Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : HostPacket.net Down... AGAIN!?


Piano
08-24-2002, 12:02 AM
Everyone, could you please try to access: http://www.hostpacket.net ?

It seems like their site is down, as well as all sites hosted by them.

What's gives? :bawling: :confused:

NetXL
08-24-2002, 12:04 AM
I get a 500 internal server error.
:(

Abby
08-24-2002, 12:07 AM
Yep. DNS again. Unbelievable. Considering I specifically asked them about their DNS stability before signing up.

I never cancelled with my other host and I'm thinking of switching back. It's been touch and go the past two weeks at Hostpacket with uptime. Good for a cheap host if you want some dev space, but not so good if you want to run a site.

Abby
08-24-2002, 12:27 AM
Domain is working now. The IP was always good.

Like I said, it's been great for dev stuff, but when it comes to needing a site that's up all the time, I just don't know ... my last two weeks have been less than great.

bruce1234at
08-24-2002, 01:06 AM
Originally posted by Abby
Domain is working now. The IP was always good.

Like I said, it's been great for dev stuff, but when it comes to needing a site that's up all the time, I just don't know ... my last two weeks have been less than great.

thanks for the comments. i was considering them for my new site, but i think i might go with my current host now. i don't want my new site going up and down like a yo-yo.

Abby
08-24-2002, 01:15 AM
If you'd like to ask me again in one more week, I'll let you know how things shape up. On their board, they've announced that they are adding a machine to handle the overloaded domains come Monday. So they say they are addressing the problem.

bruce1234at
08-24-2002, 01:22 AM
overloaded server does not sound too tempting i must admit! why do some hosts overload their servers? usually because their too greedy.

Andrew
08-24-2002, 01:25 AM
A server that's nowhere near capacity can be overloaded by lack of proper management on the part of the admin. Could be a bunch of things. It's not always the host being greedy. :)

bruce1234at
08-24-2002, 01:47 AM
Originally posted by lightnin
A server that's nowhere near capacity can be overloaded by lack of proper management on the part of the admin. Could be a bunch of things. It's not always the host being greedy. :)

true. there are other factors i guess.

Synthetic
08-24-2002, 01:52 AM
Posted on the HostPacket.net forums: Server# 2 is almost full with 190 domainsIt also seems like Apache constantly "fails" on their servers, which has been another reason for all their downtime.

dk2002
08-24-2002, 02:05 AM
We was alarmed 1 minute after Apache failed on # 2, it takes another few minutes to debug the conf file and restart Apache probably, it was maximum 10 minutes only

looks like the thread starter is frauder and just want to attack us, Apache failed won't affect any clients on main server at all, I've seem other hosts down for over 24 hours and start getting complain, not for less than 10 minutes :mad:

synergymax
08-24-2002, 02:12 AM
Considering all your downtime so far this month and considering 99.9% uptime "guarantee" allows 40 minutes of downtime a MONTH (not a day) I'd suggest you stop pointing the fingure at people who are posting the truth and start spending more time managing your servers.

dk2002
08-24-2002, 02:18 AM
Server# 3 is coming at Monday and will be secondary name server

Firewall is activated, 3rd party and in-house monitor are functioning

What else do you want matt?

synergymax
08-24-2002, 02:32 AM
Originally posted by dk2002
Server# 3 is coming at Monday and will be secondary name server

Firewall is activated, 3rd party and in-house monitor are functioning

What else do you want matt?
1. A webhost that delivers what they promise.
2. A webhost that freely admits to its mistakes & problems.
3. A webhost that doesn't attempt to minimise genuine concerns about their service and then blow them off as if they didn’t happen or aren't important.

August 2002 - Server 1
08.21.2002 04:01 Connection refused 46 mins
08.20.2002 06:52 No reply 34 mins
08.19.2002 12:24 DNS lookup failed 3 hours, 17 mins
08.19.2002 07:56 No reply 1 hour, 53 mins
08.19.2002 04:03 Connection refused 15 mins
08.13.2002 15:17 Timeout 6 hours, 5 mins
08.10.2002 15:24 No reply 1 hour, 57 mins
08.09.2002 06:11 No reply 32 mins
08.08.2002 13:33 No reply 14 mins
08.08.2002 09:30 Connection refused 15 mins

August - 924 Minutes downtime. (15 hours 45 minutes)

August - 31 Days (744 hours)

97.87% uptime so far this month.

(System uptime measured by EasyMonitor -http://www.easymonitor.com)

Matt

dk2002
08-24-2002, 02:48 AM
you're using free monitor and check every 15 minutes, we're using alertra.com and absolute e-business monitor that check every 1 minute

plus its inaccurate and cannot connect to Time Warner during our provider problem (same as InternetSeer), it's unprofessional to show our stats that show inaccurate/incorrect data

alertra.com show our uptime is 98.96% and absolute e-business monitor show our uptime is 98.22%

synergymax
08-24-2002, 03:10 AM
Originally posted by dk2002
you're using free monitor and check every 15 minutes, we're using alertra.com and absolute e-business monitor that check every 1 minute

plus its inaccurate and cannot connect to Time Warner during our provider problem (same as InternetSeer), it's unprofessional to show our stats that show inaccurate/incorrect data

alertra.com show our uptime is 98.96% and absolute e-business monitor show our uptime is 98.22%

If they can't connect to you during your "provider problems" that's a fair indication of overall network performance - you can't just take the good and dismiss the bad.

Whilst EasyMonitor is free and only checks every 15 minutes this no doubt means it misses some downtime as well.

98.96% = 7.74 Hours downtime for August 2002
98.22% = 13.25 Hours downtime for August 2002

99.9% is advertised (45 minutes - TOTAL)

Matt

Synthetic
08-24-2002, 03:38 AM
Originally posted by dk2002
alertra.com show our uptime is 98.96% and absolute e-business monitor show our uptime is 98.22% But still... isn't that below your 99.9% uptime guarantee?

A previous post of yours:
P.S. uptime dropped to 99.0%, too bad luck this month... :(

wiredpioneer
08-24-2002, 11:54 AM
Give the guys at Hostpacket a chance, I am sure they will get it right eventually. Remember that they haven't been around for too long so there's a lot for them to learn. As a client I still have faith in them.

net-trend
08-24-2002, 12:04 PM
Originally posted by wiredpioneer
Give the guys at Hostpacket a chance, I am sure they will get it right eventually. Remember that they haven't been around for too long so there's a lot for them to learn. As a client I still have faith in them.

Whoa....hosts need more clients like you...:D

dev
08-24-2002, 12:06 PM
I was thinking about going with them as well so I put my monitor on them a couple of months ago. Glad I decided to do this. Here are the stats:


HOSTPACKET.NET(HTTP) DOWN TIME STATS:
-----------------------------------
Summary from: 22/06/02 22:15:23
to: 24/08/02 17:03:36
h:mm
Total Time = 1506:48
Down Time = 32:43 (2.171%)
Shortest = 0:05
Longest = 5:55 (on 13/08/02 10:10:06)
Fails = 89
___________________________________
Monthly Totals:
Fails h:mm %
2002/06 6 2:15 1.161 *
2002/07 60 12:54 1.734
2002/08 23 17:34 3.087 *
___________________________________
Down Times (h:mm):

24/08/02 04:56 - 05:24 = 0:28
22/08/02 22:09 - 22:17 = 0:08
22/08/02 21:47 - 21:53 = 0:05
21/08/02 19:19 - 19:25 = 0:05
20/08/02 23:13 - 23:41 = 0:28
20/08/02 22:51 - 22:57 = 0:05
20/08/02 02:01 - 02:17 = 0:15
19/08/02 22:14 - 22:20 = 0:05
19/08/02 19:05 - 19:12 = 0:07
19/08/02 07:02 - 10:32 = 3:29
19/08/02 02:54 - 04:50 = 1:55
18/08/02 21:48 - 21:54 = 0:06
16/08/02 03:10 - 03:15 = 0:05
15/08/02 22:18 - 22:26 = 0:08
13/08/02 10:10 - 16:05 = 5:55
10/08/02 10:20 - 12:15 = 1:55
10/08/02 01:58 - 02:04 = 0:05
09/08/02 01:21 - 01:41 = 0:19
08/08/02 18:46 - 18:54 = 0:07
08/08/02 11:43 - 12:13 = 0:30
08/08/02 04:29 - 04:34 = 0:05
07/08/02 13:52 - 14:36 = 0:43
05/08/02 01:54 - 02:21 = 0:26
29/07/02 15:27 - 15:33 = 0:05
28/07/02 23:47 - 00:11 = 0:23
27/07/02 19:09 - 19:21 = 0:11
27/07/02 09:09 - 09:18 = 0:08
26/07/02 16:57 - 17:06 = 0:08
26/07/02 16:27 - 16:35 = 0:08
26/07/02 13:37 - 13:49 = 0:11
26/07/02 09:50 - 09:59 = 0:09
26/07/02 06:53 - 07:05 = 0:11
26/07/02 01:55 - 02:05 = 0:09
25/07/02 21:07 - 21:13 = 0:05
25/07/02 20:02 - 20:13 = 0:10
25/07/02 17:30 - 17:38 = 0:08
25/07/02 16:56 - 17:11 = 0:15
25/07/02 16:03 - 16:13 = 0:10
25/07/02 15:01 - 15:08 = 0:07
25/07/02 14:20 - 14:27 = 0:07
25/07/02 13:06 - 13:29 = 0:23
25/07/02 12:11 - 12:18 = 0:07
25/07/02 10:37 - 10:45 = 0:08
25/07/02 10:06 - 10:15 = 0:09
25/07/02 09:32 - 09:43 = 0:10
25/07/02 08:29 - 08:38 = 0:08
25/07/02 07:58 - 08:07 = 0:08
25/07/02 07:09 - 07:18 = 0:09
25/07/02 05:41 - 05:56 = 0:15
25/07/02 04:42 - 04:50 = 0:08
25/07/02 03:25 - 03:31 = 0:06
25/07/02 01:56 - 02:04 = 0:07
24/07/02 23:03 - 23:11 = 0:07
24/07/02 19:24 - 19:34 = 0:09
24/07/02 19:08 - 19:15 = 0:06
23/07/02 17:27 - 18:24 = 0:56
23/07/02 02:55 - 03:01 = 0:05
20/07/02 17:20 - 17:26 = 0:06
19/07/02 14:20 - 15:01 = 0:41
17/07/02 20:32 - 20:39 = 0:07
15/07/02 06:06 - 06:14 = 0:07
14/07/02 14:07 - 14:14 = 0:07
14/07/02 11:05 - 11:10 = 0:05
12/07/02 05:59 - 06:11 = 0:11
12/07/02 00:59 - 01:05 = 0:06
08/07/02 22:30 - 22:36 = 0:06
06/07/02 13:25 - 15:00 = 1:35
04/07/02 22:39 - 22:46 = 0:07
04/07/02 14:47 - 15:19 = 0:32
04/07/02 08:02 - 08:56 = 0:54
04/07/02 06:29 - 06:39 = 0:09
04/07/02 06:06 - 06:16 = 0:10
04/07/02 05:23 - 05:30 = 0:07
04/07/02 04:59 - 05:08 = 0:09
04/07/02 04:32 - 04:43 = 0:11
04/07/02 03:35 - 03:54 = 0:18
04/07/02 01:49 - 01:55 = 0:05
04/07/02 00:34 - 00:40 = 0:05
03/07/02 22:57 - 23:19 = 0:21
03/07/02 22:16 - 22:23 = 0:06
03/07/02 14:47 - 14:55 = 0:07
02/07/02 19:26 - 19:32 = 0:05
01/07/02 14:40 - 14:52 = 0:11
30/06/02 18:34 - 18:40 = 0:05
25/06/02 11:01 - 11:10 = 0:09
25/06/02 08:57 - 10:15 = 1:18
25/06/02 08:31 - 08:44 = 0:12
25/06/02 07:21 - 07:47 = 0:26
24/06/02 21:55 - 22:01 = 0:05

* denotes incomplete data for period
___________________________________
Stats with EyeOnSite v1.4.0