Results 1 to 25 of 33
-
11-19-2002, 02:10 PM #1Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Toronto Canada
- Posts
- 347
This is good turn your sound up lol
For a great new forum please click on my weblink.
ALLWAYS LOOKING FOR MEMBERS
VISIT ME AT
http://www.jmdsforum.com
-
11-19-2002, 02:16 PM #2Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,598
That's .... disturbing.
-
11-19-2002, 02:34 PM #3Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Chandler, Arizona
- Posts
- 2,564
lamo funny very funny
-Robert Norton
www.SophMedia.com
-
11-19-2002, 02:41 PM #4Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Downunder..
- Posts
- 2,612
Right very funny..
I don't see how you can see this as very funny, bombing another country killing innocent people..
Two words..
"Typical Americans".
-
11-19-2002, 02:45 PM #5Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Chandler, Arizona
- Posts
- 2,564
killing inocent people? haha your funny..
-Robert Norton
www.SophMedia.com
-
11-19-2002, 02:47 PM #6Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Downunder..
- Posts
- 2,612
Oh, so they are not innocent? is that what your saying?
How would you like it if i posted some flash with bin laden, "lets bomb bush & the U.S"?
-
11-19-2002, 02:50 PM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Chandler, Arizona
- Posts
- 2,564
I'd say "your an idiot" plain and simple...btw i don't know if you noticed this or maybe I wasn't the only one? but it said "its time to bomb saddam" last time i checked saddam is only one person, and we by now should know he's not innocent...
-Robert Norton
www.SophMedia.com
-
11-19-2002, 02:51 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Downunder..
- Posts
- 2,612
Hmm, bombing saddam would mean bombing the country hes based in, wouldnt it? You can't exactly bomb one person, now can you?
-
11-19-2002, 02:56 PM #9Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Chandler, Arizona
- Posts
- 2,564
sure you can...its called strategic bombing..
-Robert Norton
www.SophMedia.com
-
11-19-2002, 02:57 PM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Downunder..
- Posts
- 2,612
Right..
Like the bombing in afghanistan? Blew a wedding apart, killed a few hundred.. right strategic bombing..
want me to go on?
Blah, bunch of war mongers.
-
11-19-2002, 03:00 PM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 2,027
http://www.madblast.com/view.cfm?typ...h&display=1627
Warning: bad languageGone.
-
11-19-2002, 03:02 PM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Downunder..
- Posts
- 2,612
Hahaha, i wouldnt be surprised at saddam laughing at these, he wants attention and you sure are giving it to him..
and what makes it more funny, is your so desperate to get back at him you need these "flash" movies, oh please.. how sad
-
11-19-2002, 03:09 PM #13Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Downunder..
- Posts
- 2,612
Since everyone is sharing images, flash ect, i might aswell
-
11-19-2002, 03:14 PM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Chandler, Arizona
- Posts
- 2,564
we have a reason...
-Robert Norton
www.SophMedia.com
-
11-19-2002, 03:14 PM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Downunder..
- Posts
- 2,612
And enlighten me what that may be?
-
11-19-2002, 03:59 PM #16Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 420
Originally posted by edude
And enlighten me what that may be?
The point of war would be to secure any weapons they have. Since they have agreed to let UN inspectors back in, we do not have to go to war. If we did nothing about it and they launched attacks on other nations (with the small possibility of the United States as a target) the results would be many more casualties than would be if we fought them and took the weapons ourselves. The United States does not go in and completely blow up Iraq or even bomb civilian structures, bombs would only be directed at military installations.Last edited by mindboggle; 11-19-2002 at 04:05 PM.
-
11-19-2002, 05:47 PM #17Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Westbury, LI NY
- Posts
- 1,705
Originally posted by edude
And enlighten me what that may be?
http://www.daily-journal.com/content/?id=16332
which intrestingly enough says:
The administration gamely answers that the United States always reserves the right to make its own judgment and act in its own defense.
as Iraq upped the ante by firing once again on U.S. and British warplanes over a "no-fly" zone.
The White House says the Iraqis are in "material breach" of U.N. resolutions simply by firing on the planes - in other words, that Iraq is already asking for war.
Europeans are tons of fun. Lets take a look at your history for a minute.
First there is the fact that at a conference in Munich in 1938 the leaders of Italy, France, and England agreed to give land to Hitler as long as he promises not to attack other areas. That was a real smart move. What did Hitler do shortly there after? He attacked other areas.
Proof that Europe has been slow to act in the face of a clear and repesent danger to the world and would rather just sign treaties saying please don't hurt us, just go bother anyone else, we won't defend them. Way to go Europe!
What happpens a year later? Britain and France declare war as Hitler walks into Paris. Some good that little treaty did.
Europe has always been slow to act on such things like this. They were with Hitler they are with Saddam.
US: This guy has nukes and is trying to use them on us, we decalre war!
EU: No you don't, not so fast, lets sit and argue about it for a few years, draw up resoltuions, and complain how you are barbarians.
US: But he forgot to fill out the UN approval form for nukes.
EU: Where's our army?!? Their all dead men!
When will Europe learn, after Hitler Jr has taken half the continent and is bombing England? Than the barbarian Americans and their uncivilized manners will be put up with, right?
please
Way to take two jokes of political staire and turn it into a political debate, but now you got it.
-
11-19-2002, 05:51 PM #18
Edude is it just me or do you just stick your foot in the door everywhere you can to stirr up things?
KnownHost Managed Services Specialists
Fully Managed WebSite Hosting
Offering WordPress, Shared, Reseller, VPS, KVM, WordPress, Dedicated servers and more!
Contact us: sales@knownhost.com or by phone 1-866-332-9894
-
11-19-2002, 06:02 PM #19Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Westbury, LI NY
- Posts
- 1,705
Originally posted by DanielP
Edude is it just me or do you just stick your foot in the door everywhere you can to stirr up things?
-
11-19-2002, 07:51 PM #20Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Chandler, Arizona
- Posts
- 2,564
Originally posted by DanielP
Edude is it just me or do you just stick your foot in the door everywhere you can to stirr up things?-Robert Norton
www.SophMedia.com
-
11-19-2002, 10:40 PM #21Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 1,991
Originally posted by mindboggle
To ensure that Iraq is not violating the 1991 cease treaty in which they agreed to disarm. Since they kicked out UN inspectors, the United States had to get on their case because of the possibility that they are harboring chemical, biological and/or nuclear weapons/materials.
The point of war would be to secure any weapons they have. Since they have agreed to let UN inspectors back in, we do not have to go to war. If we did nothing about it and they launched attacks on other nations (with the small possibility of the United States as a target) the results would be many more casualties than would be if we fought them and took the weapons ourselves. The United States does not go in and completely blow up Iraq or even bomb civilian structures, bombs would only be directed at military installations.
Hmmh, I guess only Iraq has these weapons? If the US has the right, and other US allies have the right to house weapons of mass destruction, why shouldn't Iraq have this same right?
-
11-19-2002, 11:10 PM #22Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Orlando, FL
- Posts
- 12,207
Here's what the president has to say about this thread....
-
11-19-2002, 11:20 PM #23Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Chandler, Arizona
- Posts
- 2,564
Originally posted by iamdave
I agree with edude. How can you bomb Sadaam without injuring innocent people. Even with "strategic bombing" is it possible to just kill one person?
Hmmh, I guess only Iraq has these weapons? If the US has the right, and other US allies have the right to house weapons of mass destruction, why shouldn't Iraq have this same right?
Our good friend Clinton did us a favor back in 92, hah right. The CIA had a operative in Iraq, how was about to assignate Saddam. Well our good o' boy, decided that he thought this wasn't right. He canceled the operation, and then nailed him for "murder for hire". Saddam would be six feet under if it wasn't for Clinton. Now the reason the USA doesn't want the Iraqi's (Specifically Saddam) to have biological/chemical/nuclear warfare is because of the fact that he has threatined his neighboring countries, he's made threats against the USA. I'm assuming that EDude and IAmDave believe that we're not aloud to protect ourselves. I don't want to get into an argument about the whole 9/11 thing and the FBI/CIA knowing about WTC. But by now don't you think we've learned to be prepared?-Robert Norton
www.SophMedia.com
-
11-19-2002, 11:20 PM #24Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 363
oh dear god...this is just too much
-
11-19-2002, 11:56 PM #25Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 1,991
Originally posted by interactive
Our good friend Clinton did us a favor back in 92, hah right. The CIA had a operative in Iraq, how was about to assignate Saddam. Well our good o' boy, decided that he thought this wasn't right. He canceled the operation, and then nailed him for "murder for hire". Saddam would be six feet under if it wasn't for Clinton. Now the reason the USA doesn't want the Iraqi's (Specifically Saddam) to have biological/chemical/nuclear warfare is because of the fact that he has threatined his neighboring countries, he's made threats against the USA. I'm assuming that EDude and IAmDave believe that we're not aloud to protect ourselves. I don't want to get into an argument about the whole 9/11 thing and the FBI/CIA knowing about WTC. But by now don't you think we've learned to be prepared?