Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1

    * Cloud servers vs Redundant cluster

    Suppose I want to compare cloud vps to a redundant cluster setup. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    Redundant cluster
    +
    Data privacy
    Full control on software/hardware
    True redundancy and virtually zero downtime
    Better performance with premium hardware

    -
    Expensive
    Major hardware crash on multiple servers would result in a lot of downtime
    Complex and long to deploy


    Cloud servers (VPS)

    +
    Relatively cheap
    Little to zero downtime with a proper failover installed
    Scalable
    Instant or fast deployment

    -
    Performance capped, generally slower than a premium cluster
    Data privacy
    No zero downtime possible

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,030
    Why not.. a Cluster on Cloud? You can still have all your positives, but almost all your negatives are gone.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,708
    Cloudweb is correct, there are many providers that give geographic redundancy and you can put loadbalancing and failover based protocols in place.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    UrNode - Virtual Solutions
    http://www.UrNode.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,030
    Well I didn't say anything about georedundancy as that is not Cloud or Cluster related, but yes you could add that to the mix as well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    938
    It starts to get a bit muddled based on the level of hardware ownership. For the sake of argument, I'll assume by cloud servers, you mean a public service and not for instance getting AppLogic installed on your cluster, turning it into a private cloud.

    Redundant cluster (vs public cloud)
    +
    Data privacy - doable on public cloud too. Sometimes called virtual private clouds.

    Full control on software/hardware - true. But see above for hybrid/private clouds.

    True redundancy and virtually zero downtime - Its nice to own the router.

    Better performance with premium hardware - More efficient yes since you're not paying a middle man. Hardware-wise, some cloud servers can get pretty beefy.

    -
    Expensive - Its a horrible capital cost. Cost of ownership will likely be cheaper though at scale.

    Major hardware crash on multiple servers would result in a lot of downtime - Depends on how you set it up, and which failure types you're covering. The underlying weakness is the same with the cloud setup because they're doing exactly the same thing.

    Complex and long to deploy - Yes.


    Cloud servers (VPS)

    +
    Relatively cheap - Amortizes engineering costs you would have spent over the life of the service.

    Little to zero downtime with a proper failover installed - Yes.

    Scalable - Yes.

    Instant or fast deployment - Yes. My favorite part.

    -
    Performance capped, generally slower than a premium cluster - Not necessarily so, but sometimes yes. Its multi hosting, so they have to keep it sane. See above for hybrid/private clouds if you need raw performance.

    Data privacy - Can do with virtual private clouds.

    No zero downtime possible - Depends on the underlying architecture. If its just a cloud VPS that moves around on failover, then obviously no. If they are able to give you HA loadbalancers, and you can scatter across DCs, then it is possible.

  6. #6
    @tchen big thanks for your detailed answer!

    Still, in most cases for VPS every files are hosted in a SAN with a lot of other clients files. This is not what I call data privacy. At least, it is not equal to a private cluster.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,030
    In that line of thinking, then your data should also be in a private Data Center without any other tenants, and no other employees accessing it, and a private network to boot.

    Modern technology and security has your data quite secure.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    938
    I think anyone who can break out of the container, break through the host's ACL and then also the SAN, and then remount your image, is more than likely capable of reprogramming a hardware router.

    The weakest link in cloud security is actually your api key.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by tchen View Post
    I think anyone who can break out of the container, break through the host's ACL and then also the SAN, and then remount your image, is more than likely capable of reprogramming a hardware router.

    The weakest link in cloud security is actually your api key.
    That is the key statement. Security from what we've seen in our platforms have been the policies of the provider. This is also the trend of technology in general. With more automation and simplification all things have moved towards this just like centralized management of entire office computers, phone systems, online banking, and so on.

    As technology grows, it becomes all that more important to know who you are doing business with, and to ensure that they have strong, established policies in place to secure their businesses and that of their customers.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,708
    Quote Originally Posted by CloudWeb View Post
    Well I didn't say anything about georedundancy as that is not Cloud or Cluster related, but yes you could add that to the mix as well.
    Sorry that was meant to be two different statements.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    UrNode - Virtual Solutions
    http://www.UrNode.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    816
    A cloud should be a redundant cluster of hardware, so atleast from my perspective of dealing with professional, 'do it right' hosting companies, you are talking about the same thing. I can't speak to the budget companies and their methods though.
    Linux & Windows Hosting Expert @ Contegix
    FedRAMP / HIPAA / PCI Compliant Cloud Solutions backed by 24x7x365 Technical Support
    Specializing in high traffic Drupal and WordPress compliant sites + highly customized solutions
    rjohnson@contegix.com -- 877-289-0395 x2018 -- www.Contegix.com

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-28-2011, 11:16 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 04:56 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2011, 05:19 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-13-2010, 12:10 PM
  5. Redundant / Load Balanced / Cluster / Failover IIS Servers
    By dneisler in forum Hosting Security and Technology
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-05-2004, 12:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •