That's about all I got to say about it. :rolleyes:

Although; a picture is worth a thousand words (or 7 out of 10 depending on how you look at it).

as long as he's posting his nonsense messages in the lounge i have no problem with it.....however you do have a point. maybe ned should get his own forum??? :D

I could go along with that.
His own forum.
All ned; all the time.

hmm...wonder if ned.tv is registered already???

Originally posted by SoftWareRevue
I could go along with that.
His own forum.
All ned; all the time.

Along with the new forum, we'd have to legalize drugs there to understand it....

:pimp:

Originally posted by The Prohacker


Along with the new forum, we'd have to legalize drugs there to understand it....

:pimp:

:laugh:

Anyone know this his story, I mean what the hell is it that he is trying to say??

Originally posted by Tux-e-do


:laugh:

Anyone know this his story, I mean what the hell is it that he is trying to say??

Apparently he's Scottish... He flys Kite's...He does something w/ streaming and Windows Media Encoder...

:D... Need I say more...

Originally posted by The Prohacker


Along with the new forum, we'd have to legalize drugs there to understand it....

:pimp: :eek: Drugs ain't legal? :eek:




whoops

There's no problem with that... I'm sure as long as he's not spamming then everytihng is fine...

Why is it such a problem? Is there a point to this topic such as him technicaly spamming!?

I think his posts have improved. Give him a break, he's willing to learn.

Well, I think he is just trying to quickly increase his post count, that's all. :rolleyes:

One reason why I rarely step into the lounge forum.

I think Rackshack should set it so that the lounge forum posts don't count toward post counts.

Peter

Originally posted by ckpeter
I think Rackshack should set it so that the lounge forum posts don't count toward post counts.

I agree with you on that point :) Many big forums have done that and it works just fine.

Good ol' ned :D

I agree with the loung and not counting post counts. Actually, they should just remove post counts. Who really cares anyway?

Originally posted by GlideTech
Actually, they should just remove post counts. Couldn't agree more.

Originally posted by GlideTech
Good ol' ned :D

I agree with the loung and not counting post counts. Actually, they should just remove post counts. Who really cares anyway? The only thing about removing post counts totally (which I was always for; until logic took over) is because of this forums position.
There has to be an easy way to identify the newbie that comes posting about their fantastic host and how we should all check them out. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But, you are less likely to be swayed by that individuals' post as by a member who has a hundred posts.

I know some big forums that don't list post counts and they do quite well. As a matter of fact, I have suggested other forums, as well as this one, lose the post count to cut down on spam.

Maybe if they would go away after 100 posts or so . . . iunno . . . it's a difficult situation; because of the nature of 'this' forum.

Originally posted by Phrozen
Couldn't agree more.
Hu i have no reason why i should want to increase my post count.
Taking away posts counts is a bad idea, i reckon loads host with hosts more if they have high post counts.

Spamming, i have not even mentioned one web address yet and i'm not going to.

I think a universal "ignore" feature would be best.

Good point SWR. I never thought about it that way. I think the idea of turning off post counts after 100 would be good, or would the default user titles achieve the same result?

Originally posted by mwatkins
I think a universal "ignore" feature would be best.
How would you like it if old men got banned?.

Big difference between "banned" and "ignore," ned.

Perhaps you'd be happier here Ned.... http://www.forteantimes.com/forum/index.php

I don't happen to recall you actually talking about hosting on any of your posts - correct me if i am wrong (as i am sure you will).

Cheers

Originally posted by SoftWareRevue
Big difference between "banned" and "ignore," ned.
Well thank you very much for telling me that.

Originally posted by markcastle
Perhaps you'd be happier here Ned.... http://www.forteantimes.com/forum/index.php

I don't happen to recall you actually talking about hosting on any of your posts - correct me if i am wrong (as i am sure you will).

Cheers
Yes your wrong.

Yep - sort of reply i'd expected.
Cheers

Originally posted by SoftWareRevue
There has to be an easy way to identify the newbie that comes posting about their fantastic host and how we should all check them out. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But, you are less likely to be swayed by that individuals' post as by a member who has a hundred posts. This is something I like to call registration date. I'd be more apt to put my trust in a member who has been registered for, say, 6 months, but only has 50 posts or so than I would a member who has 200 posts but only registered a couple of weeks ago.

Originally posted by Phrozen
This is something I like to call registration date. I'd be more apt to put my trust in a member who has been registered for, say, 6 months, but only has 50 posts or so than I would a member who has 200 posts but only registered a couple of weeks ago.

Very good point. Strewth - just looking at this page i see i've been registered the longest (just this one page) but have by far the fewest posts. Hmmm

Excuse me are you calling me a spammer now?.

No you are wrong :D

Originally posted by ned patter

Yes your wrong.

heh, nice one ned - stick to your guns mate, I think you add a great deal to the lounge, I like your posts. Don't let these guys push you around.

Originally posted by GlideTech
No you are wrong :D

ROFL