Results 1 to 11 of 11
Thread: IFRAME and dynamic content
-
09-19-2003, 07:15 PM #1Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 62
IFRAME and dynamic content
Hello,
I designed a site with a main page which did iclude an iframe (floating from the dreamweaver extension) displaying a dynamic recordset php+mysql and repeated regions) . It is working well in IE , but I got nothing displayed in latest Netscape -Mozilla, and have different sized iframe in Opera.
The syntax of the iframe is :
Code:<td width="682" align="center" valign="top"> <div align="left"> <p align="center"><font color="771A35" size="6" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif, Arial"> <iframe src="http://www.domain.com/products.php?catid=2" name="MyFrame" frameborder="1" width="100%" height="100% align="top">If you see this message your browser does not support frames!</iframe> </font></p> <p>Resume Visible Page Content...</p> </div> </td>
-
09-19-2003, 10:34 PM #2Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Location
- Posts
- 452
Not sure if this will help, but you're missing the ending quote in height="100%.
BarbaraCommon sense isn't so common.
-
09-19-2003, 10:52 PM #3Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 277
Which goes to show you, dont trust IE to make sure your webpages look correct
Perl
Java
SQL
-
09-20-2003, 10:18 PM #4Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Posts
- 15
Unfortunately iframes are not fully compatible with netscape...
-
09-20-2003, 11:11 PM #5Designer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 2,195
Yes, iframes are fully compatible with netscape. The only thing that doesn't work well, in regards to iframes and NS is the CSS attributes applied to them.
In order to get your iframe to show up, simply add the following attribute to your iframe tag:
id="MyFrame"
Netscape needs the ID tag as IE needs the name tag.
-
09-20-2003, 11:15 PM #6Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 39
Trust IE to make sure they look correct, because the other browsers are pathetically inferior. If they don't support all code, they shouldn't be out there. Period.
DigitalPlazma.com - Development Studio
-
09-22-2003, 08:32 AM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- MO, USA
- Posts
- 1,104
If they don't support all code, they shouldn't be out there.
-
09-22-2003, 11:41 AM #8Designer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 2,195
Correct, blink doesn't work in IE any longer, and shouldn't work in any browser lol. That is probably one of the most annoying tags I have ever seen lol
What irritates me about NS is that it supports idiotic tags like blink, but can't handle some simple CSS attributes.
-
09-22-2003, 12:21 PM #9Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- MO, USA
- Posts
- 1,104
That is probably one of the most annoying tags I have ever seen
What?
<blink>
You don't like blink?
<blink>
I don't understand why anyone wouldn't like blink.
<blink>
-
09-23-2003, 08:51 AM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- My Old Kentucky Home....
- Posts
- 1,845
Marquee is almost as bad....
-
09-23-2003, 05:33 PM #11Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 39
Blink isn't supported by any new versions of browsers. Thank God.
Marquee is great for stock tickers, in place of a semi-complicated javascript.DigitalPlazma.com - Development Studio