Results 1 to 25 of 44
-
07-26-2009, 07:05 PM #1Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 92
How much downtime is too much downtime?
So I'm always one that gives my hosts the benefit of the doubt, but I was just curious to see from others how much downtime from one host will make you pack up your bags and leave?
-
07-26-2009, 07:06 PM #2Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 549
Any unplanned downtime is bad downtime, if it occurs and your datacenter doesn't give you an acceptable explanation - I'd start packing up.
█ Ekin Ersoy
█ Stagnom Servers | Europe Dedicated Servers with Redefined Support
█ Follow us on Twitter: @StagnomUK | Like us on Facebook: facebook.com/Stagnom
-
07-26-2009, 07:13 PM #3Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
Interesting, no one has considered the time-frame involved.
For matters under their control, a shared hosting environment should easily provide over 95% each month (that's 36 hrs/month downtime). If they can't do that you've got some incompetents working for you█ Collabora Hosting - Unlimited Windows and Linux Hosting
█ Web Security - VPS - Dedicated Servers
█ Cloud and Managed WordPress Hosting
█ Read how we do Unlimited Hosting at the Unlimited FAQ
-
07-26-2009, 08:20 PM #4Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 5,849
I expect a quality shared host to provide around 99.9% average, over a long period - say 6 months or more. In order to do that they'll need to achieve 99.95%-100% most months because very rare problems will occur (perhaps once a year or so) causing several hours of downtime. And I make no allowance for scheduled maintenance in this - it's better to be informed of downtime in advance but in the end the server's either working or it's not.
The hosts that can achieve that sort of uptime tend to be the ones offering more expensive, smaller plans. For a budget plan with generous disk and transfer limits I'd adjust my expectations down to around 99.5% average. And any host who delivers less than 98% over a single month (14 hours downtime) needs a good explanation and a convincing case for why it won't happen again, or I'll be leaving.
Just be careful of fake uptime "guarantees" and worthless SLAs. It really makes no difference what the host claims to offer - proven performance is what matters.Chris
"Some problems are so complex that you have to be highly intelligent and well informed just to be undecided about them." - Laurence J. Peter
-
07-26-2009, 08:26 PM #5Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 1,018
-
07-26-2009, 08:32 PM #6Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Photoshop
- Posts
- 382
We don't provide an uptime guarantee although our upstreams give us 100% guarantees because lets face it servers will go down at some point or another.
Maintenance is also sommet we have to factor in - like other hosts we do all we can to ensure we don't have to take sites offline. For example our servers operate hot-swap raid, dual nic's etc
Sometimes its not avoidable though but I would say between 30 - 120mins of downtime every few months is acceptable (I have very high standards).█ Rob - Creative Director
█ Peartree Digital Media Solutions & Peartree Hosting Department.
█ Providing a range of services from graphic design and XHTML coding to web hosting, VPS and dedicated servers.
█ My views and opinions are my own and in no way do they represent the company I work for...
-
07-26-2009, 08:41 PM #7Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 5,849
A guarantee without an SLA is meaningless (and arguably false advertising). SLAs are almost universally worthless. If you suffer 24 hours downtime in a month and your host (following SLA) gives you $10 credit, will that make you happy to stay?
For me the SLA is irrelevant - the host's explanation of what happened and their plans to prevent it happening again would be the main things that influence the stay / go decision.Chris
"Some problems are so complex that you have to be highly intelligent and well informed just to be undecided about them." - Laurence J. Peter
-
07-26-2009, 08:45 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 865
48 hours in a row is definitely too much.
-
07-26-2009, 08:58 PM #9Corporate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Houston, Texas, USA
- Posts
- 3,262
How much downtime have you experienced? Any facility will have down time (unplanned). We've long accepted that failover across facilities must be part of our business continuity plan.
RegardsUNIXy - Fully Managed Servers and Clusters - Established in 2006
Server Management - Unlimited Servers. Unlimited Requests. One Plan!
cPanel Varnish Plugin -- Seamless SSL Caching (Let's Encrypt, AutoSSL, etc)
Slow Site or Server? Unable to handle traffic? Same day performance fix: joe@unixy
-
07-26-2009, 09:08 PM #10Disabled
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- A box
- Posts
- 2,051
-
07-26-2009, 10:50 PM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- NYC / Memphis, TN
- Posts
- 1,454
If it drops below 99% there is an issue.
≈ PeakVPN.Com | Complete Privacy VPN | Cloud Hosting | Guaranteed Security | 1Gbps-10Gbps Unmetered
≈ PeakVPN | 31 VPN Servers | 17-Years Experience | Emergency 24/7 Support
≈ Visit us @ PeakVPN.Com (Coming SOON) | ASN: 3915
-
07-26-2009, 10:58 PM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Miami, Florida
- Posts
- 20,777
Hello,
Here is my take on Uptime. Everyone must remember that there are different reasons for downtime; planned maintenance, updates, server reboots, unplanned maintance, abuse, DDoS or DataCenter network issues.
A host should do the following
- ALWAYS inform their customers of planned maintenance, even if it only has a remote chance of client impact. It is best to e-mail all clients at least 48 hours in advanced if known.
- Have a network news page.
- Strive for 100% Uptime
-
07-26-2009, 11:08 PM #13Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada
- Posts
- 653
In my personal opinion any downtime longer than 12 hours is way too much. A host should try to keep downtime to as little as possible (hopefully 0 hours).
█ Tailored VPS offers fully customizable VPS Hosting
█ Powered by OpenVZ | Servers located in the USA | 99.9% Uptime
-
07-27-2009, 01:34 AM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
- Posts
- 3,641
█ Collabora Hosting - Unlimited Windows and Linux Hosting
█ Web Security - VPS - Dedicated Servers
█ Cloud and Managed WordPress Hosting
█ Read how we do Unlimited Hosting at the Unlimited FAQ
-
07-27-2009, 01:44 AM #15Devil's Advocate
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 3,883
Would I bother? no probably not....but most likely my clients who don't fully understand hosting etc would and as they're the ones who help pay my food and energy bills and my mortgage, then I'd need to protect their interests online.
I get phone calls from a few clients even if I reboot the server they're on lol. Some clients must live on their webpages.
I agree 8 minutes a day doesn't sound long....however, try hanging yourself by the bollocks for a few minutes and you'll soon realise even 2 minutes is a long time mate.
owmLast edited by Outlaw Web Master; 07-27-2009 at 01:53 AM.
‹(•¿•)›
Life's what you make it.
-
07-27-2009, 02:18 AM #16Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 549
█ Ekin Ersoy
█ Stagnom Servers | Europe Dedicated Servers with Redefined Support
█ Follow us on Twitter: @StagnomUK | Like us on Facebook: facebook.com/Stagnom
-
07-27-2009, 02:41 AM #17Disabled
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 3,597
It might be 10 mins of the downtime and that is the google update which is very important to you. I suppose in this case that would be to much for the downtime.
-
07-27-2009, 03:07 AM #18Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Sputnik's World
- Posts
- 82
Downtime every single day? Doesn't really matter if it's only 7 minutes, if they can't keep the server up for more than 24 hours without it going down, there is a problem, and if they aren't willing to figure out what it is and fix it, then it's time to find a new host.
As for the rest, I guess it depends on how frequent it is, how long it's down when it is down, and how badly it annoys me while it's down.
I'm always willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, and I can be understanding about downtime, it does happen. Hardware dies, lines get cut during construction season, hurricanes happen along the coasts, earthquakes. I expect them to have backup plans for when it does happen, but I know those things will result in at least SOME downtime.
It shouldn't however, be happening all the time, if it is, there is something wrong and it needs to be fixed.
-
07-27-2009, 03:28 AM #19Disabled
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 3,597
Downtime every single day?
-
07-27-2009, 03:45 AM #20Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 82
I run low traffic sites so I'm currently not too obsessed with perfection, but if it's going to be less than 98% I'd leave. Exception is of course planned maintenance, and if it's planned it should still be as short as possible downtime. Ex: When my webhost moved to a new datacenter, they were able to somehow keep servers offline/online for about 5 hours (confuses me; I think they ghosted HDDs and were able to switch from one data center to the other), and that was cool with me. They have weeks of notice + limited downtime for what they were doing.
-
07-27-2009, 04:15 AM #21Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 1,138
-
07-27-2009, 05:23 AM #22Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Photoshop
- Posts
- 382
Presumably emergency maintenance and planned maintenance are excluded?
█ Rob - Creative Director
█ Peartree Digital Media Solutions & Peartree Hosting Department.
█ Providing a range of services from graphic design and XHTML coding to web hosting, VPS and dedicated servers.
█ My views and opinions are my own and in no way do they represent the company I work for...
-
07-27-2009, 05:27 AM #23Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Singapore
- Posts
- 205
I have quite high standards. Anything below 99.8% uptime is unacceptable, although 99.9% is still best.
Lets face it - we have to reboot our servers from time to time.bikster.com - Quality Hosting. Affordable Prices.
Providing premium quality shared and reseller cPanel/WHM hosting at low prices!
Reseller cPanel/WHM hosting solutions that you can afford
-
07-27-2009, 07:09 AM #24Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- EU - east side
- Posts
- 21,920
That's 7.2 minutes in a day. You would really change hosts if your site was down between 11:00 pm and 11:08 pm. You are the one that's crazy!
I'm with foobic on this issue. Real uptime is what matters. I don't care that you have to repair your generators every 2 days and that the downtime is thus "scheduled". I don't care for SLAs and guarantees because the compensation is usually not worth the time it takes to request it, not to mention the aggravation caused by the downtime itself.
-
07-27-2009, 08:02 AM #25Newbie
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 6
Similar Threads
-
Shared = Downtime, VPS = Downtime and now I have DEDICATED its still downtime...
By treck33 in forum Dedicated ServerReplies: 45Last Post: 05-15-2007, 02:53 AM -
What Are The Causes Of Downtime
By Ken7 in forum Web HostingReplies: 12Last Post: 02-14-2006, 03:41 AM -
Customer complains about downtime...but no downtime according to log files
By thomas.smith in forum Providers and Network Outages and UpdatesReplies: 6Last Post: 11-09-2004, 12:57 AM -
Downtime in DC2?
By Urban Hitz Radio-NY in forum Dedicated ServerReplies: 2Last Post: 09-29-2003, 02:01 AM