Heartyoung
11-13-2002, 11:17 AM
This is a test file,30M
http://www.zicn.com/loves.rar
my own server
speed:????/s
area:????
http://www.zicn.com/loves.rar
my own server
speed:????/s
area:????
 | View Full Version : What speed that you down files from China dandanfirema 11-13-2002, 11:21 AM 9.09K/s from Burst Data center in Scranton, PA Smokie 11-13-2002, 11:37 AM 3.8kb with a 768 down load :( x222943 11-13-2002, 11:59 AM was getting 12-15kB/s... made a sharp drop off to around 1.5kB/s... kongen 11-13-2002, 12:13 PM 19 kb/s from Norway. Lippy 11-13-2002, 12:39 PM 22-23 Kb/s to start with 14 Kb/s was average finished at 12 Kb/s from Maryland off a Cable connection atr 11-13-2002, 12:43 PM --11:45:17-- http://www.zicn.com/loves.rar => `loves.rar' Resolving www.zicn.com... done. Connecting to www.zicn.com[202.97.174.242]:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 31,874,570 [application/octet-stream] 6% [=> ] 1,939,578 26.45K/s ETA 18:25 Location: Northern Virginia. Heartyoung 11-13-2002, 10:56 PM any more? graham 11-14-2002, 12:53 AM I'm getting a steady 45k/sec from our datacenter. We are near Albany, NY. Luxore 11-14-2002, 02:33 AM ~6.1KB/s from the Bay Area, California. The latency is pretty bad from where I am. It looks like things start getting choppy at cn.net. I have attached a traceroute below for your convenience: Host Name IP Address Hop Ping Time Ping Avg % Loss Pkts r/s Ping best/worst gumby.*****.com 63.193.232.66 1 0ms * Unknown Host * 0.0.0.0 2 0ms dist1-vlan50.snfc21.pbi.net 206.171.134.130 3 12ms bb1-g8-0.snfc21.pbi.net 209.232.130.82 4 13ms bb2-p12-0.snfc21.pbi.net 64.161.124.50 5 15ms bb1-p11-0.sntc01.pbi.net 64.161.124.245 6 15ms * Unknown Host * 64.161.1.30 7 15ms 166-49-238-205.concert.net 166.49.238.205 8 17ms t1c2-ge6-0.us-sfo.concert.net 166.49.228.2 9 24ms t1c2-p9-0.us-la.concert.net 166.49.240.74 10 27ms t1a3-ge7-0.us-la.concert.net 166.49.227.41 11 31ms 166-49-244-2.concert.net 166.49.244.2 12 28ms * Unknown Host * 202.97.51.197 13 1357ms p-15-0-r2-c-bjbj-1.cn.net 202.97.33.21 14 1366ms p-6-0-r4-c-bjbj-1.cn.net 202.97.37.10 15 1362ms p-6-0-r1-c-lnsy-1.cn.net 202.97.34.2 16 1363ms p-4-0-r1-a-lnsy-1.cn.net 202.97.41.34 17 1355ms * Unknown Host * 202.110.59.178 18 1342ms * Unknown Host * 202.107.109.2 19 1335ms * Unknown Host * 202.107.109.6 20 1357ms www.zicn.com 202.97.174.242 21 1316ms ClusterMania 11-14-2002, 03:16 AM From My DSL Pinging www.zicn.com [202.97.174.242] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.97.174.242: bytes=32 time=1905ms TTL=107 Reply from 202.97.174.242: bytes=32 time=1890ms TTL=107 Reply from 202.97.174.242: bytes=32 time=1902ms TTL=107 Reply from 202.97.174.242: bytes=32 time=1902ms TTL=107 Ping statistics for 202.97.174.242: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1890ms, Maximum = 1905ms, Average = 1899ms From a Cogent server ping www.zicn.com PING www.zicn.com (202.97.174.242): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=0 ttl=113 time=1440.191 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=1 ttl=113 time=1445.360 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=2 ttl=113 time=1434.426 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=3 ttl=113 time=1446.525 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=4 ttl=113 time=1446.696 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=5 ttl=113 time=1437.946 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=6 ttl=113 time=1472.953 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=7 ttl=113 time=1428.082 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=8 ttl=113 time=1425.702 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=9 ttl=113 time=1427.969 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=10 ttl=113 time=1436.526 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=11 ttl=113 time=1426.840 ms 64 bytes from 202.97.174.242: icmp_seq=12 ttl=113 time=1420.416 ms --- www.zicn.com ping statistics --- 15 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, 13% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1420.416/1437.664/1472.953/13.087 ms Kaumil 11-14-2002, 03:30 AM China connections always this bad? sigma 11-14-2002, 04:06 AM 900 ms ping, 12.24 kiloBYTES/sec. The OC-3c to Global Crossing seems to make a difference on this one, but yes, connectivity to China is often this bad. Maybe there's a satellite hop in there. Kevin ClusterMania 11-14-2002, 07:57 AM Could it be the Great Firewall Of China that could be causing this? I have read a bit about it. Would a firewall add this much latency? jolly 11-14-2002, 09:42 AM not good from here. AceWeb 11-14-2002, 11:08 AM 15k/sec on a t1 here. :) rk_usct 11-14-2002, 11:41 PM Originally posted by ClusterMania Could it be the Great Firewall Of China that could be causing this? I have read a bit about it. Would a firewall add this much latency? It's a part of it, i still remeber when i went to there i had to use proxy to access Google.com. :D but anyhow, 14kb/sec T3 here from Galveston, texas, USA 3listen 11-15-2002, 01:50 AM 50-60kb/s I'm in Australia, melbourne Using Telstra Bigpond Cable with uncapped download Shin 11-15-2002, 02:12 AM got between 10 and 15K at 1:15 am eastern on a DSL cybotix 11-15-2002, 02:27 AM apparently china's total international bandwidth is 20gbps or so... rk_usct 11-15-2002, 12:05 PM Originally posted by cybotix apparently china's total international bandwidth is 20gbps or so... no, China's internet is the same as U.S, only lots more firewalls, and limits, there's only one limit I'm not against --- NO PORN:D |