree backups, can both backup drive and Remote FTP backup be useful on a cPanel server? If not should I save $25 monthly and let go of remote backup since local allows quicker restore?
4. Even with BBU, if battery fails there is a very very small data risk if write caching is enabled. Should I save $20 monthly on Wiredtree server by avoiding the Battery Backup Unit for RAID1 and disable write-caching?
5. From my location, average ping time for Servint is 310ms and Wiredtree is 330ms. Will 20ms be a perceptible difference for websites and emails?
Many thanks in advance for your advice.Last edited by aarkay777; 06-03-2011 at 11:09 AM.
-
06-03-2011, 01:51 PM #2Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Cincinnati
- Posts
- 1,585
The Servint setup is a dell 6ir sas controller, no write cache. You need to find out if the 5405 card from wiredtree has write cache and if it has the BBU.
Wiredtree has had a lot of network issues/outages the past 2 months, not sure whats causing that.
I've seen countless threads about it. Normally I'd say wiredtree hands down comparing the 2.'Ripcord'ing is the only way!
-
06-03-2011, 03:28 PM #3Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 657
No, actually we haven't had any network issues or outages in the last 2 months. You must be confusing us with someone else. We've made a number of large network upgrades in the past two months, but haven't suffered any outages whatsoever.
The Adaptec 5405 has 512MB cache and we offer the optional BBU on our site as well.█ Zac Cogswell / CEI
█ Formerly known as WiredTree Zac
-
06-03-2011, 05:51 PM #4Divided by Zero
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 1,219
From my personal experience with both providers, I would choose WiredTree. Also I would always prefer 15k SAS drives compared to 10k HDDs.
-
06-04-2011, 04:52 AM #5Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 19
1) As mentioned in my original post, the Wiredtree server has write cache and BBU. Hence, I had asked this above:-
"4. Even with BBU, if battery fails there is a very very small data risk if write caching is enabled. Should I save $20 monthly on Wiredtree server by avoiding the Battery Backup Unit for RAID1 and disable write-caching?"
2) I researched before posting here but could not find any recent outage threads for Wiredtree or Servint. Do you have links or was it another company you were mistakenly referring to?Last edited by aarkay777; 06-04-2011 at 04:59 AM.
-
06-04-2011, 11:51 AM #6Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 10,710
Write caching can improve performance quite a lot. It is worth the extra cost for the BBU.
-
06-06-2011, 05:48 AM #7Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 19
-
06-07-2011, 01:50 PM #8Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 19
I seem to be the only one having fun with my own thread.
So does everyone recommend taking the small risk of write caching with a BBU in place?
Also, average ping time for Servint is 310ms and Wiredtree is 330ms from my location. Will 20ms be a perceptible difference for websites and emails?
-
06-07-2011, 05:18 PM #9Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- Kansas City, Missouri
- Posts
- 462
Hello,
Write cache is a must for systems utilizing database engines like MySQL. Cache memory is always faster than disk. BBU keeps that cache persistent if power is lost. When the system is rebooted, cache is replayed to disk and you have consistency.
Generally lower latency is better. 300ms will be very different than 45-50ms but I am not sure if 20ms will make or break the deal for you. Are you outside the country? That is a pretty high ping time. You may want to investigate options geographically closer to your location to increase response time.
Good luck!=> • Admo.net Managed Hosting •
=> Managed Hosting • Dedicated Servers • Colocation
=> Dark Fiber Access to 1102 Grand, Multiple Public Providers
=> Over •Sixteen• Years of Service
-
06-08-2011, 12:49 PM #10Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 19
I am in India but all my servers are in USA because there are not equally good hosts and connections here as yet. Thanks for letting me know that 20ms will not make much of a difference.
From what I have heard here so far, Wiredtree server looks like a clear winner at the same cost.
What about backups. With Raid1 already there, is an extra disk for backup not enough? Since I do not need to restore a single file do I really need R1soft instead of a backup disk?
-
06-09-2011, 08:01 PM #11Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 39
I think he's referring to your extended downtime in Dec. and Jan., not to mention the DDoS attacks on Grove in Jan.
I'm still trying to find the time to write a review of my migration from WiredTree to ServInt but I couldn't be happier. Their Managed Migration was simply magnificent.
-
06-09-2011, 08:23 PM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 657
We did have a power issue which affected a small number of clients in a specific area of our datacenter 6-7 months ago, which was addressed immediately by our on-site staff. There were changes made to the power infrastructure in the datacenter to prevent that from happening again and everything has been 100% rock solid since then. The DDOS you are referring too was against our web site and Grove, not any client sites, so the impact was non-existent or minimal for nearly all of our clients.
In any event, glad to hear you are happy again.█ Zac Cogswell / CEI
█ Formerly known as WiredTree Zac
-
06-09-2011, 09:24 PM #13Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 39
I would beg to differ it was a one time thing with a "small number of clients":
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1005063
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1014815
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1021397
Stats in the last thread from UnderHost:
WiredTree from pingdom:
February 2011
Uptime (%): 94.55% Downtime (d, h, m) : 13 h, 38 m
January 2011
Uptime (%): 95.4% Downtime (d, h, m) : 1 d, 10 h, 14 m
December 2010
Uptime (%): 99.38% Downtime (d, h, m) : 48 m
And I was confusing this DDOS:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=728315
with this one in January.
But it wasn't the downtime that motivated me to change vendors, it was the arbitrary changing of root passwords without notifying your customers:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1019174
That was unforgivable, imo.
In any event, glad to hear you are happy again.
-
06-09-2011, 09:50 PM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 657
I'm not going to argue with you since you seem to have an axe to grind, however I have all the technical data in front of me (and I was there physically at the time) to say with 100% accuracy it was a small subset of clients we host. Sure, there are tons of posts in those threads (although many of the posts are by accounts created to complain in the thread and have never posted again...) but we have many, many times more clients than that.
You are more than welcome to check our Hyperspin reports: http://www.hyperspin.com/en/ranking.php?type=3 where we have 99.997% uptime over 1020 days for our network.
We're not immune to issues, nor are any other hosts, including your current one who has had a number of power/network issues as well since you have been with them. The test is how a host reacts to the issues, and we have done so properly and completely. That is why the only threads you find are half a year old.█ Zac Cogswell / CEI
█ Formerly known as WiredTree Zac
-
06-10-2011, 01:44 AM #15CISSP-ISSMP, CISA
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Seattle
- Posts
- 5,525
My problem with Hyperspin is the reliability of those reports. Last I checked, it was actually possible to setup monitors pointing to 127.0.0.1 and appear to have 100.00% uptime.
Similarly, if you want to smear a competitor you can just point at random sites having poor uptime and mark them as being with that competitor.
-
06-10-2011, 10:55 AM #16Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 19
Can anyone post similar outage threads in the last one year and stats (from pingdom etc.) for Servint as well, so that a comparison can be made?
-
06-10-2011, 02:16 PM #17Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Posts
- 176
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/search...rchid=32505361
No one is immune from down time.
For example Softlayer had a bad power outage several years ago. And Colo4 Dallis was knocked offline by a DDoS attack some time ago. Because one of their links was only GigE. So ya people go down its a fact it happens.
-
06-10-2011, 04:32 PM #18Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 657
-
06-11-2011, 02:32 AM #19Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 19
-
06-11-2011, 01:45 PM #20Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Posts
- 176
Sorry I thought that would work.
The point I was trying to make is, go to advanced search put in any providers name and search in the outages forum. Almost all hosts who have been around a while will have threads there. Even more so for those who are selling out of their own DC. Because they are the upstream to more users. So of course those folks are going to get more scrutiny.
Whats funny is Softlayer has a lot of threads. But yet no one seems to find that a problem. Servint also has several threads as do Knowhost, and many many other hosts. But this doesn't make any of them them a bad host. Heck most people consider the hosts I listed to be very good.
I think we all need to be realistic about up time. I would argue the quality of a host comes out during and after problems such as down time.
-
06-12-2011, 08:43 PM #21Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 39
No axe to grind, just stating facts. But I find it difficult to believe that you would fly in the VP of CoreSite if it was such a "small subset of the clients we host".
You are more than welcome to check our Hyperspin reports: http://www.hyperspin.com/en/ranking.php?type=3 where we have 99.997% uptime over 1020 days for our network.
December 2010
Uptime (%): 99.38% Downtime (d, h, m) : 48 m
January 2011
Uptime (%): 95.4% Downtime (d, h, m) : 1 d, 10 h, 14 m
February 2011
Uptime (%): 94.55% Downtime (d, h, m) : 13 h, 38 m
We're not immune to issues, nor are any other hosts, including your current one who has had a number of power/network issues as well since you have been with them. The test is how a host reacts to the issues, and we have done so properly and completely. That is why the only threads you find are half a year old.
However, I would disagree that your company reacted "properly and completely". Doing scheduled, non-emergent system/network maintenance during normal business hours in the U.S. is about as far from "best practice" as you can get. On the west coast of the U.S., people are still working at 7:00PM CST. And guess what happens when "routine maintenance" goes awry? My site, along with all of my client sites, go down when people are actually using them.
And I won't even get into how you could allow a 3-party vendor to gain access to all usernames and passwords for the Grove system, which contains your customers credit card information. This was totally unrelated to the thread I mentioned above where root passwords were changed without notifying your customers, which you conveniently didn't respond to.
We'll just have to agree to disagree on how well your company responded to three separate instances of downtime in a three month period. As I said in one of my posts during the outage:
"How you and your company respond to these recent challenges will determine just how effective a manager you are... and whether I'll stay with you or not. I'm _so_ much in your corner and I wish you the very best of luck during this transition period."
You quite obviously think your company responded perfectly and I, quite obviously, disagree.
Which is why I and many, many others from that time period are no longer your customers.
-
06-12-2011, 09:36 PM #22Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 657
Why wouldn't they? They are just as concerned about uptime as we are - there was an issue they were taking seriously and they dealt with it that way. Pretty simple. We aren't the only tenants in the building, and others had issues, including internal CoreSite equipment, which you probably never gave thought to.
I don't have to check Hyperspin, I was a customer of your company during the period I was talking about. My problem was with the Dec., Jan., Feb. time frame, when this was your company's record:
However, I would disagree that your company reacted "properly and completely". Doing scheduled, non-emergent system/network maintenance during normal business hours in the U.S. is about as far from "best practice" as you can get. On the west coast of the U.S., people are still working at 7:00PM CST. And guess what happens when "routine maintenance" goes awry? My site, along with all of my client sites, go down when people are actually using them.
And I won't even get into how you could allow a 3-party vendor to gain access to all usernames and passwords for the Grove system, which contains your customers credit card information. This was totally unrelated to the thread I mentioned above where root passwords were changed without notifying your customers, which you conveniently didn't respond to.█ Zac Cogswell / CEI
█ Formerly known as WiredTree Zac
-
06-12-2011, 10:16 PM #23Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Cincinnati
- Posts
- 1,585
-
06-12-2011, 10:29 PM #24Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 657
We have multiple footprints in 427 S LaSalle (CoreSite) in downtown Chicago. We own and operate our own network - AS19066 with 80Gbps connectivity from 4 tier-1 (L3, GBLX, Savvis, NTT) providers running primarily on the new Brocade MLXe platform. The network upgrades were recently completed, so our web site is a bit of of date and is scheduled to be updated.
█ Zac Cogswell / CEI
█ Formerly known as WiredTree Zac
Similar Threads
-
Between KH, Servint and Wiredtree, I am 99% decided on Wiredtree but...
By coume in forum VPS HostingReplies: 15Last Post: 03-21-2010, 07:18 PM -
ServInt / Knownhost / Wiredtree
By tender_heart in forum VPS HostingReplies: 24Last Post: 12-21-2009, 02:40 AM -
Wiredtree OR Servint?
By meerk in forum VPS HostingReplies: 26Last Post: 10-19-2009, 04:21 PM -
WiredTree --> Servint?
By reloaded in forum VPS HostingReplies: 43Last Post: 04-10-2009, 02:39 PM -
ServInt vs WiredTree
By arcturus in forum VPS HostingReplies: 4Last Post: 08-28-2008, 10:26 AM