mixmox
08-15-2009, 02:38 PM
which of this service is better on monitoring and why?
hyperspin Or host-tracker ?
TNX
hyperspin Or host-tracker ?
TNX
![]() | View Full Version : hyperspin Or host-tracker ? mixmox 08-15-2009, 02:38 PM which of this service is better on monitoring and why? hyperspin Or host-tracker ? TNX JulesR 08-16-2009, 01:39 AM Give Panopta a try: www.panopta.com It beats both of them hands down :) iTom 08-16-2009, 04:37 AM hyperspin works great for us, not saying its the "best" but works well. Lagniappe-labgeek 08-17-2009, 10:36 PM Take a look at binarycanary.com as well. 30x 1 minute monitors for $10/month is hard to beat. They're checking has been spot on for us. TailoredVPS 08-18-2009, 01:14 AM We use both Host-Tracker and Hyperspin. They both work very well. I personally like Hyperspin better though. WebbyCart 08-18-2009, 01:17 AM Hi, We like hyperspin as well. Bobby gate2vn 08-18-2009, 10:37 AM I am evaluating panopta.com, they seems good. However, lack of some features, when comparing to Pingdom. Their support is a bit slower than Pingdom too. Panopta seems a good choice, and they keep adding features, but if signing up right now, I would suggest Pingdom. Give Panopta a try: www.panopta.com inspiron 08-18-2009, 11:08 AM I vote for hyperspin for it reliability. bdnero 08-18-2009, 11:36 AM I used both but hyperspin have more features then host-tracker JulesR 08-27-2009, 02:08 PM I am evaluating panopta.com, they seems good. However, lack of some features, when comparing to Pingdom. Their support is a bit slower than Pingdom too. Panopta seems a good choice, and they keep adding features, but if signing up right now, I would suggest Pingdom. Which features are those? I can't see anything obvious in the Pingdom feature list that isn't in Panopta. Just curious :) JLHC 08-27-2009, 02:24 PM I have used both of them and I will definitely recommend Hyperspin than host-tracker. Another provider that you may want to take a look at is Pingdom. :agree: UnderHost 08-27-2009, 03:03 PM which of this service is better on monitoring and why? hyperspin Or host-tracker ? TNX Pingdom.com :) but between those i suggest you hyperspin. Ekin 08-27-2009, 03:37 PM Hyperspin is awesome, doesn't have all the glittery bits like Pingdom but does the job very efficiently! The Rover 08-27-2009, 08:54 PM I'd recommend either hyperspin or siteuptime mixmox 08-29-2009, 02:09 PM i have pay them for 3 month.i mean host tracker. but they suspend my acc after one month and they dont answer my email. i hate them. any way i see new monitoring service in this topic. but i wnat know ,why some one as you.chose for example siteuptime.com panopta.com or ... .i see hyperspin and its feature are fantasic. gate2vn 08-30-2009, 07:05 AM Traceroutes for example. In Pingdom, you can see traces from monitoring servers to yours, and decide what the issue is. I have asked Panopta, and they said they might add it in next few months. Which features are those? I can't see anything obvious in the Pingdom feature list that isn't in Panopta. Just curious :) mixmox 09-17-2009, 08:08 AM oh. so i will register on pingdom as you say its better than hyperspin and hosttracker. pingdom.its better that other.so why some one resgiter on for example on http://www.siteuptime.com/ ?? i think that pingdom feature is better than it. ???? Panopta 09-18-2009, 04:40 PM Traceroutes for example. In Pingdom, you can see traces from monitoring servers to yours, and decide what the issue is. I have asked Panopta, and they said they might add it in next few months. Just to follow up, we launched the traceroute functionality for all of our customers earlier this week. JulesR 09-18-2009, 04:42 PM Just to follow up, we launched the traceroute functionality for all of our customers earlier this week. I thought you did! Was gonna post this, but couldn't find my newsletter e-mail :) Great job as always, Panopta. |