Curious Cat
09-07-2002, 01:52 AM
Can anyone recommend me any hosting company that they have been using for the past 3 years without experiencing any downtime?
![]() | View Full Version : 3 year reliability test Curious Cat 09-07-2002, 01:52 AM Can anyone recommend me any hosting company that they have been using for the past 3 years without experiencing any downtime? coight 09-07-2002, 02:18 AM Originally posted by Curious Cat Can anyone recommend me any hosting company that they have been using for the past 3 years without experiencing any downtime? That's not possible Haze 09-07-2002, 02:27 AM Originally posted by Myacen That's not possible Rob's got a point there. Servers go down for a lot of reasons, 1 being updates. If its a windows box some updates require a reboot. If its a linux box, every kernel upgrade requires a reboot. Sometimes hardware goes bad and causes downtime.. its inevitable, it will happen. Your best bet is to find a host with a good rep. and make sure you always have a recent backup of your site. octeto 09-07-2002, 02:53 AM Originally posted by Curious Cat Can anyone recommend me any hosting company that they have been using for the past 3 years without experiencing any downtime? http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html MotleyFool 09-07-2002, 03:02 AM IF some one is having 3 years of 100% uptime it means that they are having old kernels [which may have many security holes], and definitely old hardware Upto you if you want to host your site there.. 300-350 days is the max. After that every host must change hardware in my opinion. Curious Cat 09-07-2002, 04:44 AM Or I should said unscheduled downtime. Because I consider those point that you guys mentioned as schedule maintenance. What I am referring to is sudden shut down of services without prior notice. Just a little suggestion, may be the administrator can make a compilation of unscheduled downtime incident of each hosting company reported by the forumer. so at the end of each year we can actually tell who are the reliable one and who are not. Jedito 09-07-2002, 06:18 AM Originally posted by Myacen That's not possible Not really, doing round robin or something like that you can offer 100% uptime. Of course, that could be quite expensive. MotleyFool 09-07-2002, 09:25 AM Well I am tempted to brag a little here! We have had 100% uptime for 217 days as of today! [with 2 hours scheduled downtime for Apache upgrade and 5 hours scheduled downtime for network upgrade by our NOC in all the 217 days]. But I still wouldn't give any uptime guarantee because redundancy is expensive and clients dont want to pay extra for higher than 99% availability. dektong 09-07-2002, 10:37 AM Originally posted by MotleyFool IF some one is having 3 years of 100% uptime it means that they are having old kernels [which may have many security holes], and definitely old hardware Upto you if you want to host your site there.. 300-350 days is the max. After that every host must change hardware in my opinion. Not if they have web server farm/cluster where you can take any one web server down and their site will still be up and running. They can upgrade the kernel, the OS, the hardwares and just leaving one web server up and their site will still be up. Curious Cat 09-08-2002, 02:16 AM Originally posted by MotleyFool Well I am tempted to brag a little here! We have had 100% uptime for 217 days as of today! [with 2 hours scheduled downtime for Apache upgrade and 5 hours scheduled downtime for network upgrade by our NOC in all the 217 days]. But I still wouldn't give any uptime guarantee because redundancy is expensive and clients dont want to pay extra for higher than 99% availability. Care to share what is your site? jayglate 09-08-2002, 05:21 AM My name server has 1 plus years uptime. a web server has over 7 months uptime. Mail server going on 2 years now. Aussie Bob 09-08-2002, 05:23 AM Originally posted by MotleyFool Well I am tempted to brag a little here! We have had 100% uptime for 217 days as of today! [with 2 hours scheduled downtime for Apache upgrade and 5 hours scheduled downtime for network upgrade by our NOC in all the 217 days]. But I still wouldn't give any uptime guarantee because redundancy is expensive and clients dont want to pay extra for higher than 99% availability. :) depends on what the server is doing. If it's got 40 resellers, then uptime is not going to be the same as if it's just hosting 1 site. :D tazzy 09-08-2002, 12:06 PM Depends what the one site is :D |