Return-path: <***************************>
Envelope-to: support@earhost.com
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 07:37:00 -0400
Received: from nobody by ************** with local (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 17ffPY-0001ug-00
for support@earhost.com; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 07:37:00 -0400
To: support@earhost.com
Subject: **** service
From: Aunty Martha <shawn@cyberwings.com>
Message-Id: <E17ffPY-0001ug-00@****************>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 07:37:00 -0400


you guys are crap ..and you cheat people out of money .



WOW, Amazing Eh? Someone from shawn@cyberwings.com has the guts to email us and say we suck ass. Wow.

A From: field is meaningless, and you've deleted all of the headers that would be relevant to determining whether that's really where it came from.

So it's hardly "amazing."

I only removed the server name of where this is sending to. For secuirty reasons.

Originally posted by TimPD
I only removed the server name of where this is sending to. And the message-id, and the return-path. If those had your servername in them, and if there really was only one Received: header, this came from closer to home than you might think.

I don't get it, what's so special about recieving a hate mail from this specific user?

Received: from nobody by ************** with local (Exim 3.35 #1)


That line just makes you wonder :D local huh?

That line just makes you wonder local huh?

lol

There were a lot of OT posts, but I think the thread is about the *email* -not the message, really. Thus they were removed.

Originally posted by Chicken
There were a lot of OT posts, but I think the thread is about the *email* -not the message, really. Thus they were removed.


Awww but chicken, some of them were so good :D

Out of curiosity, what is an "OT" post?

OT == Off Topic

Chicken: So you remove the truth saving TimPD's ass once again?

Originally posted by jayjay
Chicken: So you remove the truth saving TimPD's ass once again?

Nah, usually he just locks the threads. I imagine he's tired of doing that and is trying to find another way to stop the feeding frenzy that occurs every time this happens.

Nah, usually he just locks the threads. I imagine he's tired of doing that and is trying to find another way to stop the feeding frenzy that occurs every time this happens.


There's no way to stop it, unless he never posts.

He's screwed people over, and hasn't returned on his promises..

Locking the post might be better than deleting all the posts. But I suppose that's why I'm not a moderator. :P

Mods, please close this thread. :cartman: :D

I'm not trying to save anyone's donkey, however when Tim posts about an email and people start posting about their problems with Tim, yes, it gets removed. There wasn't anything that hadn't been posted about already, and if there was an unposted issue, it should have been a new thread.

If Tim didn't get this email from who he thinks he got the email from, he needs to be told that. The other issues need to be posted elsewhere, as they are unrelated (OT).

I just feel bad for the new visitors who don't know about the scams.

Somebody wanna PM me with a copy of all the good stuff I missed? :D

Back on topic . . . . . . Can we see the full header Tim?