Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 131
  1. #101
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    patiala, punjab, india
    Posts
    264
    LightSpeed is Amazing.
    i am using paid version, $44 per month.
    Get Best Prices for Domains - Secure payments via paypal using the Resellerclub interface. Sub Resellers invited. Hosting Companies i DON'T recommend anymore: MDDHosting, Hostgator, DownTownHost.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    544
    We use LiteSpeed almost on all our Shared Hosting servers, and servers are really more stable then with Apache. I cannot remember when we had problems with some overload or downtime.
    // AltusHost - European Web Hosting Provider
    // Dedicated Servers & Managed Hosting that your business can depend on.
    // Multiple Locations: Netherlands | Sweden | Bulgaria | Switzerland
    // Superior 24/7 Technical Support

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    9,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Turelio View Post
    We use LiteSpeed almost on all our Shared Hosting servers, and servers are really more stable then with Apache. I cannot remember when we had problems with some overload or downtime.
    LiteSpeed is definitely an exceptional product.

    -mike
    Mike G. - Limestone Networks - Account Specialist
    Cloud - Dedicated - Colocation - Premium Network - Passionate Support
    DDoS Protection Available - Reseller Program @LimestoneInc - 877.586.0555

  4. #104
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,426
    I know this is an old thread and I may get in trouble for bumping it but I wanted to update since I have been using it since I made this thread which is over 2 years ago.

    We still use litespeed on all of our servers and still swear by it. There has been a few problems here and there with bugs and security issues but it all gets fixed real fast. I know George personally and he listens to all of my reports and concerns no matter how paranoid or minor they are. He is a great guy and listens to his customers.

    I give litespeed credit for making my business what it is today. I simply could not have done it with apache or any other web server. When I first made this post I was pretty much struggling trying to do ddos protected hosting with apache, with litespeed it made it much easier. Litespeed does not do it all for you, there is still lots of server and network level things needed but overall it is a very essential part of our services. I would also like to add that our network Staminus.net has also been an essential part of our growth. Without either one we probably would have been another failed hosting company.

    I see lots of other hosts have converted to litespeed and lots of users like it. This makes for more competiton but Im glad to see it take off the way it did. I would like to think that I helped Litespeed grow to what it is today from my reviews, reccomendations and feedback.

    And that is it, please dont kill me mods for bumping this I seen it on a google search and figured I would give it a 2 year update

  5. #105
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    680
    Quote Originally Posted by felosi View Post
    I know this is an old thread and I may get in trouble for bumping it but I wanted to update since I have been using it since I made this thread which is over 2 years ago.
    I hope you don't get in trouble, I think it's great that you gave us an update, thanks for your 2-year Litespeed review! Considering this and other reports, it looks like Litespeed is an excellent choice for many web servers.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    116
    I Find it funny how this thread is all about how litespeed is the best http server and provides better up-time... Yet I try and go to their website: http://www.litespeedtech.com/ and it times out

    Lol, I cant say that I've used litespeed, I will give it a try when their site gets back up. :-\

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    158
    Their online store is still online & working fine.
    http://store.litespeedtech.com/

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by bdnero View Post
    Their online store is still online & working fine.
    http://store.litespeedtech.com/
    Yea, their whole sites back up again. Prob just a reboot or something :-/ lol

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    210
    Tried lsws now, to maybe give better performce than apache2 does.
    I linked to up to the apache2 config, and it did work out of the box for a little while.
    But when traffic started to get higher, the trouble started for me.
    Its hopefully some config thats needed, but i need to test it more before putting it out in production, good its easy to swap back
    Busy, busy, busy

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Taylorsville, Utah
    Posts
    46
    Hey Now!

    I have to give my 0.02! LiteSpeed Rocks! We use it on our shared servers and recommend it to all vps and dedicated clients as well.

    We have been using it sooo much that we finally partnered with them and they are great to work with.
    TurboHosted Web Hosting
    █ Fast, Quality Web Hosting
    Call Us: (801) 876-0680
    Visit Us Today | myTurboHosted

  11. #111
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    820
    I've decided to give Litespeed a go on my dedicated server. It should work well with my vBulletin forums.

  12. #112
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    435
    WHT this forum uses Litespeed, doesn't it?

  13. #113
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Miami FL
    Posts
    376
    used to, but not anymore i believe

  14. #114
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    8
    It looks like apache right now (from HTTP header response).

  15. #115
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,471
    WHT used Litespeed for a while, but then switched back to Apache.

  16. #116
    Quote Originally Posted by ProDesigning View Post
    Hey Now!

    I have to give my 0.02! LiteSpeed Rocks! We use it on our shared servers and recommend it to all vps and dedicated clients as well.

    We have been using it sooo much that we finally partnered with them and they are great to work with.
    We have server with WHM. So, cPanel team maybe is working on it. Seem good option to implement in servers.

    Daniel

  17. #117
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,203
    LiteSpeed + LSAPI vs. Apache + Passenger vs. Nginx + Passenger

    Many asked for updated benchmarks and here it is!

    http://blog.litespeedtech.com/2009/1...enger/#more-97

  18. #118
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,203
    Benchmark Comparison on Serving Small Static Files: LiteSpeed vs Apache vs Nginx

    http://blog.litespeedtech.com/2009/1...ache-vs-nginx/

  19. #119
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    17
    Thanks a lot for this review, I'm finding out a lot about litespeed on here and I think I might make the switch if it will prove to be a legitimate performance advantage over Apache.

    It seems like its a lot better for serving static files overall.
    Gamer Island - Free Flash Games
    --------------------------------------------------------
    iHostVPS - Cheap VPS Hosting

  20. #120
    HI,

    All our servers use LiteSpeed and we absolutely love it.
    cloudlayernetworks.com
    We're a global provider of blazing fast cloud powered Web Hosting solutions.

  21. #121
    It sounds like LiteSpeed Servers were pretty popular 7 months ago, are they still doing well now?

    I'm thinking about switching to them but just want to make sure nothing has changed since then...

    Thanks for the help
    Last edited by bear; 01-02-2011 at 11:45 AM.

  22. #122
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    62
    If you have budget and you need apache compatible .htaccess, go with litespeed.
    Otherwise, consider lighttpd or nginx (I prefer nginx over anything)

  23. #123
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    820
    Quote Originally Posted by muratzilla View Post
    If you have budget and you need apache compatible .htaccess, go with litespeed.
    Otherwise, consider lighttpd or nginx (I prefer nginx over anything)
    I use to use Lightspeed but have stopped using it because of the price. I couldn't afford it, so I switched to Apache + nginx. Nginx handles the images, CSS and JavaScript while Apache processes the PHP requests.

  24. #124
    LiteSpeed is so great.
    I've use it before 2-3 months ago.
    Now on my New Server I'm gonna take it.

    Thanks.

  25. #125
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    604
    Quote Originally Posted by CH-Shaun View Post
    I use to use Lightspeed but have stopped using it because of the price. I couldn't afford it, so I switched to Apache + nginx. Nginx handles the images, CSS and JavaScript while Apache processes the PHP requests.
    Consider adding mod_ruid2 for the PHP requests. It's much faster than the default Apache PHP.
    Brent Presley - brent@innoscale.net
    Innovative Scaling Technologies Inc. - Enterprise Cloud Hosting and Support
    24/7 Dedicated Support, Call us @ 1-888-722-8515
    www.innoscale.net - Ashburn - Dallas - Seattle - Santa Clara - Chicago - Amsterdam

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •