
|
View Full Version : Moderators & Members, what do you see here?
To ALL Moderators and Members,
What do you see in my signature?
Is it Four lines or Five lines?
I was told it was five lines and I changed it, I ask the same moderator back but no reply, so I have to ask you guys as I'm running 1280X800 WideScreen Monitor.
Your help is much appreciated.
Thank you.
No ones going to help me?
boonchuan 11-18-2007, 08:18 AM I am running 800 x 600, I saw 5 lines.
Thomas 11-18-2007, 08:21 AM I'm running 1280 x 1080 I see 4 lines
The rules stated is 1024X768, right? Anybody with that monitor specification? Please help.
boonchuan 11-18-2007, 08:30 AM At 1024 x 768 , I saw 4 lines.
So its ok for me to use the signature?
Harzem 11-18-2007, 09:01 AM It is 4 lines on 1024*768. But it is at the limit. You might consider removing the "powered by" text (so just keep Google and Trend Micro names there) just to be safe.
CLCook 11-18-2007, 12:00 PM Looks legit to me!
SoftWareRevue 11-18-2007, 12:14 PM Well, he keeps updating it. :P
So, although it looks fine now, it might not the next time someone reads this thread. :angel:
Well, he keeps updating it. :P
So, although it looks fine now, it might not the next time someone reads this thread. :angel:
Haha! I update it to follow the rules besides making it look attractive. ;)
BTW, can I promote my toolbar here? or is it also 'illegal'?
Vinayak_Sharma 11-18-2007, 01:36 PM Hey JLHC,
The first line Earth Explode Toolbar is not looking good, use regular font and format.
Just a thought.
Hey JLHC,
The first line Earth Explode Toolbar is not looking good, use regular font and format.
Just a thought.
What do you mean by "not looking good"?
Not attractive?
Any suggestions?
Vinayak_Sharma 11-18-2007, 01:47 PM I mean its thick, not clean, people with weak sight may not be able to read it.
Compare it with other's signature like boonchuan & SoftWareRevue have nice, clean, simple and readable/legible.
anon-e-mouse 11-18-2007, 09:42 PM At 1024 x 768 , I saw 4 lines.
I see 5 at that resolution.
Cody Salter 11-18-2007, 11:22 PM What about posting a screenshot or link to one of what they are seeing at whatever resolution, at 2560 x 1600 I see 4 lines.
Nick H 11-18-2007, 11:47 PM I think the rules ought to be changed - 1024x768 isn't a common resolution anymore.
SSHocker 11-19-2007, 03:05 AM I think the rules ought to be changed - 1024x768 isn't a common resolution anymore.
You're right people often resoltions greater than 1024x768 now, but that actually works in their favour, the higher the resilution the more likely they will comply with our sig rules.
linux-tech 11-19-2007, 05:50 AM 1024*768 , it is indeed 5 (using firefox)
1024*768 , it is 4 (using IE7)
1280*1024 +, 4 in both
My guess is that the mod that saw the sig was using Firefox and said it was against the rules. I'd post screenshots, but my main monitor (WS) isn't set to 1024x768, the secondary is.
HostingDeals 11-19-2007, 06:05 AM No one is going to read all that anyway, my advice, just shorten each line down so you KNOW there won't be an issue.
anon-e-mouse 11-19-2007, 08:13 AM 1024*768 , it is indeed 5 (using firefox)
1024*768 , it is 4 (using IE7)
1280*1024 +, 4 in both
My guess is that the mod that saw the sig was using Firefox and said it was against the rules. I'd post screenshots, but my main monitor (WS) isn't set to 1024x768, the secondary is.
I see 5 with IE :P
I see 5 with IE :P
Sure? I asked SWR and he said its not violating the rules.. funny..
writespeak 11-19-2007, 08:50 AM I think the rules ought to be changed - 1024x768 isn't a common resolution anymore.
Actually, the latest stats (http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp) show its usage at 54%. :angel:
Lois
boonchuan 11-19-2007, 09:00 AM I am using Fire Fox......
SoftWareRevue 11-19-2007, 09:08 AM Using IE at 1024x768, here's what I see.
Actually, the latest stats (http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp) show its usage at 54%. :angel:
Lois
Yeah, but the 'higher' resolutions' share have increased steadily. ;)
Using IE at 1024x768, here's what I see.
Wow.. that's close.. ;) :D
IH-Rameen 11-19-2007, 08:21 PM Running at 1680 x 1050 and I see of course 4 lines.
Interesting how the 4 line rule can be "sort of" circumvented in this way..
PAH - Tim 11-20-2007, 03:48 AM I see 4 lines running 1280 x 1080
Interesting how the 4 line rule can be "sort of" circumvented in this way..
This is sort of a 'loophole' for the WHT rules.
Its not standerdise and specific enough for others to follow, as we are all different.
It depends on a lot of factor, which includes monitor resolution, browser, widescreen or not, etc..
anon-e-mouse 11-20-2007, 06:36 AM There is no circumventing if you read the rules.
Must be kept to a maximum of four lines when viewed at 1024x768 resolution using the horizontal postbit.
Have you taken a look through that resolution yet?
"Notifier - News Feeds" is on a line by itself, so those who use █ in their sigs should be aware that it *can* look like a dog's breakfast to those on a lower resolution.
There is no circumventing if you read the rules.
Have you taken a look through that resolution yet?
"Notifier - News Feeds" is on a line by itself, so those who use █ in their sigs should be aware that it *can* look like a dog's breakfast to those on a lower resolution.
I'll try editing it..
IH-Rameen 11-20-2007, 02:20 PM I was actually referring to the feature which stops you from adding so much text that it will result in more than 4 lines. Not referring to actually any loopholes.
Racksurfer 11-24-2007, 09:51 PM Simplicity is the god of all signatures :D
RossMAN 11-25-2007, 03:46 AM I see 4 lines at resolution of 1440x900 (14.1" laptop).
Ok, thanks for everybody's help.
I think I know what to do now.
Err, mod, can this thread be closed now? ;) :lovewht:
SoftWareRevue 11-25-2007, 10:25 AM ... can this thread be closed now? ;) :lovewht:Sure. :wht:
|