Is ClientExec good ? creates accounts automatically ? why is WhmCS better ?
I found ClientExec a little complicated for the start, WhmCS has a nice and user friendly interface.

Need advice to choose . Thanks

Is ClientExec good ? creates accounts automatically ? why is WhmCS better ?
I found ClientExec a little complicated for the start, WhmCS has a nice and user friendly interface.

Need advice to choose . Thanks
vote for WHMCS!! :D

There are other billing scripts like WHMautopilot and AWBS.
We're using awbs and is very happy with it.
IMO WHMCS copies a lot of ideas from other scripts.

For us, WHMCS has worked very well..

WHMCS is the best out there.

Can anyone say why one is better than the other?

Thanks! :)

WHMCS is frequently updated, easy to use, has some great features, the support from Matt is fast and it has a great community.

We've been using it since we started and don't plan on moving yet :)

There are other billing scripts like WHMautopilot and AWBS.
We're using awbs and is very happy with it.
IMO WHMCS copies a lot of ideas from other scripts.

That may be true, but it executes them better, easier and IMHO, more reliabily.

Vote for WHMCS...:D

clientexec is lacking in functions, server, and domain registar integration compared to whmcs. The basics are all there, but if you don't have the server admin panel and domain registrars that ce supports, you'll have to do it all manually.

Go with WHMCS, ClientExec is nice but it isn't as robust and feature rich as WHMCS.

WHMCS is the best because it works and it has a better ui than clientexec.

Both are good products and ubersmith is good also (for the larger host especially).