RRolfe
11-27-2002, 10:26 PM
VPS Basic
3GB Space
5GB Bandwidth
1IP Address
Daily Backups
RedHat 7.2
Setup: $0
Monthly: $24.95
VPS Standard
5GB Space
10GB Bandwidth
1IP Address
Daily Backups
RedHat 7.2
Setup: $0
Monthly: $44.95
Add CPanel to any VPS for $20/mo
Order them online at:
http://www.wehostwebpages.com/vps.php
phpcoder
11-27-2002, 10:32 PM
Just curious... is it supposed to be 50GB and 100GB of bandwidth?
RRolfe
11-27-2002, 10:33 PM
ummm
let me think for a second...
Nope :D
MarcD
11-27-2002, 11:07 PM
This is the dedicated server forum
aarong
11-27-2002, 11:16 PM
Originally posted by MarcD
This is the dedicated server forum
would a virtual private server be considered dedicated? You get full root access...then again you are sharing this amoung other customers on one physical server. Then again VPS' are usually marketed as a cheaper alternative to dedicated servers.
*shrug*
dunno, I'm new here :D
RRolfe
11-27-2002, 11:22 PM
Originally posted by aarong
would a virtual private server be considered dedicated? You get full root access...then again you are sharing this amoung other customers on one physical server. Then again VPS' are usually marketed as a cheaper alternative to dedicated servers.
*shrug*
dunno, I'm new here :D
I see it as a cheap alternative to deds. So i posted it here, if the mods don't want it here then they will move it.
StarGhost
11-28-2002, 03:54 AM
5GB space and 10GB of bandwidth... hmm, that's an awful big gap. Not sure I can see a company offering an account with 500MB space and 1GB bandwidth.
And you can have your resellers on WHM to resell your 5G monthly transfer ? :)
pmak0
11-28-2002, 08:53 AM
would a virtual private server be considered dedicated? You get full root access...then again you are sharing this amoung other customers on one physical server.
From my experience with ServerCentral.net's virtual servers, it's not full root access.
For example, you can't bind to priviledged ports and the Apache executable isn't owned by you, so you can't recompile Apache if you need some custom functionality.
I'm not sure whether whw's virtual servers are like that, though.
jolly
11-29-2002, 08:33 AM
Bandwith crisis in VPS
:D
aarong
12-05-2002, 12:31 AM
Originally posted by pmak0
From my experience with ServerCentral.net's virtual servers, it's not full root access.
For example, you can't bind to priviledged ports and the Apache executable isn't owned by you, so you can't recompile Apache if you need some custom functionality.
I'm not sure whether whw's virtual servers are like that, though.
wow...there may be hope for my previously premiere service yet...
I dont know what kind of setup ServerCentral's is, but mine, and most other, VPS offerings are really root. You compile, run, and do whatever you want in you own little slice of the server. It's like VMware; only the host and the guest OS are the same [in my case FreeBSD 4.7] Linux has FreeVSD along with a few other projects that acheive the same functionality. I'm not familiar with it, but perhaps ServerCentral is running something like that, only locking them down tighter for some reason?
