Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : Make offer! - P4 3.2GHz, InterNAP bandwidth, Class C available


NetCloud
12-07-2007, 04:27 AM
Once they're gone, they're gone!

Pentium 3.2 GHz w/ HT
1 GB RAM
2 x 200 GB SATA Hard Drives
500GB InterNAP Bandwidth
CentOS 5
2 IPs
$200/mo | free setup (Or Best Offer!)

/24 Optional - Dedicated Class C (256 IPs): $99/mo

----------------------------------------------

Pentium 2.6 GHz
1 GB RAM
80 GB Hard Drive
500GB InterNAP Bandwidth
CentOS 5
2 IPs
$75/mo | free setup

Cavalier
12-13-2007, 03:34 PM
Did you say 100% Pure InterNAP bandwidth, or crappy Cogent bandwidth?

traceroute to amerihosting.com (209.168.245.100), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 fe5-0-svc2.LON.router.COLT.NET (212.74.64.33) 0.809 ms 0.433 ms 0.499 ms
2 fe6-2-cr1.LON.router.COLT.NET (212.74.64.214) 0.316 ms 0.324 ms 0.249 ms
3 pos1-0-pr2.LON.router.COLT.NET (212.74.64.77) 1.070 ms 0.474 ms 0.559 ms
4 195.66.226.185 (195.66.226.185) 0.898 ms 0.874 ms 0.867 ms
5 te2-1.3493.mpd02.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.2.18) 74.538 ms * 76.702 ms
6 te2-2.ccr04.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.122) 92.707 ms 92.639 ms 92.686 ms
7 te3-3.ccr02.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.246) 92.548 ms 92.625 ms 80.463 ms
8 te8-1.ccr01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.13) 92.685 ms 92.556 ms 92.473 ms
9 gi11-0-0.core01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.37) 92.323 ms 92.482 ms 92.325 ms
10 ITCDeltacomCommunications.demarc.cogentco.com (205.198.2.162) 92.468 ms 92.639 ms 92.438 ms
11 pos3-0.suwangaeq01w.cr.deltacom.net (66.35.174.106) 93.354 ms 93.274 ms 93.215 ms
12 suw02.gig6-0.edeltacom.com (66.35.174.154) 93.501 ms 93.412 ms 1369.086 ms
13 suwC2-gig3-5.qualitytech.com (216.154.207.41) 94.790 ms 95.200 ms 95.222 ms
14 suwE1S-gig1-1-4.qualitytech.com (216.154.207.50) 95.775 ms 95.108 ms 119.267 ms
15 209.168.245.18 (209.168.245.18) 95.798 ms 95.296 ms 94.919 ms
16 amerihosting.com (209.168.245.100) 94.827 ms 95.241 ms 95.061 ms

NetCloud
12-13-2007, 04:13 PM
Hi, I will let QualityTech know, we pay a lot more for Internap bandwidth, so this is obviously not good :-(