Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : How long has it been, your first computer? Memories, rants...


Tim Greer
04-03-2001, 07:59 AM
This is really strange, because I was just about to post about this and saw another poster that just posted a little while ago about this same company. What was your first computer or first few and how long ago? Looking at this, I feel old!

After begging my mother and grandmother (my siblings were helpful with this too, btw) and getting an Atari 2600 video game system, to play Pong, Space Invaders, Pac-man (I figured out a pattern, btw, to where I could never die and stay up for days playing it getting the highest score -- to the point that I fell asleep in school the next day, which was the only time that ever happened), Frogger, Donkey Kong, Pole Position, Astroids and Jungle Pit (go left, backwards, btw, it makes the game easier), etc. We got it, and promised to "be good for the rest of our lives, because this is all we wanted".

THIS is wall I wanted??? Okay, be understanding, it was like 1978 or 1979 and I was 6 or 7 years old.

http://www.heydon.org/kevan/collection/pictures/atari-2600-large.jpg

http://www.heydon.org/kevan/collection/manufacturer-atari/2600.html

Well, that didn't last long, since I now needed a computer to make my own games. So, my mother bought my brother and I an Atari 400 with membrane keyboard an a nice 600 baud tape drive/recorder. *l*

This beauty brings back memories:
http://www.heydon.org/kevan/collection/pictures/atari-400-large.jpg

Information about this wonder junk:
http://www.zock.com/8-Bit/D_400.HTML

I recall buying computer magazine's like Antic and going through all the books I could read or find or buy about programming. I recall making all the graphics, plotting them out, doing images and animation's, making things move.. doing the ocean waves on the beach and programming in the sound of seagulls, etc. It was very cool.

At the time, computer science was just being introduced into schools. I wasn't old enough and had to wait a few years, so my brother and I had to sneak into the computer class on recess and use the cool Apple's and Franklin Apple knockoff's and play the cool games it had and program a little.

Then, we were lucky enough to get a faster system with real keys, an Atari 800, like my cousin was bragging about at the time.

http://www.zock.com/8-Bit/D_800.HTML

Oh, that thing rocked! We started going to local Atari club meetings at the local Rico's Pizza and meeting a lot of dateless nerds. Needless to say, I stopped going and just spent a reasonable amount of time at home and at friend's houses, not dedicated special days to hang around a lot of the people at the time.. I was young (like 10 or 12) and had my reputation to worry about. *L*

Not too long after, we moved up the the XL model, which was even cooler. I tell you, those keyboards are not to be taken apart above a shag carpet! Two tiny springs under each key and not way to stop them from popping all over the floor! What else can you do, when nice sticky Pepsi spills into the keyboard? However, the keyboards were a lot better built than these crappy one's I see today.. I want one with springs, etc., not one that gets worn the more you type, and you all know about me and typing. I go through a ton of keyboards.. Well, not a ton, more like 3/4 a ton.

http://www.zock.com/8-Bit/D_800XL.HTML

I always dreamed about the 1200 XL and then the 1500 or 5000? I don't recall, but it had great graphics and was the best out at the time. Of course, I never got this beauty.
http://www.zock.com/8-Bit/D_1200XL.HTML

[Edit: I actually think I went from the 400, to the 600, then 800 and then 800 XL and then finally to the 800 XL with the expansion, which was better than the 1200 XL... but there was something better, right before Amega bought out Atari (I think that's what happened?) and it had all the cool 5 and 1/4" floppies.. oh yeah!]

More information:
http://www.computingmuseum.com/museum/ata800.htm

Atari was very advances and cool, for it's time and some of the ideas have yet to be improved upon (advocate), but it does suck pretty bad (attack).


By now, were figured out all the cool things, like certain numbers, dialing BBS's across the world, free of charge, downloading all the new cool games, (yes, they had modems) and ran our own BBS. After about 1985 or 86 or 87', Atari was fading fast and I wasn't much into it anymore anyway, although my brother was still hanging out with those Rico's Pizza guys and going to meetings and staying in the computer programming stuff.

I didn't want to try and use all those "PC Jr.'s" I was hearing about and the languages, etc. I was to the point of doing binary and assembly, not just basic. I didn't want to use another platform. PC, bah!

I got back into it in the late, late 80's (89, possibly early 90's) and starting using the Internet and BBS's and eventually started doing web design, HTML, etc. I did that and needed to do more and more. So, I got into Unix variants, used everything I could, started programming in various languages for purposes of the Internet for CGI in languages like Perl, etc. Of course, the need for doing things, became my tasks, as I had to, over the course, learn how to do an abundance of tasks, using web servers, configuring systems, programming fast and secure scripts, etc.

Always having fun, improving, learning more. I had to, this was when Apache was first out, systems had low hardware specs. I couldn't get away with sloppy code or slow code or buggy code, because it'd crash that monster server with the Pentium 75 MHZ CPU and 16 Megs RAM... yes a server... I couldn't do what a lot of people still do today and write slow code and assume it'll run properly on a 500+ MHZ CPU with lots of RAM. Ever wonder why servers don't really seem to run much better now-a-days? In certain areas, they do, but servers like NT, ISP's ran NT servers with 32 to 64 Megs RAM, with 100, 120 to 133 MHZ CPU's for dialin customers with largish modem pools and didn't have any problems. Now, Win2K REQUIRES at least 128 Megs RAM? I'll never use any system that requires so much hardware resources. Why build faster systems, if the software is going to just going to require more of it and balance out to be the same? Screw that! Give me a Unix dog slow system and I'll tweak it to run right! What is the cyber-world coming to!!?!? *panic!*

Well, that's my story in a nut shell, just looking at those old Atari's really was fun, and kind of scary too! People have ported things like Perl over to it, years ago and still do. Interesting idea, to get some system none of the younger system crackers can figure out and program your own customized protocols and services. It would be cool to see some dork get lost trying to figure out what to do. *l* And YES, I AM bored. :-)

[Edited by Tim_Greer on 04-03-2001 at 08:15 AM]

Exbodyguard
04-03-2001, 08:37 AM
I cant say I ever programmed an atari, but I remember when my cousins got that great commodore64. Man , we playred on it for hours... programmed I/O in basic .. even had a sorta piano playing on it at one time...

My first one was a Texas Instruments TI 994a. It used cartridges for games (kinda like N64)and an old cassette recorder for memory. I think its still around.

Even now i still use an old compaq 486 at home. 400mb HD 32 mb ram ( i upgraded to run NT 4)and various components that i scoffed here and there.

Talk about reliable....... It never crashes... I format once a month to clean it up.....

A friend of mine used to have an amiga.... he could do some amazing things... he programmed a "weather Witch" ( it took input on current conditions and gave a reliable 5 day forcast.) That was in '85, now he programs security applications... quite a step.............

And Tim you are right.... the bigger and better the OS the more system resources it hogs...

When i think about running a server i'm thinking in the later PIII generation.

We do however have a linux server running mandrake 7.1 on a P200 with 64 mb of ram... it smokes.......

JTY
04-03-2001, 08:45 AM
My first computer was an Apple Performa 575.... within a month of getting it, I wanted to learn how to program.... AppleScript, was easy to learn.... within 6 months, of owning the computer, I got a copy of Metrowerks Codewarrior, and started learning C....


Only, bummer is that my interest in programming faded.....

Tim Greer
04-03-2001, 09:01 AM
Cool, now you're talking! I recall Amiga, right before they folded, my brother bought their last and greatest model. That was a nice system and that was only maybe 7 years ago or so. We also used the C64 and the Radio Shack TSR80 (Trash-80, which I believe everyone called them :-)

As I've said on some of my other posts in these forums, excluding my wife's 533 MHZ, 64 Meg Ram, 30 GIG system w/ a printer and scanner, CD R/W (which is also hooked up to my network at home), I have other systems on the network and my most powerful one, I'm on now, is a multi-boot Win NT server (for graphics and because I didn't want to bother to replace that crappy Winmodem and I could never find the specs for my monitor and every setting I tried on X would tweak my monitor badly -- I do have a U.S. Robotics 56K modem now and found the specs on the monitor, but never tried it, since I'm only caring about a command line and web server environment anyway, not home use), that boots into (most now and some I'll add soon onto free partitions) various OS's, like Linux SuSe, Redhat 6, 6.2, 7.0, Linux Slackware, Debian, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD and others. (Soon to happen to my wife's 30 Gig drive too, and it's ready for a lot of OS's).

My system I speak of, has an AMD K6 266 MHZ CPU, 64 Megs RAM (two 32 meg DIMMS), a Space Walker board, no sound (don't need it or really care) CD ROM drive, a 2 Meg video card (maybe it's 4?), a Seagate 6.4 GIG IDE ATA/66 and a Western Digital 17.2 GIG ATA/66 IDE. This thing, be it NT, FreeBSD, Linux, whatever, it also "smokes". I have no need or reason to get a faster system, although it'd surely be nice, but why? A decent speed system (that only a few years ago was about as fast as any local ISP ran their servers on with great speed and performance) is all that's needed and it's a great environment to truly test the performance of your software, if you program, as well as all around server performance. It's good to see how things work in a reasonable environment, rather than a 700+ MHZ system with 128, 256 or 512 megs RAM with SCSI drives on huge lines. Not that that's a bad thing, but it's better and easier to get accurate bench marking results and see the performance in real time.

My other systems on my network are somewhat like the system you mentioned. I have a few 386's, 486's and 586's. Old boards, (they all use 10/100 NIC's though, into a 10baseT HUB -- I should upgrade it to 100, but I don't move that much across that network that often), and anywhere from a 33 MHZ with 4 to 8 megs RAM, to 90, 100, 120, 166, 200, 220, 233 and 266 MHZ CPU's with anywhere from 8, to 12, to 32 or 40+ Megs RAM on them and drives ranging from 150 Megs to 2 or 4 GIG's. These work fine with any Unix variant and you hardly notice a speed issue, unless you're compiling MySQL or something -- which does work fine once it's installed. These trashy little systems work well enough for testing and just wiping out if you choose to and not care too much about it, but do it all realistically.

I mean, I have a lot of servers I need to program for or work on and I need to know things run well or be able to try out inventive ideas and not worry about even a small bug if the server gets a high load from something else and have my program screw up or bring down the system. Testing things on development servers is fine, but if you succeed in testing something and bring down a server and don't have a remote hard-boot option, you're stuck and you can't see things as they happen. I like to know these things and I like to mess around with it too.

A fast system would still be nice though, but this keeps me and forces me to code the best code I can, which the majority of people don't seem to care about anymore... which sucks. Anyway, that just all reminded me, once again, about how I'm not really concerned about the most powerful system, although knowing how to configure, set up and run them is a definite necessity. Anyway, it's all fun, and that's all that matters. :-)

akashik
04-03-2001, 09:10 AM
even had a sorta piano playing on it at one time...


The plastic thing you put over the keyboard?? I have one of those in the hallways cupboard still. I think it still has the original manual and box (though the box has seen better days) :) Ahh, fun times....

Greg Moore

Exbodyguard
04-03-2001, 11:42 AM
No actually it was like a basic program that we programmed. Gave each key a function and got sound from it.. like a pre first generation midi composer i suppose.

Tim Greer
04-03-2001, 05:22 PM
Originally posted by Exbodyguard
No actually it was like a basic program that we programmed. Gave each key a function and got sound from it.. like a pre first generation midi composer i suppose.




I thought that's what you had meant... Did you ever code one of the speaking programs? I.e., where you type in a combination of letters and it tried to speak them as words. Worked about 65% of the time and the rest came out garbage, but it was pretty cool.

Exbodyguard
04-03-2001, 08:52 PM
No, but i wish i still had the commodore... i'd sit and give it a try if i could find the program....
man i feel like a kid again...........

akashik
04-03-2001, 09:31 PM
Hit up the old second hand places and Salvation Army places etc. You have to dig into the back but there's usually a C64 hidden in most of them - they're getting rare though. You may need to do a little repair on it (usually loose wires), but they're a tough old stick and don't break too easily. My old one is beyond repair now. It got given to a two year old as a play thing :)

Greg Moore