Results 101 to 125 of 131
Thread: litespeed http server review
-
04-27-2009, 08:12 AM #101Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- patiala, punjab, india
- Posts
- 264
LightSpeed is Amazing.
i am using paid version, $44 per month.Get Best Prices for Domains - Secure payments via paypal using the Resellerclub interface. Sub Resellers invited. Hosting Companies i DON'T recommend anymore: MDDHosting, Hostgator, DownTownHost.
-
04-27-2009, 01:53 PM #102Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 544
We use LiteSpeed almost on all our Shared Hosting servers, and servers are really more stable then with Apache. I cannot remember when we had problems with some overload or downtime.
// AltusHost - European Web Hosting Provider
// Dedicated Servers & Managed Hosting that your business can depend on.
// Multiple Locations: Netherlands | Sweden | Bulgaria | Switzerland
// Superior 24/7 Technical Support
-
04-27-2009, 02:31 PM #103Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Posts
- 9,064
-
10-22-2009, 04:32 PM #104Disabled
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 1,426
I know this is an old thread and I may get in trouble for bumping it but I wanted to update since I have been using it since I made this thread which is over 2 years ago.
We still use litespeed on all of our servers and still swear by it. There has been a few problems here and there with bugs and security issues but it all gets fixed real fast. I know George personally and he listens to all of my reports and concerns no matter how paranoid or minor they are. He is a great guy and listens to his customers.
I give litespeed credit for making my business what it is today. I simply could not have done it with apache or any other web server. When I first made this post I was pretty much struggling trying to do ddos protected hosting with apache, with litespeed it made it much easier. Litespeed does not do it all for you, there is still lots of server and network level things needed but overall it is a very essential part of our services. I would also like to add that our network Staminus.net has also been an essential part of our growth. Without either one we probably would have been another failed hosting company.
I see lots of other hosts have converted to litespeed and lots of users like it. This makes for more competiton but Im glad to see it take off the way it did. I would like to think that I helped Litespeed grow to what it is today from my reviews, reccomendations and feedback.
And that is it, please dont kill me mods for bumping this I seen it on a google search and figured I would give it a 2 year update
-
10-24-2009, 07:08 AM #105Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 680
-
10-25-2009, 10:34 AM #106WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 116
I Find it funny how this thread is all about how litespeed is the best http server and provides better up-time... Yet I try and go to their website: http://www.litespeedtech.com/ and it times out
Lol, I cant say that I've used litespeed, I will give it a try when their site gets back up. :-\
-
10-25-2009, 10:42 AM #107WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 158
Their online store is still online & working fine.
http://store.litespeedtech.com/
-
10-25-2009, 10:52 AM #108WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 116
-
10-25-2009, 06:06 PM #109Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 210
Tried lsws now, to maybe give better performce than apache2 does.
I linked to up to the apache2 config, and it did work out of the box for a little while.
But when traffic started to get higher, the trouble started for me.
Its hopefully some config thats needed, but i need to test it more before putting it out in production, good its easy to swap back
-
11-28-2009, 11:09 PM #110Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Taylorsville, Utah
- Posts
- 46
Hey Now!
I have to give my 0.02! LiteSpeed Rocks! We use it on our shared servers and recommend it to all vps and dedicated clients as well.
We have been using it sooo much that we finally partnered with them and they are great to work with.█ TurboHosted Web Hosting
█ Fast, Quality Web Hosting
█ Call Us: (801) 876-0680
█ Visit Us Today | myTurboHosted
-
12-10-2009, 09:01 AM #111Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 820
I've decided to give Litespeed a go on my dedicated server. It should work well with my vBulletin forums.
-
12-10-2009, 02:12 PM #112Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- NY
- Posts
- 435
WHT this forum uses Litespeed, doesn't it?
-
12-10-2009, 03:07 PM #113Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Miami FL
- Posts
- 376
used to, but not anymore i believe
-
12-10-2009, 03:13 PM #114Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Taipei, Taiwan
- Posts
- 8
It looks like apache right now (from HTTP header response).
-
12-10-2009, 03:16 PM #115Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 1,471
WHT used Litespeed for a while, but then switched back to Apache.
-
12-10-2009, 03:19 PM #116Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Ecuaodr
- Posts
- 17
-
12-16-2009, 02:49 AM #117Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 2,203
LiteSpeed + LSAPI vs. Apache + Passenger vs. Nginx + Passenger
Many asked for updated benchmarks and here it is!
http://blog.litespeedtech.com/2009/1...enger/#more-97
-
12-31-2009, 12:45 AM #118Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 2,203
Benchmark Comparison on Serving Small Static Files: LiteSpeed vs Apache vs Nginx
http://blog.litespeedtech.com/2009/1...ache-vs-nginx/
-
05-26-2010, 09:31 PM #119Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- New York, USA
- Posts
- 17
Thanks a lot for this review, I'm finding out a lot about litespeed on here and I think I might make the switch if it will prove to be a legitimate performance advantage over Apache.
It seems like its a lot better for serving static files overall.Gamer Island - Free Flash Games
--------------------------------------------------------
iHostVPS - Cheap VPS Hosting
-
05-26-2010, 11:57 PM #120Premium Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 278
HI,
All our servers use LiteSpeed and we absolutely love it.cloudlayernetworks.com
We're a global provider of blazing fast cloud powered Web Hosting solutions.
-
01-02-2011, 06:01 AM #121Newbie
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 7
It sounds like LiteSpeed Servers were pretty popular 7 months ago, are they still doing well now?
I'm thinking about switching to them but just want to make sure nothing has changed since then...
Thanks for the helpLast edited by bear; 01-02-2011 at 11:45 AM.
-
01-02-2011, 06:04 AM #122Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 62
If you have budget and you need apache compatible .htaccess, go with litespeed.
Otherwise, consider lighttpd or nginx (I prefer nginx over anything)
-
01-03-2011, 07:27 AM #123Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 820
-
01-04-2011, 03:07 AM #124Newbie
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Kosovo
- Posts
- 17
LiteSpeed is so great.
I've use it before 2-3 months ago.
Now on my New Server I'm gonna take it.
Thanks.
-
01-04-2011, 09:16 AM #125Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- San Diego, CA
- Posts
- 604
█ Brent Presley - brent@innoscale.net
█ Innovative Scaling Technologies Inc. - Enterprise Cloud Hosting and Support
█ 24/7 Dedicated Support, Call us @ 1-888-722-8515
█ www.innoscale.net - Ashburn - Dallas - Seattle - Santa Clara - Chicago - Amsterdam