MMH-Moe
01-14-2008, 08:22 PM
For shared hosting companies, what is more important to have more of installed on your server?
1. CPU
2. Memory
Also, what are you finding to be today's avarage config for your servers to fit around shared hosting 300-400 sites
cywkevin
01-14-2008, 08:27 PM
Depends on your workload but more often drives and memory outweigh the CPU especially with the newer processors.
Stefano-HOSTEEO
01-14-2008, 08:44 PM
I would always go with loads of ram, but it is true it depends on what your users will do, if they will have big mysql databases and stuff.
osphere
01-15-2008, 09:58 AM
As the others said, depends on the average traffic, and what kind of websites they are.
MMH-Moe
01-15-2008, 10:50 AM
They are shared hosting sites. The average site you can assume runs a PHP/Mysql forum, blog or something.
PCS-Chris
01-15-2008, 05:36 PM
I would look to upgrade RAM before CPU, also due to the fact that you can then open up your Apache/MySQL and other service configurations a bit more, to offer better performance from having access to more memory.
As mentioned it does depend on the type of sites being hosted. A few users consuming excessive CPU brings the performance down drasticly for everyone else, its vital that it's monitored.
Fizzadar
01-15-2008, 06:09 PM
You can get some powerful CPU for cheap, so concentrate on the RAM upgrade wise, unless you plan to host massive amounts of MySQL intensive sites.
loveweb
01-15-2008, 08:09 PM
CPU is more importance for shared hosting.
bqinternet
01-15-2008, 08:37 PM
For the average server, you'll usually run out of RAM or disk I/O resources before you ever max out the CPU. The CPU is one of the last things I would upgrade.
osphere
01-15-2008, 10:22 PM
They are shared hosting sites. The average site you can assume runs a PHP/Mysql forum, blog or something.
RAM :agree: